Christina C Wee1, Aaron Fleishman2,3, Ashley C McCarthy4, Donald T Hess5, Caroline Apovian4, Daniel B Jones3. 1. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. cwee@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 3. Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. 4. Evans Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02118, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Weight loss surgery (WLS) is neither risk-free nor universally effective. Few studies have examined what proportion of patients regret having undergone WLS. METHODS: We interviewed patients at two WLS centers before and after WLS about weight loss, quality of life/QOL (Impact of Weight on QOL-lite), and decision regret (modified Brehaut Regret scale, range 0-100). We conducted separate multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between weight loss and ∆QOL scores and having decision regret (score > 50). RESULTS: Of 205 RYGB patients, only 2.2% (year 1) to 5.1% (year 4, n = 134) reported regret scores > 50 over 4 years; 2.0-4.5% did not think they made the right decision; 2.0-4.5% would not undergo WLS again. In contrast, of 188 gastric banding patients (n = 123 at year 4), 8.2-20.3% had regret scores > 50; 5.9-19.5% did not think they made the right decision; 7.1-19.5% would not undergo WLS again. Weight loss and ∆QOL scores were significant correlates of decision regret after banding although weight loss was a stronger correlate with lower model quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion score. Four years after banding, mean weight loss for patients with regret scores > 50 was 7.4% vs. 21.1% for those with scores < 50; the AOR for regret score > 50 was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) for every 1% greater weight loss. Poor sexual function, but not weight loss or other QOL factors, was significantly correlated with decision regret after RYGB. CONCLUSION: Few patients regret undergoing RYGB but 20% regret undergoing gastric banding with weight loss being a major driver.
BACKGROUND: Weight loss surgery (WLS) is neither risk-free nor universally effective. Few studies have examined what proportion of patients regret having undergone WLS. METHODS: We interviewed patients at two WLS centers before and after WLS about weight loss, quality of life/QOL (Impact of Weight on QOL-lite), and decision regret (modified Brehaut Regret scale, range 0-100). We conducted separate multivariable logistic regression models to examine the association between weight loss and ∆QOL scores and having decision regret (score > 50). RESULTS: Of 205 RYGB patients, only 2.2% (year 1) to 5.1% (year 4, n = 134) reported regret scores > 50 over 4 years; 2.0-4.5% did not think they made the right decision; 2.0-4.5% would not undergo WLS again. In contrast, of 188 gastric banding patients (n = 123 at year 4), 8.2-20.3% had regret scores > 50; 5.9-19.5% did not think they made the right decision; 7.1-19.5% would not undergo WLS again. Weight loss and ∆QOL scores were significant correlates of decision regret after banding although weight loss was a stronger correlate with lower model quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion score. Four years after banding, mean weight loss for patients with regret scores > 50 was 7.4% vs. 21.1% for those with scores < 50; the AOR for regret score > 50 was 0.90 (95% CI 0.87-0.94) for every 1% greater weight loss. Poor sexual function, but not weight loss or other QOL factors, was significantly correlated with decision regret after RYGB. CONCLUSION: Few patients regret undergoing RYGB but 20% regret undergoing gastric banding with weight loss being a major driver.
Entities:
Keywords:
Decision-making; Quality of life; Weight loss
Authors: Christina C Wee; Daniel B Jones; Caroline Apovian; Donald T Hess; Sarah N Chiodi; Ashley C Bourland; Roger B Davis; Benjamin Schneider; George L Blackburn; Edward R Marcantonio; Mary Beth Hamel Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2017-11 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Lars Sjöström; Markku Peltonen; Peter Jacobson; C David Sjöström; Kristjan Karason; Hans Wedel; Sofie Ahlin; Åsa Anveden; Calle Bengtsson; Gerd Bergmark; Claude Bouchard; Björn Carlsson; Sven Dahlgren; Jan Karlsson; Anna-Karin Lindroos; Hans Lönroth; Kristina Narbro; Ingmar Näslund; Torsten Olbers; Per-Arne Svensson; Lena M S Carlsson Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kenneth F Adams; Arthur Schatzkin; Tamara B Harris; Victor Kipnis; Traci Mouw; Rachel Ballard-Barbash; Albert Hollenbeck; Michael F Leitzmann Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David Reed Flum; Steven H Belle; Wendy C King; Abdus S Wahed; Paul Berk; William Chapman; Walter Pories; Anita Courcoulas; Carol McCloskey; James Mitchell; Emma Patterson; Alfons Pomp; Myrlene A Staten; Susan Z Yanovski; Richard Thirlby; Bruce Wolfe Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-07-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christina C Wee; Mary Beth Hamel; Caroline M Apovian; George L Blackburn; Dragana Bolcic-Jankovic; Mary Ellen Colten; Donald T Hess; Karen W Huskey; Edward R Marcantonio; Benjamin E Schneider; Daniel B Jones Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Noah J Harrison; Molly M Ford; Erin M Wolf Horrell; Michael Feng; Fei Ye; Kevin C Zhang; Alexander T Hawkins Journal: Surgery Date: 2022-08-01 Impact factor: 4.348
Authors: Katarzyna Bartosiak; Michał R Janik; Maciej Walędziak; Krzysztof Paśnik; Andrzej Kwiatkowski Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2022-05-27 Impact factor: 3.479