Aluem Tark1, Mansi Agarwal1, Andrew W Dick2, Patricia W Stone1. 1. Center for Health Policy and Center for Improving Palliative Care for Vulnerable Adults with Multiple Chronic Conditions, Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, New York. 2. RAND Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) is an advance care planning tool that is designed to document end-of-life (EoL) care wishes of those living with limited life expectancies. Although positive impacts of POLST program has been studied, variations in state-specific POLST programs across the nation remain unknown. Objective: Identify state variations in POLST forms and determine if variations are associated with program maturity status. Design: Environmental scan. Measurements: Using the national POLST website, state-specific POLST program characteristics were examined. With available sample POLST forms, EoL care options were abstracted. Results: Of all 51 states (50 United States states and Washington, D.C examined), the majority (n = 48, 98%) were actively participating in POLST; 3 states (5.9%) had Mature status, 19 states and District of Columbia (39.2%) were Endorsed, 24 states were in the developing phase (47.1%), and 4 states (7.8%) were nonconforming. Forty-five states (88.2%) had forms available for review. Antibiotic and intravenous fluid options were identified in 32 (71.1%), and 33 (73.3%) POLST forms, respectively. Hospital transfer and use of oxygen were mentioned in all forms. Use of respiratory devices (i.e., continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure) were mentioned on 27 (60%) forms, whereas ventilator or intubation use were mentioned in 36 POLST forms (80%). No associations were found between POLST maturity status and provision of treatment options. Conclusions: Variations in integration of infection and symptom management options were identified. Further research is needed to determine if there are regional factors associated with provision of treatment options on POLST forms and if there are differences in actual rates of infection or symptoms reported.
Background: Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) is an advance care planning tool that is designed to document end-of-life (EoL) care wishes of those living with limited life expectancies. Although positive impacts of POLST program has been studied, variations in state-specific POLST programs across the nation remain unknown. Objective: Identify state variations in POLST forms and determine if variations are associated with program maturity status. Design: Environmental scan. Measurements: Using the national POLST website, state-specific POLST program characteristics were examined. With available sample POLST forms, EoL care options were abstracted. Results: Of all 51 states (50 United States states and Washington, D.C examined), the majority (n = 48, 98%) were actively participating in POLST; 3 states (5.9%) had Mature status, 19 states and District of Columbia (39.2%) were Endorsed, 24 states were in the developing phase (47.1%), and 4 states (7.8%) were nonconforming. Forty-five states (88.2%) had forms available for review. Antibiotic and intravenous fluid options were identified in 32 (71.1%), and 33 (73.3%) POLST forms, respectively. Hospital transfer and use of oxygen were mentioned in all forms. Use of respiratory devices (i.e., continuous positive airway pressure and bi-level positive airway pressure) were mentioned on 27 (60%) forms, whereas ventilator or intubation use were mentioned in 36 POLST forms (80%). No associations were found between POLST maturity status and provision of treatment options. Conclusions: Variations in integration of infection and symptom management options were identified. Further research is needed to determine if there are regional factors associated with provision of treatment options on POLST forms and if there are differences in actual rates of infection or symptoms reported.
Entities:
Keywords:
POLST; advance directives; environmental scan; physician orders for life-sustaining treatment; state variations
Authors: Marlena V Habal; Vaska Micevski; Sarah Greenwood; Diego H Delgado; Heather J Ross Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Patricia W Stone; Mansi Agarwal; Feifei Ye; Mark Sorbero; Susan C Miller; Andrew W Dick Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2019-06-10 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Olivia S Kates; Elizabeth M Krantz; Juhye Lee; John Klaassen; Jessica Morris; Irina Mezheritsky; Ania Sweet; Frank Tverdek; Elizabeth T Loggers; Steven A Pergam; Catherine Liu Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 4.423
Authors: Lee A Jennings; Neil S Wenger; Li-Jung Liang; Punam Parikh; David Powell; Jose J Escarce; David Zingmond Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Patricia Charlton; Terri Kean; Rebecca H Liu; Daniel A Nagel; Rima Azar; Shelley Doucet; Alison Luke; William Montelpare; Kim Mears; Leah Boulos Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Caroline J Fu; Mansi Agarwal; Leah V Estrada; Komal P Murali; Denise D Quigley; Andrew W Dick; Patricia W Stone Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2020-10-28 Impact factor: 2.500