Literature DB >> 30789642

Analysis of a Systematic Review About Blue Light-Filtering Intraocular Lenses for Retinal Protection: Understanding the Limitations of the Evidence.

Laura E Downie1, Richard Wormald2,3, Jennifer Evans3, Gianni Virgili4, Peter R Keller1, John G Lawrenson5, Tianjing Li6.   

Abstract

Importance: Cataract surgery, with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, is the most common ocular surgical procedure worldwide. It has been suggested that IOLs that selectively attenuate short wavelength visible light (blue light-filtering IOLs) may be beneficial for macular health. Whether blue light-filtering IOLs impart retinal photoprotection is of public health relevance, particularly in the context of aging demographics and the increasing global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration. This review analyzes and interprets the key findings, including consideration of the implications for practice and future research, of a 2018 Cochrane systematic review that evaluated the efficacy and safety of blue light-filtering IOLs for providing protection to macular health and function. Observations: The Cochrane systematic review included 51 randomized controlled trials that were performed in 17 countries. The trials involved adults undergoing cataract surgery in which a blue light-filtering IOL was compared with an equivalent non-blue light-filtering IOL. Study follow-up periods ranged from 1 month to 5 years. Together, these studies considered clinical outcomes in more than 5000 eyes. There was limited ability to combine data across trials (to draw overall conclusions) because of the use of different measurement techniques for outcomes, incomplete reporting of data, and/or varied follow-up periods. We identified substantial shortcomings in the internal validity of many of the included studies, particularly regarding trial design, conduct, and reporting. We propose several avenues for improving the rigor of potential future research in the field, including developing a core set of outcome measures, the inclusion of sample size calculations, the masking of trial participants and outcome assessors, and prospective clinical trial registration. Conclusions and Relevance: Using blue light-filtering IOLs to impart benefits to the macula is currently not supported by the best available clinical research evidence, and it is important that clinicians are mindful of this evidence limitation when adopting these devices in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30789642      PMCID: PMC6684842          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2019.0019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  26 in total

1.  Blue-blocking IOLs vs. short-wavelength visible light: hypothesis-based vs. evidence-based medical practice.

Authors:  Martin A Mainster; Patricia L Turner
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 12.079

2.  Low-energy light bulbs, computers, tablets and the blue light hazard.

Authors:  J B O'Hagan; M Khazova; L L A Price
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Colour vision and retinal nerve fibre layer photography in patients with an Acrysof Natural intraocular lens.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Vuori; Maija Mäntyjärvi
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol Scand       Date:  2006-02

4.  Contrast sensitivity evaluation of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses 2 years after implantation.

Authors:  Aldo Caporossi; Fabrizio Casprini; Gianluca Martone; Angelo Balestrazzi; Gian Marco Tosi; Leonardo Ciompi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Registry-based randomized clinical trials--a new clinical trial paradigm.

Authors:  Stefan James; Sunil V Rao; Christopher B Granger
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 32.419

7.  Blue-light filtering ophthalmic lenses: to prescribe, or not to prescribe?

Authors:  Laura E Downie
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Short-Wavelength Light-Blocking Eyeglasses Attenuate Symptoms of Eye Fatigue.

Authors:  Jonathan B Lin; Blair W Gerratt; Carl J Bassi; Rajendra S Apte
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 9.  Blue-light filtering intraocular lenses (IOLs) for protecting macular health.

Authors:  Laura E Downie; Ljoudmila Busija; Peter R Keller
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-22

Review 10.  Routinely collected data for randomized trials: promises, barriers, and implications.

Authors:  Kimberly A Mc Cord; Rustam Al-Shahi Salman; Shaun Treweek; Heidi Gardner; Daniel Strech; William Whiteley; John P A Ioannidis; Lars G Hemkens
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.279

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Visible light. Part II: Photoprotection against visible and ultraviolet light.

Authors:  Amaris N Geisler; Evan Austin; Julie Nguyen; Iltefat Hamzavi; Jared Jagdeo; Henry W Lim
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 11.527

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.