Literature DB >> 30786081

Undiagnosed delirium is frequent and difficult to predict: Results from a prevalence survey of a tertiary hospital.

Peter W Lange1, Marissa Lamanna1, Rosie Watson1, Andrea B Maier1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To study the prevalence and determinants of undiagnosed delirium in a tertiary hospital.
BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common inpatient condition. It is frequently undiagnosed in a variety of settings, but determinants of undiagnosed delirium are largely unknown, and the frequency of undiagnosed delirium across all inpatient units is uncertain. The utility of hospital-wide screening then is also uncertain.
METHODS: Hospital-wide prevalence study conducted over 4 months, using a chart-based method. Gender, age, admitting unit, history of dementia and comorbidity were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to search for differences in patients with no delirium, with undiagnosed delirium and with diagnosed delirium. Sensitivity, specificity and number needed to screen were calculated from proportions in each group. Study was conducted in concordance with STROBE guidelines.
RESULTS: Delirium was prevalent in 12.5% of all patients and undiagnosed in 24.1% of patients. Only age ≥65 years and a history of dementia predicted delirium, and undiagnosed delirium in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Age ≥65 years accounts for 92.3% sensitivity and 50.8% specificity for undiagnosed delirium in this group. History of dementia had a 23.0% sensitivity and 97.0% specificity. Twenty-eight patients would need to be screened to detect a case of undiagnosed delirium. DISCUSSION: There was a high rate of delirium and undiagnosed delirium in this cohort. Known risk factors for delirium also independently predict undiagnosed delirium; other factors were not found.
CONCLUSION: Undiagnosed delirium is common and difficult to predict from patient baseline characteristics other than age. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Assessment of all inpatients for delirium is recommended.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delirium; delirium diagnosis; delirium epidemiology; delirium prevention and control; undiagnosed delirium

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30786081     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  5 in total

1.  Positive scores on the 4AT delirium assessment tool at hospital admission are linked to mortality, length of stay and home time: two-centre study of 82,770 emergency admissions.

Authors:  Atul Anand; Michael Cheng; Temi Ibitoye; Alasdair M J Maclullich; Emma R L C Vardy
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 10.668

2.  Evaluation of a co-produced delirium awareness programme for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: a pre-test/post-test study.

Authors:  Gary Mitchell; Clare McVeigh; Susan Carlisle; Christine Brown-Wilson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2020-04-26

3.  Diagnostic Test Accuracy of the 4AT for Delirium Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Eunhye Jeong; Jinkyung Park; Juneyoung Lee
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Evaluation of a delirium awareness podcast for undergraduate nursing students in Northern Ireland: a pre-/post-test study.

Authors:  Gary Mitchell; Jessica Scott; Gillian Carter; Christine Brown Wilson
Journal:  BMC Nurs       Date:  2021-01-13

5.  [Prevalence of cognitive impairments in acute nursing care-Analysis and comparison of routine data].

Authors:  Tobias Mai; Christa Flerchinger
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 1.281

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.