| Literature DB >> 30792528 |
Ben F Bulten1,2, Martina Sollini3,4, Roberto Boni5,4, Katrin Massri6,4, Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei7,8, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven9, Riemer H J A Slart7,10, Paola A Erba4,10.
Abstract
Doxorubicin (DOX) is a potent chemotherapeutic with distinct cardiotoxic properties. Understanding the underlying cardiotoxic mechanisms on a molecular level would enable the early detection of cardiotoxicity and implementation of prophylactic treatment. Our goal was to map the patterns of different radiopharmaceuticals as surrogate markers of specific metabolic pathways induced by chemotherapy. Therefore, cardiac distribution of 99mTc-sestamibi, 99mTc-Annexin V, 99mTc-glucaric acid and [18F]FDG and cardiac expression of Bcl-2, caspase-3 and -8, TUNEL, HIF-1α, and p53 were assessed in response to DOX exposure in mice. A total of 80 mice (64 treated, 16 controls) were evaluated. All radiopharmaceuticals showed significantly increased uptake compared to controls, with peak cardiac uptake after one (99mTc-Annexin V), two (99mTc-sestamibi), three ([18F]FDG), or four (99mTc-glucaric acid) cycles of DOX. Strong correlations (p < 0.01) were observed between 99mTc-Annexin V, caspase 3 and 8, and TUNEL, and between [18F]FDG and HIF-1α. This suggests that the cardiac DOX response starts with apoptosis at low exposure levels, as indicated by 99mTc-Annexin V and histological apoptosis markers. Late process membrane disintegration can possibly be detected by 99mTc-sestamibi and 99mTc-glucaric acid. [18F]FDG signifies an early adaptive response to DOX, which can be further exploited clinically in the near future.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30792528 PMCID: PMC6385261 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-38986-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1The studied cardiac markers in the process of AIC. DOX = doxorubicin, PS = phosphatyldiserine, NRG = neuregulin, GLUT = glucose transporter, ROS = reactive oxygen species.
Figure 2Schematic study design. Non-imaging markers are WB, IHC, and FACS expression markers. † = sacrifice of mice.
Figure 3Biodistribution of radiopharmaceuticals during treatment. At baseline and after one, two, three, or four cycles of DOX administration (corresponding to a dose of 15, 20, 45, or 60 mg/kg), expressed as %ID/g.
Figure 5Median cardiac uptake of radiopharmaceuticals in all treatment cycles, stratified according to treatment with DOX. The median uptake differed significantly between DOX-treated and DOX-naïve mice for all radiopharmaceuticals (p < 0.05, Mann Whitney U).
Cardiac uptake of investigated markers.
| DOX status | Median uptake in % (SD) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| Treated | 3.71 (0.003) | 5.06 (0.004) | 5.09 (0.011) | 5.02 (0.004) | 0.007 | |
| Naïve | 3.79 (0.002) | 3.45 (0.002) | 3.40 (0.002) |
| |||
| Difference | 1.18* | 8.18* | 1.64* | 1.62* | |||
|
| Treated | 0.86 (0.002) | 2.65 (0.003) | 1.40 (0.001) | 1.52 (0.002) | 0.002 | |
| Naïve | 0.82 (0.001) | 0.81 (0.002) | 0.82 (0.001) |
| |||
| Difference | 3.87* | 1.75* | 0.59* | 0.70* | |||
|
| Treated | 0.75 (0.002) | 0.80 (0.001) | 0.90 (0.001) | 1.07 (0.001) | 0.009 | |
| Naïve | 0.63 (0.001) | 0.70 (0.001) | 0.87 (0.001) |
| |||
| Difference | 0.17* | 0.20* | 0.19* | 0.23* | |||
| [18F]FDG | Treated | 1.51 (0.003) | 4.00 (0.002) | 4.22 (0.002) | 4.18 (0.004) | 0.03 | |
| Naïve | 1.48 (0.001) | 1.63 (0.002) |
| ||||
| Difference | 2.52* | 2.59* | 2.61* | 2.51* | |||
|
| |||||||
|
| Treated | 3560 (773) | 3305 (437) | 2790 (246) | 3850 (250) |
| 0.009 |
|
| 1908 (79) | 2395 (132) | 2905 (358) | 4565 (273) |
| 0.001 | |
|
| 1575 (234) |
| 3715 (208) | 2255 (172) | 2325 (211) | 0.002 | |
|
| 1550 (173) |
| 2630 (215) | 1895 (163) | 1700 (335) | 0.003 | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 0.48 (0.14) |
| 3.56 (0.31) | 1.74 (0.20) | 1.95 (0.24) | 0.001 | |
|
| 0.22 (0.05) | 0.36 (0.06) | 0.29 (0.02) |
| 0.27 (0.03) | 0.005 | |
|
| 0.18 (0.04) |
| 4.63 (0.40) | 1.66 (0.64) | 0.98 (0.23) | 0.001 | |
*p-value < 0.05 (Mann-Whitney U). †p-value (Kruskal-Wallis). Bold = highest uptake in time; DOX = doxorubicin; SD = standard deviation; WB = Western blot; IHC = immunohistochemistry.
Correlations of investigated markers stratified to studied mechanism.
| Bcl-2 | Caspase 3 (WB) | Caspase 8 | p53 | TUNEL | HIF-1α | Caspase 3 (IHC) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| 99mTc-Annexin V | −0.50* | 0.91† | 0.89† | 0.08 | 0.95† | 0.92† | |
|
| |||||||
| 99mTc-sestamibi | −0.55* | 0.38 | |||||
| 99mTc-glucaric acid | 0.28 | −0.04 | |||||
|
| |||||||
| 99mTc-sestamibi | 0.17 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| [18F]FDG | 0.60† | ||||||
Correlations assessed by Spearman’s ρ. *p < 0.05. †p < 0.01. WB = Western blot; IHC = immunohistochemistry.
Figure 6Scatter plot of 99mTc-Annexin V correlations (ρ > 0.80).