| Literature DB >> 30791749 |
Ghulam Rasool1, Arif Muhammad Khan2, Raza Mohy-Ud-Din3, Muhammad Riaz1.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is an important public health issue around the globe which is a chronic infectious disease and is still one of the major challenges for developing countries. The emergence of drug-resistant TB makes the condition worse and there is an urgent need of fast, highly sensitive diagnostic methods. This study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of GeneXpert® MTB/RIF assay and MTB culture for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) in sputum smear-negative pulmonary TB/drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) suspects. A total of 168 sputum smear-negative TB suspects were recruited for the study. Among the suspected TB cases, 52.98% were male and 47.02% were females with the mean age of 42 ± 17.6 years. All the sputum specimens collected from the study population were subjected to Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) smear microscopy, GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, and MTB culture. The results revealed that, out of 168 acid-fast bacilli (AFB)/ZN smear microscopy-negative sputum specimens, 48 (28.57%) and 58 (34.52%) were detected MTB positive by GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and MTB culture, respectively, while 120 (71.43%) and 110 (65.48%) suspected TB cases were confirmed negative by GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay and MTB culture, respectively. The study concluded that GeneXpert assay was found to be a rapid and accurate tool for MTB detection in smear-negative sputum specimens. GeneXpert has advantage over ZN smear microscopy and MTB culture as it detects MTB and rifampicin resistance simultaneously within 2 h with minimal biohazards.Entities:
Keywords: AFB-negative smears; GeneXpert assay; MTB culture; pulmonary tuberculosis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30791749 PMCID: PMC6360468 DOI: 10.1177/2058738419827174
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol ISSN: 0394-6320 Impact factor: 3.219
Figure 1.Different procedural steps in the Xpert MTB/RIF assay process.[6]
Figure 2.Diagrammatic representation of study subjects among different age groups.
Figure 3.Frequency distribution graph showing the locality of participants in the study population.
Comparison between ZN/AFB smear microscopy, GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay, and MTB culture of study subjects.
| Result/method | ZN/AFB smear microscopy | GeneXpert MTB/RIF assay | MTB culture on LJ medium |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive | 0 | 48 (28.57%) | 58 (34.52%) |
| Negative | 168 (100%) | 120 (71.43%) | 110 (65.48%) |
| Total | 168 (100%) | 168 (100%) | 168 (100%) |
ZN/AFB: Ziehl–Neelsen/ acid-fast bacilli; LJ: Lowenstein–Jensen.