| Literature DB >> 30791583 |
Íñigo López Boadella1, Fernando López Gayarre2, Jesús Suárez González3, José Manuel Gómez-Soberón4, Carlos López-Colina Pérez5, Miguel Serrano López6, Jorge de Brito7.
Abstract
This study analyzes the effect of using waste by-products generated in the process of granite cutting as part of the granular structure of Ultra High Performance Concrete (UHPC). The manufactured concrete has a compressive strength greater than 115 MPa. This study substitutes 35%, 70% and 100% of the volume of micronized quartz powder (<40 μm) with granite cutting waste. This is an innovative study where the feasibility of using waste from granite quarries as a replacement for micronized quartz in UHPC has been analyzed. The results show an improvement in the workability and compressive strength of UHPC, for all substitution ratios. The flexural strength and tensile strength increase when the substitution ratio is 35%, and even the values obtained for 100% substitution are acceptable. In view of the results obtained in this study, granite cutting waste, instead of the micronized quartz powder usually used, is a viable alternative for the manufacture of expectedly more sustainable UHPC.Entities:
Keywords: granite cutting waste; recycled concrete; steel fibers; ultra high performance concrete
Year: 2019 PMID: 30791583 PMCID: PMC6416720 DOI: 10.3390/ma12040634
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Cement properties.
| CEM I 42.5 R-SR | |
|---|---|
| L.O.I. | ≤5.0% |
| Insoluble residue | ≤5.0% |
| Sulphates | ≤3.5% |
| Chlorides | ≤0.10% |
| 2-day compressive strength | 20.0 MPa |
| 28-day compressive strength | ≥42.5 MPa |
| ≥62.5 MPa | |
| Initial setting | ≥45 min |
| Le Chatelier expansion | 10 mm |
Figure 1Granite powder waste production. (a) Granite quarry; (b) process of cutting granite blocks.
Materials properties.
| Property | Silica Fume | Micronized Quartz | Granite Powder | Sand 0/0.5 mm | Sand 0.5/1.6 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Density (kg/m3) | 2300 | 2609 | 2633 | 2616 | 2616 |
| Absorption at 24 h (%) | - | - | - | 0.28 | 0.53 |
| Sand equivalent, SE (10) | - | - | - | 97 | 97 |
| Humidity (%) | <3.00 | <0.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Figure 2Size distribution. (a) Granite powder, micronized quartz and silica fume; (b) coarse and fine sand.
Chemical composition (%) of micronized quartz and granite powder.
| Specimen | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | MnO | MgO | CaO | Na2O | K2O | TiO2 | P2O5 | L.O.I |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Micronized quartz | >99.3 | 0.26 | 0.05 | - | - | 0.02 | - | 0.04 | 0.05 | - | - |
| Granite powder | 76.33 | 11.87 | 2.00 | 0.02 | 0.21 | 0.43 | 2.95 | 5.05 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.77 |
UHPC composition (kg/m3).
| Material | Reference | 35% FG | 70% FG | 100% FG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cement | 800 | 800 | 800 | 800 |
| Sand 0/0.5 | 302 | 302 | 302 | 302 |
| Sand 0.5/1.6 | 565 | 565 | 565 | 565 |
| Micronized quartz | 225 | 146 | 68 | - |
| Silica fume | 175 | 175 | 175 | 175 |
| Granite powder | - | 79 | 158 | 225 |
| Water | 175 | 175 | 175 | 175 |
| Superplasticizer | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Steel fibres | 160 | 160 | 160 | 160 |
Figure 3Slump of UHPC.
Figure 4Density of UHPC.
Figure 5Compressive strength of UHPC.
Figure 6Modulus of elasticity of UHPC.
Figure 7Flexural strength of UHPC.
Figure 8Stress–strain curves and key points.
Figure 9Tensile strength of UHPC.
Figure 10SEM-BEC images of reference concrete (a) with 70% (b) and 100% (c) granite waste; Sf Steel fibre, P–pore, A–Aggregate, F–Fissure.