Literature DB >> 30785510

Ursodeoxycholic acid in the prevention of gallstones in patients subjected to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass1.

Francisco Heine Ferreira Machado1, Heladio Feitosa de Castro Filho2, Rodrigo Feitosa de Albuquerque Lima Babadopulos3, Hermano Alexandre Lima Rocha4, José Lima de Carvalho Rocha5, Manoel Odorico de Moraes Filho6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the contribution of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) in the first 12 months after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the prevention of gallstone formation.
METHODS: A community-based clinical trial was conducted. A total of 137 patients were included in the study; 69 were treated with UDCA, starting 30 days after the surgery, at a dose of 150 mg twice daily (300 mg/day) over a period of 5 consecutive months (GROUP A), and 68 were control patients (GROUP B). The patients were followed-up, and ultrasonography was performed to determine the presence of gallstones at various times during follow-up. Demographic, anthropometric and comorbid indicators were obtained. The data were subjected to normality tests and evaluated using appropriate tests.
RESULTS: Patients did not differ in their baseline characteristics. Of the 69 patients who used UDCA, only one patient developed cholelithiasis (1%), whereas 18 controls (26%) formed gallstones (OR = 24.4, p <0.001). Also, other factors were found not to influence the formation of calculi, such as pre-operative or postoperative hepatic steatosis or diabetes (p = 0.759, 0.468, 0.956).
CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated that patients who did not use UDCA showed a 24.4-fold greater probability of developing cholelithiasis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30785510      PMCID: PMC6585928          DOI: 10.1590/s0102-865020190010000009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cir Bras        ISSN: 0102-8650            Impact factor:   1.388


Introduction

Morbid obesity has reached epidemic proportions in the Western world and has high human and financial costs in the United States. It is one of the most deadly diseases in the world(1). This has resulted in a dramatic increase in surgeries, and currently more than 140,000 bariatric surgeries are performed annually in the United States alone .  In Brazil, data collected by the Family Budget Survey 2002-2003 of the Brazilian Institute of Geography showed that 38.8 million Brazilians over 20 years old were overweight, and 11% of them were classified as obese. During weight loss after bariatric surgery, the risk of developing gallstones increases and accordingly the development of complications of cholelithiasis as well. Due to the increase in gallstone disease, some centers routinely recommend prophylactic cholecystectomy. However, this practice remains controversial because not all patients develop cholelithiasis after bariatric surgery and cholecystectomy during bariatric surgery can be a difficult procedure, increasing the risks of iatrogenic bile duct injury. The alternative of prophylactic cholecystectomy without cholelithiasis is inadvisable. There are three serious complications: acute biliary pancreatitis, with morbidity and significant mortality, with biliary pancreatitis being more severe than alcoholic pancreatitis, non-suppurative cholangitis and suppurative cholangitis, with 100% mortality when only clinical treatment is performed , . Ursodiol (ursodeoxycholic acid, UDCA) is found naturally in bile acids at less than 5% in humans and at a very high percentage in bears. Following oral administration, it is absorbed, conjugated in the liver with glycine or taurine, and excreted in the bile, and conjugated UDCA enters the enterohepatic recirculation. The serum half-life is approximately 100 h. With daily administration, over a long time, UDCA constitutes 30-50% of the bile acids. UDCA lowers cholesterol concentration by reducing liver cholesterol secretion. UDCA is used for dissolution of small calculi in the gallbladder in patients with asymptomatic cholelithiasis, in those symptomatic who refuse to undergo cholecystectomy or in those with a high surgical risk. UDCA is more effective than chenodeoxycholic acid and results in a decrease in stone formation of 32% compared to 2% for placebo) by increasing the solubility of cholesterol and decreasing cholesterol saturation in the bile , . At a dose of 10 mg/kg/day for 12-14 months, dissolution was over 50% in patients with small non-calcified calculi (<5-10 mm). It is also effective in the prevention of gallstone disease in obese patients who undergo therapy with rapid weight loss. Studies show that UDCA at a dose of 13-15 mg/kg/day helps patients with early biliary cirrhosis, reducing liver function abnormalities and improving liver histology. UDCA is virtually free of adverse side effects. It is uncommon for bile salts to cause diarrhea . Considering that UDCA is effective in the dissolution of calculi and has already been recommended to reduce the incidence of stones, the aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of UDCA in preventing the formation of calculi in the postoperative period of patients subjected to bariatric surgery, during the rapid weight loss phase.

