K Xing1, G Huang1, S Hua2, G Xu3, M Li4. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 2. Department of Rheumatism and Immunity Branch, Xi an No. 5 Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China. 4. Department of Paediatric Orthopedics, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, College of Medicine, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in osteomyelitis treatment among people with diabetes. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, AMED, Web of Science, the WHO trial registry, Cochrane library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov, in addition to hand-searching, was undertaken in July 2018. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The studies' methodological quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials, with 393 participants in total, were included. The antibiotic regimens, treatments and follow-up durations varied among the trials. The total scores showed that the overall methodological quality of the seven studies was high, despite two studies showing some flaws in double-blinding and withdrawals/drop-outs. Of four studies comparing different antibiotic regimens, three implied a similar remission effect, while one implied that ertapenem ± vancomycin treatment showed a higher remission rate than tigecycline treatment; this conclusion was not robust because of low power and small sample size. In the other three studies, which included two different doses of ciprofloxacin, an antibiotics group and a conservative surgical group, and two durations of the same antibiotic strategy, no significant differences in remission were reported between the groups. No difference was observed in the analyses of microbiological outcomes, superinfections and relapse, except adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There is no definitive evidence supporting the superiority of any particular antibiotic agent, dose, or administration duration in the treatment of osteomyelitis in diabetes. As the included studies had some flaws and limitations, further research is necessary.
AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic therapy in osteomyelitis treatment among people with diabetes. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, AMED, Web of Science, the WHO trial registry, Cochrane library databases, and ClinicalTrials.gov, in addition to hand-searching, was undertaken in July 2018. Two reviewers independently extracted data. The studies' methodological quality was assessed using the modified Jadad scale. Descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials, with 393 participants in total, were included. The antibiotic regimens, treatments and follow-up durations varied among the trials. The total scores showed that the overall methodological quality of the seven studies was high, despite two studies showing some flaws in double-blinding and withdrawals/drop-outs. Of four studies comparing different antibiotic regimens, three implied a similar remission effect, while one implied that ertapenem ± vancomycin treatment showed a higher remission rate than tigecycline treatment; this conclusion was not robust because of low power and small sample size. In the other three studies, which included two different doses of ciprofloxacin, an antibiotics group and a conservative surgical group, and two durations of the same antibiotic strategy, no significant differences in remission were reported between the groups. No difference was observed in the analyses of microbiological outcomes, superinfections and relapse, except adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: There is no definitive evidence supporting the superiority of any particular antibiotic agent, dose, or administration duration in the treatment of osteomyelitis in diabetes. As the included studies had some flaws and limitations, further research is necessary.
Authors: Robert J Commons; James Charles; Jane Cheney; Sarah A Lynar; Matthew Malone; Edward Raby Journal: J Foot Ankle Res Date: 2022-06-09 Impact factor: 3.050