Literature DB >> 3079656

Women at risk for developing osteoporosis: determination by total body neutron activation analysis and photon absorptiometry.

S H Cohn, J F Aloia, A N Vaswani, K Yuen, S Yasumura, K J Ellis.   

Abstract

With stepwise multiple logistic regression (MLR), probabilistic classification equations were developed to identify asymptomatic women who are at risk for development of fracture of the spine. Clinically normal women with low TBCa/square root H ratios can be classified as at risk for osteoporosis prior to their developing spinal compression fractures. With receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, it was possible to verify the accuracy of the MLR model to discriminate "normal" women at risk, with high sensitivity and specificity. With the MLR model, discrimination of osteoporotic women (50-59 years) was made correctly for 86.2% of the total osteoporotic subjects with the TBCa data. Similar models were derived from the photon absorptiometry data. From the spinal density (BDs) data, correct classification in the 50-59 year group was 55.6% of the total osteoporosis subjects; from the radius density (BMCr) data, the corresponding value was 31%. The highest probability of identifying osteoporosis in all age categories was, therefore, on the basis of TBCa data. Similar, but less accurate discrimination was achieved with the BDs and BMCr data. These conclusions were confirmed by the application of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Correct identification of the population at risk permits the timely and efficient application of therapeutic programs prior to onset of fracture. In a serial study of 104 peri-menopausal women, for example, it was possible to determine the P value for individuals measured annually over a 3-10 year period and thus to predict normal individuals at risk for developing osteoporosis each year.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3079656     DOI: 10.1007/bf02556588

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  11 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Determining the value of diagnostic and screening tests.

Authors:  B J McNeil; S J Adelstein
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Quantitation of the degree of osteoporosis by measure of total-body calcium employing neutron activation.

Authors:  S H Cohn; I Zanzi; A Vaswani; S Wallach; J Aloia; K J Ellis
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1976-08

4.  Absolute and relative deficit in total-skeletal calcium and radial bone mineral in osteoporosis.

Authors:  S H Cohn; K J Ellis; S Wallach; I Zanzi; H L Atkins; J F Aloia
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Techniques for determining the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S H Cohn
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Covariance adjustment of rates based on the multiple logistic regression model.

Authors:  J Lee
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1981

7.  Total body and regional bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry in metabolic bone disease.

Authors:  R B Mazess; W W Peppler; R W Chesney; T A Lange; U Lindgren; E Smith
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Total body calcium by neutron activation analysis in normals and osteoporotic populations: a discriminator of significant bone mass loss.

Authors:  S M Ott; R Murano; T K Lewellen; W B Nelp; C M Chesnut
Journal:  J Lab Clin Med       Date:  1983-10

9.  Epidemiology of postmenopausal spinal and long bone fractures. A unifying approach to postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  G F Jensen; C Christiansen; J Boesen; V Hegedüs; I Transbøl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

Authors:  B L Riggs; H W Wahner; W L Dunn; R B Mazess; K P Offord; L J Melton
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for prevention of osteoporosis and hip fracture.

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; T W Meade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-08-24

2.  A critical review of bone mass and the risk of fractures in osteoporosis.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; J M Vogel; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 3.  When bone mass fails to predict bone failure.

Authors:  S M Ott
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  Hip fracture patients have generalized osteopenia with a preferential deficit in the femur.

Authors:  J F Aloia; D McGowan; E Erens; G Miele
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.507

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.