T Scott Stroup1, Tobias Gerhard2, Stephen Crystal2, Cecilia Huang2, Zhiqiang Tan3, Melanie M Wall1, Chacku Mathai4, Mark Olfson1. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York. 2. Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey. 3. Department of Statistics and Biostatistics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey. 4. Mental Health Association of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Abstract
Importance: People with schizophrenia are commonly treated with psychotropic medications in addition to antipsychotics, but there is little evidence about the comparative effectiveness of these adjunctive treatment strategies. Objective: To study the comparative real-world effectiveness of adjunctive psychotropic treatments for patients with schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study used US national Medicaid data from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2010, to examine the outcomes of initiating treatment with an antidepressant, a benzodiazepine, a mood stabilizer, or another antipsychotic among adult outpatients (aged 18-64 years) diagnosed with schizophrenia who were stably treated with a single antipsychotic. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate propensity scores to balance covariates across the 4 medication groups. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare treatment outcomes during 365 days on an intention-to-treat basis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of hospitalization for a mental disorder (primary), emergency department (ED) visits for a mental disorder, and all-cause mortality. Results: The study cohort included 81 921 adult outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia (mean [SD] age, 40.7 [12.4] years; 37 515 women [45.8%]) who were stably treated with a single antipsychotic and then initiated use of an antidepressant (n = 31 117), a benzodiazepine (n = 11 941), a mood stabilizer (n = 12 849), or another antipsychotic (n = 26 014) (reference treatment). Compared with initiating use of another antipsychotic, initiating use of an antidepressant was associated with a lower risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88) of psychiatric hospitalization, whereas initiating use of a benzodiazepine was associated with a higher risk (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15); the risk associated with initiating use of a mood stabilizer (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.03) was not significantly different from initiating use of another antipsychotic. A similar pattern of associations was observed in psychiatric ED visits for initiating use of an antidepressant (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96), a benzodiazepine (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19), and a mood stabilizer (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04). Initiating use of a mood stabilizer was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66). Conclusions and Relevance: In the treatment of schizophrenia, initiating adjunctive treatment with an antidepressant was associated with reduced risk of psychiatric hospitalization and ED visits compared with initiating use of alternative psychotropic medications. Associations of benzodiazepines and mood stabilizers with poorer outcomes warrant clinical caution and further investigation.
Importance: People with schizophrenia are commonly treated with psychotropic medications in addition to antipsychotics, but there is little evidence about the comparative effectiveness of these adjunctive treatment strategies. Objective: To study the comparative real-world effectiveness of adjunctive psychotropic treatments for patients with schizophrenia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This comparative effectiveness study used US national Medicaid data from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2010, to examine the outcomes of initiating treatment with an antidepressant, a benzodiazepine, a mood stabilizer, or another antipsychotic among adult outpatients (aged 18-64 years) diagnosed with schizophrenia who were stably treated with a single antipsychotic. Data analysis was performed from January 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018. Multinomial logistic regression models were used to estimate propensity scores to balance covariates across the 4 medication groups. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare treatment outcomes during 365 days on an intention-to-treat basis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Risk of hospitalization for a mental disorder (primary), emergency department (ED) visits for a mental disorder, and all-cause mortality. Results: The study cohort included 81 921 adult outpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia (mean [SD] age, 40.7 [12.4] years; 37 515 women [45.8%]) who were stably treated with a single antipsychotic and then initiated use of an antidepressant (n = 31 117), a benzodiazepine (n = 11 941), a mood stabilizer (n = 12 849), or another antipsychotic (n = 26 014) (reference treatment). Compared with initiating use of another antipsychotic, initiating use of an antidepressant was associated with a lower risk (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.88) of psychiatric hospitalization, whereas initiating use of a benzodiazepine was associated with a higher risk (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.02-1.15); the risk associated with initiating use of a mood stabilizer (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94-1.03) was not significantly different from initiating use of another antipsychotic. A similar pattern of associations was observed in psychiatric ED visits for initiating use of an antidepressant (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.88-0.96), a benzodiazepine (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19), and a mood stabilizer (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.94-1.04). Initiating use of a mood stabilizer was associated with an increased risk of mortality (HR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66). Conclusions and Relevance: In the treatment of schizophrenia, initiating adjunctive treatment with an antidepressant was associated with reduced risk of psychiatric hospitalization and ED visits compared with initiating use of alternative psychotropic medications. Associations of benzodiazepines and mood stabilizers with poorer outcomes warrant clinical caution and further investigation.
Authors: Elisabetta Patorno; Rhonda L Bohn; Peter M Wahl; Jerry Avorn; Amanda R Patrick; Jun Liu; Sebastian Schneeweiss Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: B Galling; J A Vernon; A K Pagsberg; A Wadhwa; E Grudnikoff; A J Seidman; M Tsoy-Podosenin; M Poyurovsky; J M Kane; C U Correll Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Robert W Buchanan; Julie Kreyenbuhl; Deanna L Kelly; Jason M Noel; Douglas L Boggs; Bernard A Fischer; Seth Himelhoch; Beverly Fang; Eunice Peterson; Patrick R Aquino; William Keller Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Jari Tiihonen; Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz; Minna Torniainen; Kristina Alexanderson; Antti Tanskanen Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-12-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Christoph U Correll; Christine Rummel-Kluge; Caroline Corves; John M Kane; Stefan Leucht Journal: Schizophr Bull Date: 2008-04-15 Impact factor: 9.306
Authors: Marvin S Swartz; H Ryan Wagner; Jeffrey W Swanson; T Scott Stroup; Joseph P McEvoy; Fred Reimherr; Del D Miller; Mark McGee; Ahsan Khan; Jose M Canive; Sonia M Davis; John K Hsiao; Jeffrey A Lieberman Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2008-01-11 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Brandee Feola; Kristan Armstrong; Neil D Woodward; Stephan Heckers; Jennifer Urbano Blackford Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2019-03-11 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Jenni Ilomäki; J Simon Bell; Adrienne Y L Chan; Anna-Maija Tolppanen; Hao Luo; Li Wei; Edward Chia-Cheng Lai; Ju-Young Shin; Giorgia De Paoli; Romin Pajouheshnia; Frederick K Ho; Lorenna Reynolds; Kui Kai Lau; Stephen Crystal; Wallis C Y Lau; Kenneth K C Man; Ruth Brauer; Esther W Chan; Chin-Yao Shen; Ju Hwan Kim; Terry Y S Lum; Sirpa Hartikainen; Marjaana Koponen; Evelien Rooke; Marloes Bazelier; Olaf Klungel; Soko Setoguchi; Jill P Pell; Sharon Cook; Ian C K Wong Journal: CNS Drugs Date: 2020-09 Impact factor: 5.749