Literature DB >> 30793968

Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Outcomes of Patients after Gastrectomy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Nonrandomized Studies.

Jian Li1, Run Xu1, Deng-Min Hu1, Yao Zhang1, Tu-Ping Gong1, Xue-Lian Wu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the survival predication value of preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in patients with gastric cancer. The second aim was to explore the relationship between preoperative PNI and clinicopathological features.
METHODS: A systematic search of the electronic databases identified studies that investigated the association of preoperative PNI with short or long-term outcomes among patients after gastrectomy for cancer. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of results was conducted.
RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with a total of 14,403 patients with gastric cancer met inclusion criteria for this review. Pooled analysis demonstrated that low preoperative PNI was associated with significantly reduced overall survival (HR 1.81, 95% CI: 1.56-2.09; P = 0.000), cancer-specific survival (HR 1.61, 95% CI: 1.24-2.10; P = 0.000), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.82, 95% CI: 1.20-2.77; P = 0.005). In addition, risk of postoperative complications (POCs) and mortality was significantly higher in patients with lower preoperative PNI (RR 1.77, 95% CI: 1.44-2.17; P = 0.000 and RR 5.14, 95% CI: 2.23-11.79; P = 0.000, respectively).
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that patients with low preoperative PNI may have a high incidence of POCs and poor prognosis following gastrectomy for cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30793968     DOI: 10.1080/01635581.2019.1577986

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nutr Cancer        ISSN: 0163-5581            Impact factor:   2.900


  6 in total

1.  Body composition and immunonutritional status in patients treated with pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for gastrointestinal peritoneal metastases: a prospective single-center analysis.

Authors:  Stefano Rotolo; Andrea Di Giorgio; Marco Cintoni; Emanuele Rinninella; Marta Palombaro; Gabriele Pulcini; Carlo Alberto Schena; Vito Chiantera; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Antonio Gasbarrini; Fabio Pacelli; Maria Cristina Mele
Journal:  Pleura Peritoneum       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Prognostic and clinicopathological significance of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in patients with gastric cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junhua Yu; Huiling Liu; Xueyun Zeng; Yujun Zhao; Dejun Jiang; Hang Lu; Jun Qian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The therapeutic strategy for advanced gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis and liver metastasis; successfully treated by gastro-jejunal bypass and chemotherapy first, followed by curative R0 resection.

Authors:  Naosuke Nakamichi; Masahiro Tsujiura; Tomohiro Matsui; Taiga Yamamoto; Ayana Yoshioka; Hidekazu Hiramoto; Yoshimi Ouchi; Takeshi Ishimoto; Toshiyuki Kosuga; Satoshi Mochizuki; Susumu Nakashima; Masamichi Bamba; Mamoru Masuyama; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Surg Case Rep       Date:  2021-01-06

Review 4.  Long-term and short-term prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Li Yan; Tomoki Nakamura; Andrea Casadei-Gardini; Gema Bruixola; Yuan-Lan Huang; Zhi-De Hu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-11

Review 5.  The Impact of Perioperative Events on Cancer Recurrence and Metastasis in Patients after Radical Gastrectomy: A Review.

Authors:  Xing Zhi; Xiaohong Kuang; Jian Li
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Clinical significance of peripheral blood-derived inflammation markers in advanced gastric cancer after radical resection.

Authors:  Lihu Gu; Mian Wang; Xuena Cui; Jiahang Mo; Lingling Yuan; Feiyan Mao; Kang Zhang; Derry Minyao Ng; Ping Chen; Dongjie Wang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-10-02       Impact factor: 2.102

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.