Literature DB >> 30797887

Assessment of priority tobacco additives per the requirements of the EU Tobacco Products Directive (2014/40/EU): Part 1: Background, approach, and summary of findings.

Liam Simms1, Anna Clarke2, Thilo Paschke3, Andrew Manson4, James Murphy5, Regina Stabbert6, Marco Esposito6, David Ghosh7, Ewald Roemer8, Javier Martinez3, Jarl Freiesleben9, Hyo-Keun Kim10, Thomas Lindegaard11, Marc Scharfe12, Istvan Vincze13, Panagiotis Vlachos14, Diane Wigotzki15, Gwen Pollner16, Rolf Lutz7.   

Abstract

This paper is part of a series of 3 publications and describes the non-clinical and clinical assessment performed to fulfill the regulatory requirement per Art. 6 (2) of the EU Tobacco Products Directive 2014/40/EU; under which Member States shall require manufacturers and importers of cigarettes and roll-your-own tobacco containing an additive that is included in the priority list established by Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/787 to carry out comprehensive studies. The Directive requires manufacturers and importers of cigarettes and Roll Your Own tobacco to examine for each additive whether it; contributes to and increases the toxicity or addictiveness of tobacco products to a significant or measurable degree; if it leads to a characterizing flavor of the product; if it facilitates inhalation or nicotine uptake, and if it results in the formation of CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic) constituents and if these substances increase the CMR properties of the respective tobacco product to a significant or measurable degree. This publication gives an overview on comprehensive smoke chemistry, in vitro toxicity, and human clinical studies commissioned by the members of the Priority Additives Tobacco Consortium to independent Contract Research Organizations (CROs) where the emissions of test cigarettes containing priority additives were compared to emissions emerging from an additive-free reference cigarette. Whilst minor changes in smoke chemistry parameters were observed when comparing emissions from test cigarettes with emissions from additive-free reference cigarettes, only two of the additives (sorbitol and guar gum) tested led to significant increases in a limited number of smoke constituents. These changes were not observed when sorbitol or guar gum were tested in a mixture with other priority additives. None of the priority additives resulted in increases in in vitro toxicity (Ames, Micronucleus, Neutral Red Uptake) or led to changes in smoking behavior or absorption (rate or amount) of nicotine measured during the human clinical study as compared to the additive-free reference cigarette.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cigarette; Clinical; In-vitro; Priority additive; Sensory; Smoke chemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30797887     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.02.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  3 in total

Review 1.  Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part A: Main outcomes and conclusions.

Authors:  Anne Havermans; Nadja Mallock; Efthimios Zervas; Stéphanie Caillé-Garnier; Thibault Mansuy; Cécile Michel; Jeroen L A Pennings; Thomas Schulz; Per E Schwarze; Renata Solimini; Jean-Pol Tassin; Constantine I Vardavas; Miguel Merino; Charlotte G G M Pauwels; Lotte E van Nierop; Claude Lambré; Anette K Bolling
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2022-07-05

2.  Review of industry reports on EU priority tobacco additives part B: Methodological limitations.

Authors:  Anette K Bolling; Nadja Mallock; Efthimios Zervas; Stéphanie Caillé-Garnier; Thibault Mansuy; Cécile Michel; Jeroen L A Pennings; Thomas Schulz; Per E Schwarze; Renata Solimini; Jean-Pol Tassin; Constantine Vardavas; Miguel Merino; Charlotte G G M Pauwels; Lotte E van Nierop; Claude Lambré; Anne Havermans
Journal:  Tob Prev Cessat       Date:  2022-07-05

3.  The use of human induced pluripotent stem cells to screen for developmental toxicity potential indicates reduced potential for non-combusted products, when compared to cigarettes.

Authors:  Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Jessica Palmer; Lukasz Czekala; Fan Yu; Fiona Chapman; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-15
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.