M B Christensen1, P Gæde2, E Hommel3, A Gotfredsen4, K Nørgaard5. 1. Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. Electronic address: Merete.bechmann.christensen.01@regionh.dk. 2. Department of Cardiology and Endocrinology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark. 3. Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark. 4. Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark. 5. Department of Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark; Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark.
Abstract
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between C-peptide levels, glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A total of 98 patients with T2D treated with basal-bolus insulin were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia were assessed from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data recorded over 6 days: Glycemic variability was assessed by calculating the mean coefficient of variation (CV), while hypoglycemia was defined as sensor glucose levels ≤ 3.9 mmol/L or < 3.0 mmol/L. Fasting C-peptide and fasting glucose were measured on day 1. RESULTS: Low levels of fasting C-peptide correlated with higher CV (r = -0.53, P < 0.0001). In a multivariate regression model with HbA1c, body mass index, diabetes duration and total daily insulin dose, only C-peptide was significantly associated with CV. Patients with ≥ 1 episode of hypoglycaemia had significantly lower median C-peptide levels than patients without hypoglycaemia (274 (136-620) pmol/L vs. 675 (445-1013) pmol/L, respectively; P = 0.0004). Also, 17 patients clinically diagnosed with T2D had detectable glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies (≥ 5 U/mL). These GAD-positive patients had significantly lower fasting C-peptide, higher CV and greater frequency of hypoglycaemia than GAD-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with insulin-treated T2D, low levels of C-peptide are associated with greater glycaemic variability and higher risk of hypoglycaemia, suggesting that C-peptide levels should be taken into consideration when optimizing insulin treatment and assessing hypoglycaemia risk.
AIM: The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between C-peptide levels, glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS: A total of 98 patients with T2D treated with basal-bolus insulin were enrolled in a cross-sectional study. Glycaemic variability and hypoglycaemia were assessed from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data recorded over 6 days: Glycemic variability was assessed by calculating the mean coefficient of variation (CV), while hypoglycemia was defined as sensor glucose levels ≤ 3.9 mmol/L or < 3.0 mmol/L. Fasting C-peptide and fasting glucose were measured on day 1. RESULTS: Low levels of fasting C-peptide correlated with higher CV (r = -0.53, P < 0.0001). In a multivariate regression model with HbA1c, body mass index, diabetes duration and total daily insulin dose, only C-peptide was significantly associated with CV. Patients with ≥ 1 episode of hypoglycaemia had significantly lower median C-peptide levels than patients without hypoglycaemia (274 (136-620) pmol/L vs. 675 (445-1013) pmol/L, respectively; P = 0.0004). Also, 17 patients clinically diagnosed with T2D had detectable glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) antibodies (≥ 5 U/mL). These GAD-positive patients had significantly lower fasting C-peptide, higher CV and greater frequency of hypoglycaemia than GAD-negative patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with insulin-treated T2D, low levels of C-peptide are associated with greater glycaemic variability and higher risk of hypoglycaemia, suggesting that C-peptide levels should be taken into consideration when optimizing insulin treatment and assessing hypoglycaemia risk.
Authors: Vladimir Kron; Miroslav Verner; Pavel Smetana; Jana Janoutova; Vladimir Janout; Karel Martinik Journal: J Appl Biomed Date: 2020-12-08 Impact factor: 1.797
Authors: Juraj Koska; Daniel S Nuyujukian; Gideon D Bahn; Jin J Zhou; Peter D Reaven Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2021-12-08 Impact factor: 9.951
Authors: Grazia Aleppo; Christopher G Parkin; Anders L Carlson; Rodolfo J Galindo; Davida F Kruger; Carol J Levy; Guillermo E Umpierrez; Gregory P Forlenza; Janet B McGill Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2021-06-17 Impact factor: 6.118