Rachelle Eljazzar1, Joshua Loewenstern2, Jennifer B Dai2, Raj K Shrivastava3, Alfred M Iloreta4. 1. Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia, USA. 2. Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. 4. Department of Otolaryngology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA. Electronic address: alfred-marc.iloreta@mountsinai.org.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks traditionally involves laboratory testing of markers and appropriate imaging. Surgical localization can be difficult, and the inability to accurately localize skull base defects leads to increased rates of repair failure and complications. Many imaging techniques localizing and identifying CSF leaks have been proposed. Comparisons of current and investigational imaging techniques used to localize CSF leaks are reviewed. METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, and reference lists from relevant articles was completed to identify literature on sensitivities of different imaging methods for localization and detection of CSF leaks. Prospective, retrospective, and case series published since 1995 that addressed imaging techniques for CSF leaks confined to the skull base were included. Sensitivities of each major imaging technique proposed were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 133 studies initially were screened from 2125 studies on preliminary search. Of these, 38 studies were included based on inclusion criteria. Studies were segregated by imaging modality. A total of 1000 patients with CSF leaks subsequently were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Although radionuclide cisternography has been the historical standard, recent imaging techniques have emerged considering the low sensitivity. Computed tomography cisternography with contrast also has low sensitivity, even in active leaks. Although high-resolution computed tomography is commonly the initial study of choice, magnetic resonance imaging methods, particularly 3-dimensional imaging, may prove to be a more sensitive study of choice. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging combination methods may show promise in localizing CSF leaks. Stratifying by status and etiology may be an important determinant. Further studies investigating various imaging techniques for localizing CSF leaks are needed.
INTRODUCTION: Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks traditionally involves laboratory testing of markers and appropriate imaging. Surgical localization can be difficult, and the inability to accurately localize skull base defects leads to increased rates of repair failure and complications. Many imaging techniques localizing and identifying CSF leaks have been proposed. Comparisons of current and investigational imaging techniques used to localize CSF leaks are reviewed. METHODS: A comprehensive and systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, and reference lists from relevant articles was completed to identify literature on sensitivities of different imaging methods for localization and detection of CSF leaks. Prospective, retrospective, and case series published since 1995 that addressed imaging techniques for CSF leaks confined to the skull base were included. Sensitivities of each major imaging technique proposed were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 133 studies initially were screened from 2125 studies on preliminary search. Of these, 38 studies were included based on inclusion criteria. Studies were segregated by imaging modality. A total of 1000 patients with CSF leaks subsequently were evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Although radionuclide cisternography has been the historical standard, recent imaging techniques have emerged considering the low sensitivity. Computed tomography cisternography with contrast also has low sensitivity, even in active leaks. Although high-resolution computed tomography is commonly the initial study of choice, magnetic resonance imaging methods, particularly 3-dimensional imaging, may prove to be a more sensitive study of choice. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging combination methods may show promise in localizing CSF leaks. Stratifying by status and etiology may be an important determinant. Further studies investigating various imaging techniques for localizing CSF leaks are needed.
Authors: Hussain Albaharna; Mohammad Alshareef; Saud Alromaih; Mohammad Aloulah; Saad Alsaleh; Ahmad Alroqi Journal: Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol Date: 2021-10-15
Authors: Christine Steiert; Luisa M Kraus; Roland Roelz; Horst Urbach; Juergen Beck; Stephan Meckel; Juergen Grauvogel Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-04-29 Impact factor: 3.246
Authors: I E Duman; T Demerath; A Stadler; S Elsheikh; E Raithel; C Forman; T Hildenbrand; M Shah; J Grauvogel; C Scheiwe; H Urbach; S Meckel Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 3.825