Literature DB >> 30791819

Intensive Triangulation of Qualitative Research and Quantitative Data to Improve Recruitment to Randomized Trials: The QuinteT Approach.

Leila Rooshenas1, Sangeetha Paramasivan1, Marcus Jepson1, Jenny L Donovan1.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) can provide high quality evidence about the comparative effectiveness of health care interventions, but many RCTs struggle with or fail to complete recruitment. RCTs are built on the principles of the experimental method, but their planning, conduct, and interpretation can depend on complex social, behavioral, and cultural factors that may be best understood through qualitative research. Most qualitative studies undertaken alongside RCTs involve interviews that produce data that are used in a supportive or supplicatory role, but there is potential for qualitative research to be more influential. In this article, we describe the research methods underpinning the "QuinteT" (Qualitative Research Integrated Within Trials) approach to understand and address RCT recruitment difficulties. The QuinteT Recruitment Intervention (QRI) brings together multiple qualitative strategies and quantitative data and uses triangulation to understand recruitment issues rapidly. These nuanced understandings are used to inform the implementation of collaborative actions to improve recruitment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trials; communication; epidemiology; interviews; methodology; observation; qualitative; randomised controlled trials; sociology

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30791819     DOI: 10.1177/1049732319828693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Health Res        ISSN: 1049-7323


  13 in total

1.  Patient and health practitioner views and experiences of a cancer trial before and during COVID-19: qualitative study.

Authors:  Frances C Sherratt; Peter Fisher; Amy Mathieson; Mary G Cherry; Andrew R Pettitt; Bridget Young
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 2.728

2.  Pre-trial qualitative work with health care professionals to refine the design and delivery of a randomised controlled trial on kidney care.

Authors:  Samantha Husbands; Fergus Caskey; Helen Winton; Andy Gibson; Jenny L Donovan; Leila Rooshenas
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Perceived barriers to randomised controlled trials in breast reconstruction: obstacle to trial initiation or opportunity to resolve? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Gareth Davies; Nicola Mills; Chris Holcombe; Shelley Potter
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Maximising recruitment to a randomised controlled trial for chronic rhinosinusitis using qualitative research methods: the MACRO conversation study.

Authors:  Clare McDermott; Jane Vennik; Carl Philpott; Steffi le Conte; Mike Thomas; Caroline Eyles; Paul Little; Helen Blackshaw; Anne Schilder; Claire Hopkins
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Shifting research culture to address the mismatch between where trials recruit and where populations with the most disease live: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Tanvi Rai; Sharon Dixon; Sue Ziebland
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Best-BRA (Is subpectoral or prepectoral implant placement best in immediate breast reconstruction?): a protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial of subpectoral versus prepectoral immediate implant-based breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy.

Authors:  Kirsty Roberts; Nicola Mills; Chris Metcalfe; Athene Lane; Clare Clement; William Hollingworth; Jodi Taylor; Chris Holcombe; Joanna Skillman; Katherine Fairhurst; Lisa Whisker; Ramsey Cutress; Steven Thrush; Patricia Fairbrother; Shelley Potter
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Stakeholder perspectives on barriers and enablers to recruiting anxious children undergoing day surgery under general anaesthetic: a qualitative internal pilot study of the MAGIC randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Kettle; Chris Deery; Robert Bolt; Diana Papaioannou; Zoe Marshman
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer.

Authors:  C Conefrey; J L Donovan; R C Stein; S Paramasivan; A Marshall; J Bartlett; D Cameron; A Campbell; J Dunn; H Earl; P Hall; V Harmer; L Hughes-Davies; I Macpherson; A Makris; A Morgan; S Pinder; C Poole; D Rea; L Rooshenas
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.126

9.  Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery 2 (MARS 2): protocol for a multicentre randomised trial comparing (extended) pleurectomy decortication versus no (extended) pleurectomy decortication for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Eric Lim; Liz Darlison; John Edwards; Daisy Elliott; D A Fennell; Sanjay Popat; Robert C Rintoul; David Waller; Clinton Ali; Andrea Bille; Liz Fuller; Andreea Ionescu; Manjusha Keni; Alan Kirk; Pek Koh; Kelvin Lau; Talal Mansy; Nick A Maskell; Richard Milton; Dakshinamoorthy Muthukumar; Tony Pope; Amy Roy; Riyaz Shah; Jonathan Shamash; Zacharias Tasigiannopoulos; Paul Taylor; Sarah Treece; Kate Ashton; Rosie Harris; Katherine Joyce; Barbara Warnes; Nicola Mills; Elizabeth A Stokes; Chris Rogers
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Discussing surgical innovation with patients: a qualitative study of surgeons' and governance representatives' views.

Authors:  Jesmond Zahra; Sangeetha Paramasivan; Natalie S Blencowe; Sian Cousins; Kerry Avery; Johnny Mathews; Barry G Main; Angus G K McNair; Robert Hinchliffe; Jane M Blazeby; Daisy Elliott
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.