Methods

The project was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade Federal do Ceará, in compliance with the Nacional Council o Health, Resolution 466/12. Data collection only took place after approval at Plataforma Brasil, where the project was accepted under Protocol No. 1.024.054, de 26/03/2015. The study was registered in REBEC (Rede Brasileira de Ensaios Clínicos) under number U1111-1205-5877, retrospectively.

Study type and population

We conducted a comparative, prospective, community-based study consisting of a comparison of two groups: GROUP B that did not take UDCA and GROUP A that did take UDCA, which was started 30 days after the surgery (150 mg/day given twice daily) over a period of 5 consecutive months. The patients had a body mass index (BMI) greater than or equal to 40 kg/m², or they had a BMI greater than or equal to 35 kg/m² with associated severe comorbidities who failed on conservative treatment. All patients underwent a complete evaluation performed by a multidisciplinary team, and were included paired by order of inclusion. The surgical technique was strictly the same for two groups. CONSORT guidelines were followed.

Study site

This study was performed in Fortaleza-CE, from April 2015 to August 2016, in two clinics providing service in non-governmental bariatric surgery: Obesity Center and Monsenhor Bruno Clinic, which are duly authorized by the Health Department of the State of Ceará, within the established criteria By the Unified Health System to provide a High Complexity Assistance Service, in accordance with Ministerial Order No. 425/GM/MS (March 19, 2013) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health .

Study sample

The population was composed of 137 patients who underwent bariatric surgery by videolaparoscopy from January 2014 to December 2015. They were allocated into two groups: 68 patients in GROUP B and 69 patients in GROUP A, according to the clinic of reference, and data were collected in medical records.

Inclusion criteria

The following inclusion criteria were used: patients of both sexes who underwent bariatric surgery using the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass technique with videolaparoscopy from January 2014 to December 2015; over 18 years old; BMI greater than or equal to 40 kg/m2 or BMI greater than or equal to 35kg/m2 but with associated comorbidities according to criteria established by the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement of 1991 ; and no previous gallstones as evidenced by preoperative abdominal ultrasonography. The surgical technique consists of making a gastric pouch of 30-40ml, intestinal loop of 120 cm and biliary loop of 80-100cm (Fig. 1). All patients underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass by videolaparoscopy by the same surgical team, to reduce possible distortions or biases resulting from the treatment adopted.
Figure 1

Capella Operation - Gastric Bypass (without ring) - Surgical Times: Gastric Bag: 30-40cm³, Food Strap: 120-140cm (140cm: in the super-obese), Biliary Handle: 80-100cm (100cm: diabetic patients).

Exclusion criteria

Excluded from the study were patients who underwent cholecystectomy prior to bariatric surgery, patients with gallstones, participants in other investigations with investigative drugs, pregnant women, those unable to sign and informed consent form, patients without clinical conditions to participate in the study, and those who refused to participate. Regarding the therapy, patients who did not use UDCA according to the protocol or with a follow-up period of less than six months postoperatively, or who had previously used UDCA, in any way, as recorded in the medical records.

