Torbjörn Thulin1, Ulf Hammar2, Anders Ekbom1, Rolf Hultcrantz3, Anna M Forsberg1. 1. Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 2. Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. 3. Department of Medicine, Huddinge, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
Background: The rates of perforation and bleeding are important quality measures of colonoscopy performance. Objective: The objective of this article is to assess the frequency of colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation in Swedish counties and to relate these findings to patient characteristics. Method: Data on 593,308 colonoscopies performed on adults from 2001 to 2013 were retrieved from Swedish inpatient and outpatient registers. Covariates were assessed in a multivariate Poisson regression model. The correlation between perforation and bleeding was calculated with Pearson's bivariate correlation formula. Results: The relative frequency of bleeding and perforation vary across counties (bleeding: 0.02%-0.27%; perforation: 0.02%-0.27%). There were significant positive correlations between the relative frequency of bleeding and perforation at the county level, both including (r = 0.792, p < 0.001) and excluding polypectomies r = 0.814 (p < 0.001). The relative risks of these conditions in the counties ranged from 0.12, p < 0.001, to 1.53, p = 0.05 (bleeding) and from 0.17, p = 0.002, to 2.42, p < 0.001 (perforation). Conclusions: There are substantial differences in colonoscopy performance in Sweden. These differences do not seem to be explained by patient characteristics.
Background: The rates of perforation and bleeding are important quality measures of colonoscopy performance. Objective: The objective of this article is to assess the frequency of colonoscopy-related bleeding and perforation in Swedish counties and to relate these findings to patient characteristics. Method: Data on 593,308 colonoscopies performed on adults from 2001 to 2013 were retrieved from Swedish inpatient and outpatient registers. Covariates were assessed in a multivariate Poisson regression model. The correlation between perforation and bleeding was calculated with Pearson's bivariate correlation formula. Results: The relative frequency of bleeding and perforation vary across counties (bleeding: 0.02%-0.27%; perforation: 0.02%-0.27%). There were significant positive correlations between the relative frequency of bleeding and perforation at the county level, both including (r = 0.792, p < 0.001) and excluding polypectomies r = 0.814 (p < 0.001). The relative risks of these conditions in the counties ranged from 0.12, p < 0.001, to 1.53, p = 0.05 (bleeding) and from 0.17, p = 0.002, to 2.42, p < 0.001 (perforation). Conclusions: There are substantial differences in colonoscopy performance in Sweden. These differences do not seem to be explained by patient characteristics.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adverse events; colonoscopy; colonoscopy quality; national population-based; register-based
Authors: Nancy N Baxter; Joan L Warren; Michael J Barrett; Therese A Stukel; V Paul Doria-Rose Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-06-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Steve Halligan; Douglas G Altman; Stuart A Taylor; Susan Mallett; Jonathan J Deeks; Clive I Bartram; Wendy Atkin Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ankie Reumkens; Eveline J A Rondagh; C Minke Bakker; Bjorn Winkens; Ad A M Masclee; Silvia Sanduleanu Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2016-06-14 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Barbara Bielawska; Andrew G Day; David A Lieberman; Lawrence C Hookey Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Linda Rabeneck; Lawrence F Paszat; Robert J Hilsden; Refik Saskin; Des Leddin; Eva Grunfeld; Elaine Wai; Meredith Goldwasser; Rinku Sutradhar; Therese A Stukel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2008-09-13 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Jonas F Ludvigsson; Eva Andersson; Anders Ekbom; Maria Feychting; Jeong-Lim Kim; Christina Reuterwall; Mona Heurgren; Petra Otterblad Olausson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-06-09 Impact factor: 3.295