Literature DB >> 30786249

An industry perspective: A streamlined screening strategy using alternative models for chemical assessment of developmental neurotoxicity.

Jinpeng Li1, Raja Settivari1, Matthew J LeBaron1, M Sue Marty2.   

Abstract

Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) is an important endpoint for the safety assessment of chemicals. However, the current in vivo animal model for DNT assessment is resource-intensive and may not fully capture all mechanisms that may be relevant to DNT in humans. As a result, there is a growing need for more reliable, time- and cost-efficient approaches for DNT evaluation. Toward this end, many stem/progenitor cell-based in vitro models and alternative organism-based models are becoming available with the potential for high throughput screening of DNT. Meanwhile, with advances in the knowledgebase of DNT molecular mechanisms and the identification of DNT-related adverse outcome pathways (AOP) there is potential to develop a mechanism-based integrated testing strategy for DNT assessment. This review summarizes the state of science regarding currently available human stem/progenitor cell-based in vitro models and alternative organism-based models that could be used for DNT testing. In addition, the current knowledge regarding DNT AOPs is reviewed to identify common key events that could serve as critical endpoints to assess multiple AOPs that underlie DNT. Following the identification of common key events, a streamlined strategy is proposed using alternative models to assess the DNT potential of chemicals as an early screening approach for chemicals in development.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AOP; Alternative model; DNT; Developmental neurotoxicology; Key event; Neurodevelopment; Screening strategy

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30786249     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuro.2019.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  14 in total

1.  A locust embryo as predictive developmental neurotoxicity testing system for pioneer axon pathway formation.

Authors:  Karsten Bode; Maja Bohn; Jennifer Reitmeier; Philine Betker; Michael Stern; Gerd Bicker
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 5.153

2.  Application of the adverse outcome pathway concept for investigating developmental neurotoxicity potential of Chinese herbal medicines by using human neural progenitor cells in vitro.

Authors:  Jördis Klose; Lu Li; Xiaohui Fan; Ellen Fritsche; Melanie Pahl; Farina Bendt; Ulrike Hübenthal; Christian Jüngst; Patrick Petzsch; Astrid Schauss; Karl Köhrer; Ping Chung Leung; Chi Chiu Wang; Katharina Koch; Julia Tigges
Journal:  Cell Biol Toxicol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 6.691

3.  Current status and future directions for a neurotoxicity hazard assessment framework that integrates in silico approaches.

Authors:  Kevin M Crofton; Arianna Bassan; Mamta Behl; Yaroslav G Chushak; Ellen Fritsche; Jeffery M Gearhart; Mary Sue Marty; Moiz Mumtaz; Manuela Pavan; Patricia Ruiz; Magdalini Sachana; Rajamani Selvam; Timothy J Shafer; Lidiya Stavitskaya; David T Szabo; Steven T Szabo; Raymond R Tice; Dan Wilson; David Woolley; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2022-03-17

4.  In silico prediction of parkinsonian motor deficits-related neurotoxicants based on the adverse outcome pathway concept.

Authors:  Hung-Lin Kan; Chun-Wei Tung; Shao-En Chang; Ying-Chi Lin
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.168

5.  Time and space-resolved quantification of plasma membrane sialylation for measurements of cell function and neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Petra Kranaster; Christiaan Karreman; Jeremias E G A Dold; Alice Krebs; Melina Funke; Anna-Katharina Holzer; Stefanie Klima; Johanna Nyffeler; Stefan Helfrich; Valentin Wittmann; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 6.  Quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) models for toxicity prediction.

Authors:  Nicoleta Spinu; Mark T D Cronin; Steven J Enoch; Judith C Madden; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  Generation of a Triple-Transgenic Zebrafish Line for Assessment of Developmental Neurotoxicity during Neuronal Differentiation.

Authors:  Junko Koiwa; Takashi Shiromizu; Yuka Adachi; Makoto Ikejiri; Kaname Nakatani; Toshio Tanaka; Yuhei Nishimura
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-24

8.  Gene-Environment Interactions in Developmental Neurotoxicity: a Case Study of Synergy between Chlorpyrifos and CHD8 Knockout in Human BrainSpheres.

Authors:  Sergio Modafferi; Xiali Zhong; Andre Kleensang; Yohei Murata; Francesca Fagiani; David Pamies; Helena T Hogberg; Vittorio Calabrese; Herbert Lachman; Thomas Hartung; Lena Smirnova
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Scanning laser optical tomography resolves developmental neurotoxic effects on pioneer neurons.

Authors:  Karsten Bode; Lena Nolte; Hannes Kamin; Michael Desens; Arthur Ulmann; Gregor A Bergmann; Philine Betker; Jennifer Reitmeier; Tammo Ripken; Michael Stern; Heiko Meyer; Gerd Bicker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The potential of mechanistic information organised within the AOP framework to increase regulatory uptake of the developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) in vitro battery of assays.

Authors:  Magdalini Sachana; Catherine Willett; Francesca Pistollato; Anna Bal-Price
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.