Literature DB >> 30789649

Association of Periosteal Sweeping vs Periosteal Preservation With Early Periorbital Sequelae Among Patients Undergoing External Perforating Osteotomy During Rhinoplasty.

Hossam El-Sisi1, Mohamed Abdelwahab1,2, Sam P Most2,3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Periorbital sequelae are a significant source of early postoperative morbidity after rhinoplasty, particularly after an osteotomy is performed.
OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative periorbital sequelae after external perforating lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty using a periosteal sweeping vs a periosteal preserving approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective cohort study conducted at a tertiary referral center located in Mansoura, Egypt, included 28 patients who underwent external perforating lateral osteotomy in open rhinoplasty between January and May 2017. EXPOSURES: Periosteal sweeping was performed on one side of the nose and periosteal preservation was performed on the other side during external perforating lateral osteotomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Periorbital sequelae, including eyelid edema, periorbital ecchymosis, and subconjunctival hemorrhage, were assessed on both sides of the face on postoperative days 1, 7, and 21 by 2 independent surgeons using the scale first proposed by Kara and Gökalan in 1999. The scales for eyelid edema ranged from 0 to 4, for ecchymosis from 0 to 4, and for subconjunctival hemorrhage from 0 to 2, with higher values indicating greater edema, ecchymosis, and hemorrhage, respectively. Differences in the 3 time points and differences between the 2 osteotomy methods were analyzed.
RESULTS: In total, 19 men and 9 women with a mean (SD) age of 23.7 (3.9) years were enrolled. All patients showed significant decreases in eyelid edema on postoperative days 7 and 21 compared with day 1 (1.71 and 1.39 vs 2.89 for the swept side, and 1.86 and 1.46 vs 2.68 for the preserved side; both P < .05) and in periorbital ecchymosis (2.02 and 1.13 vs 2.86 for swept side, and 2.05 and 1.13 vs 2.82 for the preserved side; both P < .05). A significant decrease in subconjunctival hemorrhage was observed on day 21 compared with days 1 and 7 (1.79 vs 2.11 and 2.11 for the swept side, and 1.71 vs 2.14 and 2.14 for the preserved side; both P < .05). The mean rank score for eyelid edema on day 1 for the swept side was significantly higher than that for the preserved side (33.18 vs 23.82, P = .02), and the mean rank score for periorbital ecchymosis on the swept side was significantly higher than that for the preserved side (33.59 vs 23.41, P = .01). Although both eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis appeared to remain greater on the swept side on postoperative days 7 and 21, the differences no longer reached statistical significance. Periosteal preservation was not associated with minimizing subconjunctival hemorrhage postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study suggests that lateral nasal osteotomy is associated with varying degrees of eyelid edema, periorbital ecchymosis, and subconjunctival hemorrhage. Compared with sweeping the periosteum, preserving the periosteum in an external perforating lateral osteotomy was associated with less eyelid edema and periorbital ecchymosis in the early postoperative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30789649      PMCID: PMC6537926          DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2018.1730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg        ISSN: 2168-6076            Impact factor:   4.611


  14 in total

1.  Achieving consistency in the lateral nasal osteotomy during rhinoplasty: an external perforated technique.

Authors:  R J Rohrich; J K Krueger; W P Adams; L H Hollier
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.730

2.  An update on the lateral nasal osteotomy in rhinoplasty: an anatomic endoscopic comparison of the external versus the internal approach.

Authors:  Rod J Rohrich; Jeffrey E Janis; William P Adams; Jeffery K Krueger
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Osteotomy of the nasal wall using a newly designed piezo scalpel--a cadaver study.

Authors:  Alireza Ghassemi; Andreas Prescher; Mohammad Talebzadeh; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 1.895

4.  Effect of periosteum elevation on periorbital ecchymosis in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Arfaj; Mohammed Al-Qattan; Sami Al-Harethy; Khalid Al-Zahrani
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2008-10-05       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  The lateral osteotomy in rhinoplasty: clinical and radiographic rationale for osteotome selection.

Authors:  D G Becker; R B McLaughlin; L A Loevner; A Mang
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Effects of single-dose steroid usage on edema, ecchymosis, and intraoperative bleeding in rhinoplasty.

Authors:  C O Kara; I Gökalan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 7.  A modern approach to nasal osteotomies.

Authors:  Sam P Most; Craig S Murakami
Journal:  Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.918

8.  Nasal osteotomies: a clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique.

Authors:  Joe M Gryskiewicz; Katie M Gryskiewicz
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Steroids and rhinoplasty. A double-blind study.

Authors:  D F Hoffmann; T A Cook; V C Quatela; T D Wang; P J Brownrigg; R E Brummett
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1991-09

10.  The 10-Item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for Functional and Cosmetic Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Sami P Moubayed; John P A Ioannidis; Mikhail Saltychev; Sam P Most
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Dorsal Preservation Rhinoplasty Versus Dorsal Hump Resection on the Internal Nasal Valve: a Quantitative Radiological Study.

Authors:  Mohamed A Abdelwahab; Caio A Neves; Priyesh N Patel; Sam P Most
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.326

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.