Statistical analysis

The following variables were collected: distribution of the sample for analysis according to the data of the research site, nationality, gender and marital status; distribution of the sample for analysis according to age, initial weight and weight 6 months after surgery, height, initial BMI, current BMI, difference in BMI, and weight difference, distribution of the sample for analysis according to the main comorbidities evaluated before surgery and 6 months after surgery, namely hepatic steatosis (and whether mild, moderate or severe), gastroesophageal reflux (GERD), gastritis, systemic arterial hypertension, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus 2, sleep apnea, osteoarthritis, infertility and gallstones. Abdominal ultrasonography was performed to determine the presence of gallstones at during follow-up in all patients, six months after the surgery. Categorical data were presented as percentages and counts and the numerical data as means and standard error of means. Normality tests were performed for numerical variables. Depending on the normality of the variables, ANOVA or the Mann-Whitney test was performed, as appropriate. The chi-square test was used for categorical data. The McNemar test was used for paired before and after variables. Odds ratios were calculated to measure the association of the determinants with the main outcome. p < 0.05 was considered significant. SPSS software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences), v23, SPSS, Inc. was used for the analysis and evaluation of the data obtained.

Results

In Group A, 18 (26.1%) patients were male, and in Group B, 27 (39.7%) were male (p = 0.090). The mean age of the cases was 34.18 (SD = 13.36) in group A, and the mean age was 35.91 (SD = 10.28) in group B. There was also no difference between the groups for anthropometric measures, with mean weights of 112 and 116 in the test and control groups, respectively (p = 0.377), with the same pattern for the other variables, such as hepatic steatosis (p = 0.361). Among the comorbidities, there was a higher prevalence of sleep apnea and GERD in the test group (p = 0.004 and 0.020, respectively) (Table 1). 100% of patients complied with the use of medication.
Table 1

Biological profile and previous pathologies of patients who used and did not use UDCA (Obesity Center).

  Site  
  MB Clínic Obesity Center  
  MEANSEMMEANSEMp
Age 34.1813.3635.9110.28 
Initial weight  112.0021.00116.0023.000.274
Initial height 1.630.091.660.100.147
Initial BMI 41.805.0042.205.800.718
Current BMI 27.603.8027.603.600.980
   N % N % p
GenderMale1826.1%2739.7%0.090
Hepatic steatosis before 5884.1%5377.9% 
Degree of steatosisNo1115.9%1522.1%0.739
 Mild 2434.8%1927.9% 
 Moderate2434.8%2333.8% 
 Severe1014.5%1116.2% 
GERD before 4666.7%3247.1%0.020
Gastritis before 2231.9%1522.1%0.195
Hypertension before 4058.0%3348.5%0.268
Cardiovascular disease before 34.3%11.5%0.317
Dyslipidemia before 4362.3%3652.9%0.267
Diabetes II before 2130.4%2536.8%0.433
Sleep apnea before 6695.7%5479.4%0.004
Osteoarthritis before 6492.8%6291.2%0.734
Infertility before 710.4%11.5%0.027
The medication showed a strong association with the development of cholelithiasis, as can be seen in Table 2. Of the patients in GROUP A, 68 (98.5%) did not develop gallstones, where only 1 (1.4%) patient formed gallstones. On the other hand, 50 (73.5%) patients in GROUP B did not develop gallstones, while 18 (26.4%) did, showing a statistical significance in the determination of cholelithiasis (OR = 24.4, 95% CI = 3.1-189.4, p < 0.001).
Table 2

Distribution of results in the postoperative period with comparison of the sample between patients in GROUP A and those in GROUP B.

  Postoperative cholelithiasis    
  No Yes    
  N%N%OR95%CIP
Use of medicationYes 6898.5%11.4%24.43.1-189.4<0.001
 No5073.5%1826.4%   
Other factors were tested for their influence on the formation of calculi, including anthropometric measurements before and after surgery, comorbidities such as hepatic steatosis before and after surgery, as well as occurrence of diabetes and hypertension, among others, but no other factor was associated with the formation of gallstones other than UDCA use (Table 3).
Table 3

Comparisons between patients who formed gallstones in the postoperative period according to anthropometric and comorbidities.

