Literature DB >> 30785671

Periosteum-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells in engineered implants promote fracture healing in a critical-size defect rat model.

Ana B González-Gil1, José M Lamo-Espinosa1, Emma Muiños-López2, Purificación Ripalda-Cemboráin1, Gloria Abizanda2, José Valdés-Fernández2, Tania López-Martínez2, María Flandes-Iparraguirre3, Ion Andreu3, María Reyes Elizalde3,4, Kai Stuckensen5, Jürgen Groll5, Elena M De-Juan-Pardo6, Felipe Prósper1,2,7, Froilán Granero-Moltó1,2.   

Abstract

An attractive alternative to bone autografts is the use of autologous mesenchymal progenitor cells (MSCs) in combination with biomaterials. We compared the therapeutic potential of different sources of mesenchymal stem cells in combination with biomaterials in a bone nonunion model. A critical-size defect was created in Sprague-Dawley rats. Animals were divided into six groups, depending on the treatment to be applied: bone defect was left empty (CTL); treated with live bone allograft (LBA); hrBMP-2 in collagen scaffold (CSBMP2 ); acellular polycaprolactone scaffold (PCL group); PCL scaffold containing periosteum-derived MSCs (PCLPMSCs ) and PCL containing bone marrow-derived MSCs (PCLBMSCs ). To facilitate cell tracking, both MSCs and bone graft were isolated from green fluorescent protein (GFP)-transgenic rats. CTL group did not show any signs of healing during the radiological follow-up (n = 6). In the LBA group, all the animals showed bone bridging (n = 6) whereas in the CSBMP2 group, four out of six animals demonstrated healing. In PCL and PCLPMSCs groups, a reduced number of animals showed radiological healing, whereas no healing was detected in the PCLBMSCs group. Using microcomputed tomography, the bone volume filling the defect was quantified, showing significant new bone formation in the LBA, CSBMP2 , and PCLPMSCs groups when compared with the CTL group. At 10 weeks, GFP positive cells were detected only in the LBA group and restricted to the outer cortical bone in close contact with the periosteum. Tracking of cellular implants demonstrated significant survival of the PMSCs when compared with BMSCs. In conclusion, PMSCs improve bone regeneration being suitable for mimetic autograft design.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomaterials; bone regeneration; mesenchymal progenitor cells; mimetic autografts

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30785671     DOI: 10.1002/term.2821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1932-6254            Impact factor:   3.963


  4 in total

1.  Nanohydroxyapatite, Nanosilicate-Reinforced Injectable, and Biomimetic Gelatin-Methacryloyl Hydrogel for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Zhe Shi; Qiang Zhong; Yuhang Chen; Jian Gao; Xin Pan; Qiang Lian; Rong Chen; Pinkai Wang; Jian Wang; Zhanjun Shi; Hao Cheng
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2021-08-16

Review 2.  Polycaprolactone as biomaterial for bone scaffolds: Review of literature.

Authors:  Ruby Dwivedi; Sumit Kumar; Rahul Pandey; Aman Mahajan; Deepti Nandana; Dhirendra S Katti; Divya Mehrotra
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2019-11-05

Review 3.  Oral Bone Tissue Regeneration: Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Secretome, and Biomaterials.

Authors:  Agnese Gugliandolo; Luigia Fonticoli; Oriana Trubiani; Thangavelu S Rajan; Guya D Marconi; Placido Bramanti; Emanuela Mazzon; Jacopo Pizzicannella; Francesca Diomede
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Periosteum progenitors could stimulate bone regeneration in aged murine bone defect model.

Authors:  Han Xiao; Linfeng Wang; Tao Zhang; Can Chen; Huabin Chen; Shengcan Li; Jianzhong Hu; Hongbin Lu
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.310

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.