Literature DB >> 30786835

SDF-1 plasmid treatment for patients with peripheral artery disease (STOP-PAD): Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Mehdi H Shishehbor1, John Rundback2, Matthew Bunte3, Tarek A Hammad4, Leslie Miller5, Parag D Patel5, Saihari Sadanandan6, Michael Fitzgerald7, Joseph Pastore7, Vikram Kashyap1, Timothy D Henry8.   

Abstract

The efficacy of biologic therapies in critical limb ischemia (CLI) remains elusive, in part, due to limitations in trial design and patient selection. Using a novel design, we examined the impact of complementing revascularization therapy with intramuscular JVS-100 - a non-viral gene therapy that activates endogenous regenerative repair pathways. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 2B trial, we randomized 109 patients with CLI (Rutherford class V or VI) to 8 mg or 16 mg intramuscular injections of placebo versus JVS-100. Patients were eligible if they persistently had reduced forefoot perfusion, by toe-brachial index (TBI) or skin perfusion pressure (SPP), following successful revascularization with angiographic demonstration of tibial arterial flow to the ankle. The primary efficacy end point was a 3-month wound healing score assessed by an independent wound core laboratory. The primary safety end point was major adverse limb events (MALE). Patients' mean age was 71 years, 33% were women, 79% had diabetes, and 8% had end-stage renal disease. TBI after revascularization was 0.26, 0.27, and 0.26 among the three groups (placebo, 8 mg, and 16 mg injections, respectively). Only 26% of wounds completely healed at 3 months, without any differences between the three groups (26.5%, 26.5%, and 25%, respectively). Similarly, there were no significant changes in TBI at 3 months. Three (2.8%) patients died and two (1.8%) had major amputations. Rates of MALE at 3 months were 8.8%, 20%, and 8.3%, respectively. While safe, JVS-100 failed to improve wound healing or hemodynamic measures at 3 months. Only one-quarter of CLI wounds healed at 3 months despite successful revascularization, highlighting the need for additional research in therapies that can improve microcirculation in these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02544204.

Entities:  

Keywords:  amputation; biological therapies; critical limb ischemia (CLI); lower extremity wound (ulcer); microcirculation; peripheral artery disease (PAD); randomized controlled trials (RCT); revascularization; toe–brachial index (TBI)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30786835     DOI: 10.1177/1358863X18817610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Med        ISSN: 1358-863X            Impact factor:   3.239


  5 in total

Review 1.  Vascular Regeneration in Peripheral Artery Disease.

Authors:  John P Cooke; Shu Meng
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 8.311

2.  Stromal cell derived factor 1 plasmid to regenerate the anal sphincters.

Authors:  Li Sun; Alanna Billups; Anna Rietsch; Margot S Damaser; Massarat Zutshi
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.323

3.  SDF-1α Gene-Activated Collagen Scaffold Restores Pro-Angiogenic Wound Healing Features in Human Diabetic Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.

Authors:  Ashang L Laiva; Fergal J O'Brien; Michael B Keogh
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-02-06

4.  Comprehensive Assessment of Current Management Strategies for Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Authors:  Shirli Tay; Sami Abdulnabi; Omar Saffaf; Nikolai Harroun; Chao Yang; Clay F Semenkovich; Mohamed A Zayed
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2021-10

Review 5.  Overcoming ischemia in the diabetic foot: Minimally invasive treatment options.

Authors:  Stavros Spiliopoulos; Georgios Festas; Ioannis Paraskevopoulos; Martin Mariappan; Elias Brountzos
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2021-12-15
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.