  Postoperative cholelithiasis      
  No Yes    
  MeanSEMMeanSEM  p
Age 35.0112.2835.259.69  0.943
Initial weight  114.0021.00116.0030.00  0.664
Initial height  1.640.091.650.10  0.657
Initial BMI 41.004.8042.308.50  0.843
Weight after surgery 75.0013.0076.0019.00  0.871
Current BMI 27.703.5027.405.20  0.767
Weight difference 38.9011.1040.7013.70  0.528
BMI difference 14.303.3014.904.50  0.536
   N % N % OR IC95% p
Hepatic steatosis beforeYes 9681.4%1578.9%1.160.26-2.840.759
 No2218.6%421.1%   
Degree of steatosisNo2218.6%421.1%--0.573
 Mild 3529.9%842.1%   
 Moderate4336.8%421.1%   
 Severe1815.3%315.8%   
Hepatic steatosis afterNo11395.80%19100%1.171.09-1.250.359
 Yes 54.20%00%   
GERD beforeNo5446.2%526.3%2.360.81-7.090.106
 Yes 6353.8%1473.7%   
GERD afterNo6698.5%1100.0%1.020.98-1.050.902
 Yes 11.5%00.0%   
Gastritis beforeNo8875.2%1263.2%1.770.64-4.920.269
 Yes 2924.8%736.8%   
Gastritis afterNo6595.6%1100.0%1.020.98-1.050.829
 Yes34.5%00.0%   
Hypertension beforeNo5446.2%1052.6%1.290.49-3.420.600
 Yes 6453.8%947.4%   
Hypertension afterNo6697.0%1100.0%1.020.98-1.050.861
 Yes23.0%00.0%   
Cardiovascular disease beforeNo11496.6%19100.0%1.171.09-1.250.413
 Yes 43.4%00.0%   
Cardiovascular disease afterNo11496.6%19100.0%1.171.09-1.250.413
 No6798.5%1100.0%1.020.98-1.050.902
 Yes11.5%00.0%   
Dyslipidemia beforeNo5143.6%736.8%1.330.48-3.610.581
 Yes 6656.4%1263.2%   
Dyslipidemia afterNo4973.1%1100.0%1.020.98-1.060.546
 Yes1926.9%00.0%   
Diabetes II beforeNo7967.5%1263.2%1.210.44-3.330.708
 Yes 3932.5%736.8%   
Diabetes II afterNo6497.0%1100.0%1.020.98-1.050.860
 Yes33.0%00.0%   
Sleep apnea beforeNo1210.2%526.3%3.120.96-10.200.062
 Yes 10689.8%1473.7%   
Sleep apnea afterNo3653.7%1100.0%1.030.97-1.080.356
 Yes3246.3%00.0%   
Osteoarthritis beforeNo97.7%210.5%1.410.28-7.090.674
 Yes 10992.3%1789.5%   
Osteoarthritis afterNo3855.9%1100.0%1.030.97-1.080.565
 Yes3044.1%00.0%   
Infertility beforeNo10994.0%1894.7%1.150.13-10.00.895
 Yes 76.0%15.3%   
Infertility afterNo6295.4%1100.0%1.020.98-1.050.826
 Yes34.6%00.0%   
Hernia postoperativeNo11496.6%19100.0%1.171.09-1.250.413
 Yes 43.4%00.0%   

