| Literature DB >> 30794540 |
Ronny Decorte1,2, Caroline Polet3, Mathieu Boudin4, Françoise Tilquin5, Jean-Yves Matroule5, Marc Dieu6, Catherine Charles7, Aurore Carlier8, Fiona Lebecque8, Olivier Deparis9.
Abstract
The reliquary of Jacques de Vitry, a prominent clergyman and theologian in the early 13th century, has experienced several transfers over the last centuries, which seriously question the attribution of the remains to the late Cardinal. Uncertainty about the year of his birth poses an additional question regarding his age at death in 1240. The reliquary, located in the Saint Marie d'Oigines church, Belgium, was reopened in 2015 for an interdisciplinary study around his relics as well as the Treasure of Oignies, a remarkable cultural heritage notably built from Jacques de Vitry's donation. Anthropological, isotopic and genetic analyses were performed independently on the remains found in the reliquary. Results of the analyses provided evidence that the likelihood that these remains are those of Jacques de Vitry is very high: the remains belong to the same human male individual and the historical tradition about his age is confirmed. In addition, a separate relic (left tibia) was analysed and found to match with the remains of the reliquary (right tibia). The unique Jacques de Vitry's mitre, made of parchment, was sampled non-destructively and the extracted parchment collagen was analysed by a proteomic method in order to determine the animal species. The results showed that, surprisingly, not all parts of the mitre were made from the same species. All together, these findings are expected to fertilize knowledge carried by historical tradition around the relics of Jacques de Vitry and his related cultural heritage.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30794540 PMCID: PMC6386372 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Jacques de Vitry’s mitre made of parchment.
Donation of Jacques de Vitry to the priory of Oignies (collection of the Treasure of Oignies, Belgium). (A) Early photography (1879). (B) Contemporary photography with sampling spots indicated for parchment proteomic analyses (1, 2: cap; 3 cap border; 4, 5: left and right lappets). Reprinted under a CC BY license with permission from Vedrin, Guy Focant, original copyright 2012.
Bone samples used for analyses.
| Type of analysis | Laboratory | Bone samples | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Isotopic analysis (δ13C, δ15N, 14C) | KIRK-IRPA | Left tibia | 2 samples |
| Right tibia | 1 sample | ||
| Skull fragment | 1 sample | ||
| Genetic analysis (nuclear DNA) | UNamur | Left tibia | Powder |
| Right tibia | Powder | ||
| Petrous bone | Powder | ||
| Genetic analysis (nuclear DNA, mtDNA) | KUL | Left tibia | Powder |
| Reused tooth | Previously used for cement chrono-analysis | ||
| Upper tooth 1 | - | ||
| Upper tooth 2 | - | ||
| Petrous bone | Powder and fragments |
a Sampled at UNamur and sent to KUL.
Fig 2Remains found in the reliquary.
(A) Inventory of the remains. (B) Radiography of the left and right tibias. (C) Left tibia (top) and right tibia (bottom). (D) Evidences of cuts on the bones (articulations).
Results of isotopic analyses: Sample laboratory codes and names, 14C ages (BP), calibrated ages (2σ), stable isotope fractionations (δ13C and δ15N), C:N ratio of collagen extracted from different bone samples from the remains.
| Lab-code | Sample name | 14C age (BP) | Calibrated age (2σ) | δ13C (‰) | δ15N (‰) | Atomic C:N ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RICH-22318.1.1 | Left Tibia 1 | 915±28 | 1030AD (95.4%) 1190AD | -19.9 | 10.8 | 3.3 |
| RICH-22318.2.2 | Left Tibia 2 | 903±28 | 1030AD (95.4%) 1210AD | -20.0 | 11.0 | 3.3 |
| RICH- 22319.2.1 | Right Tibia | 896±26 | 1040AD (95.4%) 1220AD | -19.8 | 11.2 | 3.2 |
| RICH-23856 | Skull | 957±26 | 1020AD (95.4%) 1160AD | -19.0 | 11.0 | 2.9 |
BP, Before Present. σ, standard deviation.
Fig 3Radiocarbon dating results from the remains.
(A) Calibrated ages (2σ) of the left tibia, right tibia and skull. (B) Average age of the four 14C dates determined for these remains.
Fig 4PCR amplification of 5 STRs from the Y chromosome.
Left tibia (LT), right tibia (LT), petrous bone (S), negative control (-), positive control (+).
Consensus genotyping results of the analysis of nine autosomal STRs, Amelogenin and 40 Y-chromosome STRs in DNA extracts from two upper teeth.
| Autosomal STRs | AMEL | D2S441 | D1S1656 | D12S391 | D10S1248 | D21S11 | D22S1045 | D18S51 | D1S1677 | FGA |
| Amplicon length (bp) | 123–129 | 72–112 | 115–168 | 169–227 | 78–142 | 150–217 | 68–119 | 139–219 | 74–118 | 119–278 |
| Y | 11 | 16.3 | - | 14 | - | - | 14 | 13,15 | 18,(22) | |
| Y | (11),14 | - | - | 14 | 32.2 | - | 14,(20) | 13,(15) | 18,22 | |
| Y-STRs | DYS438 | DYS392 | DYS458 | DYS385 | DYS460 | DYS481 | ||||
| Amplicon length (bp) | 87–140 | 90–130 | 130–160 | 237–316 | 95–123 | 105–168 | ||||
| 9 | 11 | 14 | 12,13 | - | 22 | |||||
| - | - | 14 | - | 10 | - |
1 Amelogenin.
[] PCR fragments attributed to stochastic effects of either high stutter or drop-in; () alleles with lower peak height (heterozygote imbalance).
Results of mtDNA Sanger sequencing for different bone and teeth samples from the remains.
| HVI (16008–16366) | HVII (48–155) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16126 | 16145 | 16192 | 16224 | 16256 | 16261 | 16270 | 16304 | 73 | 150 | 152 | |
1 cCRS, revised Cambridge Reference Sequence [28].
2 minor presence of nucleotide in sequence.
Analyst is the person who performed the DNA extraction and sequence analysis.
Results of species identification in parchment parts of the mitre.
| Sample | Location | Species-specific peptides (SSP) detected | Number of SSP validated and sequenced | Identified species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cap | 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | Cap | 1 | 12 | |
| 3 | Lower part of cap | 2 | 3 | |
| 4 | Left lappet | 7 | 52 | |
| 5 | Right lappet | 2 | 5 |