Discussion

In 1980, it was routine to recommend cholecystectomy for patients undergoing bariatric surgery because of the reported high incidence (30%) of symptomatic cholelithiasis. Currently, there is no consensus on the treatment of asymptomatic cholelithiasis in patients undergoing surgery for rapid weight loss, and thus, further investigations in the form of randomized, prospective studies are needed to more clearly define the indications for cholecystectomy at the time of weight loss surgery , . A pilot study confirmed the high incidence of gallstones (71% of patients evaluated) associated with rapid weight loss in patients who underwent gastric bypass surgery , . The migration of gallstones into the common bile duct, in obese patients who have undergone bariatric surgery can lead to a complex and severe complication. That is why in these patients who are at higher perioperative risk, minimal treatment of the calculi in the common bile duct is very important. After gastric bypass, endoscopic access to the biliary tree is very difficult, but it is possible through a laparoscopy-assisted transgastric anterograde approach . Also an option to approach Vater’s papilla endoscopically in patients with a long afferent jejunal loop is to perform a surgical access through the stomach by gastrostomy, or jejunum, through a jejunostomy at the angle of Treitz (Fig. 1) . Double balloon ERCP can also be another way to access gallstones into the common bile duct . Prophylactic medication with UDCA in the prevention of gallstone formation after gastric bypass surgery may be proposed because of its effectiveness, as was shown in a systematic review and in this study . Worobetz published a double-blind study in which one group received a placebo and the other group UDCA to study the prevention of gallstone development in 29 morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery. Six of the 14 placebo-treated patients (43%) developed gallstones. None of the 10 patients treated with UDCA formed gallstones. In clinical practice, it has been observed that during rapid weight loss¸ the formation of gallstones begins to occur after only 4 weeks. Prophylactic treatment with UDCA at 600 mg/day in the six-month period after bariatric surgery has been advocated by researchers in preventing gallstones or biliary sludge, factors responsible for developing severe complications such as biliary pancreatitis , , . In this study, the group of patients who did not use UDCA were 24.1 times more likely to form cholelithiasis, with significant statistical significance (OR = 24.4, 95% CI = 3.1-189.4, p<0.001). It was also checked if there were other factors that could be confounding the result, but it was identified that no other factors were associated with the outcome. In addition to the already reported benefits, it has been highlighted in the literature that UDCA, a hydrophilic bile acid, may block the progression of non-hepatic fatty liver disease to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by protecting hepatocytes through handling bile salts in mitochondrial trauma, anti-apoptotic signaling pathway, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, immunomodulatory function, anti-fibrotic properties, and is being widely used in liver diseases - . It is worth noting that the administered doses varied among studies, and even so there was a significant effect found. Also, no studies with longer duration were found, neither with drop out of the medication, to estimate time of treatment with benefit.

Limitations

The study was conducted through a community clinical trial, which could have introduced selection bias and confusion among participants. However, these were processed during statistical analysis, which identified that the patients were fully comparable and that there was no confounding in the association of the main outcome, as well as ensuring that the surgical intervention was strictly the same in the two groups. Also, we didn´t used a placebo in the control group.

Conclusions

The effectiveness of UDCA in preventing the formation of gallstones in patients in the postoperative period of bariatric surgery when used during the rapid weight loss phase. Considering other findings in the literature and the risks of cholelithiasis complications, it is concluded that UDCA therapy may be beneficial if applied on a large scale. It is hoped that with advances with specific drugs, through research in clinical pharmacology and genetic studies, the treatment of morbidly obese patients will become more efficient.
  4 in total

1.  Gallstone Disease and Bacterial Metabolic Performance of Gut Microbiota in Middle-Aged and Older Patients.

Authors:  Doina Georgescu; Ioana Ionita; Ana Lascu; Emil-Florin Hut; Simona Dragan; Oana-Elena Ancusa; Mihai Ionita; Despina Calamar-Popovici; Liviu-Andrei Georgescu; Daniel-Florin Lighezan
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2022-06-08

2.  Increased Incidence of Symptomatic Cholelithiasis After Bariatric Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Previous Bariatric Surgery: a Single Center Experience.

Authors:  Midhat Abu Sneineh; Lotem Harel; Ahmad Elnasasra; Hadas Razin; Assaf Rotmensh; Sharon Moscovici; Hasan Kais; Haim Shirin
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Risk Factors for Symptomatic Gallstone Disease and Gallstone Formation After Bariatric Surgery.

Authors:  Sylke Haal; Maimoena S S Guman; Sjoerd Bruin; Ruben Schouten; Ruben N van Veen; Paul Fockens; Marcel G W Dijkgraaf; Barbara A Hutten; Victor E A Gerdes; Rogier P Voermans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 4.  Review of the Endoscopic, Surgical and Radiological Techniques of Treating Choledocholithiasis in Bariatric Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Patients and Proposed Management Algorithm.

Authors:  Qiuye Cheng; Amy Hort; Peter Yoon; Ken Loi
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.479

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.