Literature DB >> 30784983

Adherence to fluid resuscitation guidelines and outcomes in patients with septic shock: Reassessing the "one-size-fits-all" approach.

Tuyet-Trinh N Truong1, Andrew S Dunn2, Ken McCardle3, Allison Glasser3, Shirish Huprikar4, Hooman Poor2, Beth Raucher2, Jashvant Poeran2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Management Bundle (SEP-1) recommend rapid crystalloid infusion (≥30 mL/kg) for patients with sepsis-induced hypoperfusion or septic shock. We aimed to assess compliance with this recommendation, factors associated with non-compliance, and how compliance relates to mortality.
DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study.
SETTING: 1136-bed academic and 235-bed community hospital (January 2015-June 2016). PATIENTS: Patients with septic shock.
INTERVENTIONS: Crystalloid infusion (≥30 mL/kg) within 6 h of identification of septic shock as required by CMS. MEASUREMENTS: Associations with compliance and how compliance associates with mortality; odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) reported. MAIN
RESULTS: Overall, 1027 septic shock patients were included. Of these, 486 (47.3%) met the 6-hour 30 ml/kg fluid requirement. Compliance was lower in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) (40.9%), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (42.3%) or chronic liver disease (38.5%) and among those that were identified in the inpatient setting (35.4%) rather than in the emergency department (51.7%). When adjusting for relevant covariates, compliance (compared to non-compliance) was not associated with in-hospital mortality: OR 1.03 CI 0.76-1.41.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings question a "one-size-fits-all" approach to fluid administration and performance measures for patients with sepsis.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CHF; ESRD; Fluid resuscitation; Sepsis Core measures; Septic shock; Severe sepsis

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30784983     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Crit Care        ISSN: 0883-9441            Impact factor:   3.425


  10 in total

Review 1.  Driving blind: instituting SEP-1 without high quality outcomes data.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wang; Jeffrey R Strich; Willard N Applefeld; Junfeng Sun; Xizhong Cui; Charles Natanson; Peter Q Eichacker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Fluid resuscitation in sepsis: the great 30 mL per kg hoax.

Authors:  Paul E Marik; Liam Byrne; Frank van Haren
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  SEP-1 Has Brought Much Needed Attention to Improving Sepsis Care…But Now Is the Time to Improve SEP-1.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Jeffrey R Strich; Michael Klompas; Donald M Yealy; Henry Masur
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Fluid resuscitation and outcomes in heart failure patients with severe sepsis or septic shock: A retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  Roshan Acharya; Aakash Patel; Evan Schultz; Michael Bourgeois; Natalie Kandinata; Rishi Paswan; Smita Kafle; Yub Raj Sedhai; Usman Younus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Association of an Emergency Department-embedded Critical Care Unit with Hospital Outcomes and Intensive Care Unit Use.

Authors:  George L Anesi; Jayaram Chelluri; Zaffer A Qasim; Marzana Chowdhury; Rachel Kohn; Gary E Weissman; Brian Bayes; M Kit Delgado; Benjamin S Abella; Scott D Halpern; John C Greenwood
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2020-12

6.  An Evaluation of the Use of Aggressive Fluid Resuscitation in the Early Treatment of Sepsis Patients.

Authors:  William N Payne; Alfred Tager; Mike Broce; Dany Tager; Marion Hoy; Hythem Abad
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-02-23

7.  Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Gladis Kabil; Steven A Frost; Deborah Hatcher; Amith Shetty; Jann Foster; Stephen McNally
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2022-01-11

8.  Fluid resuscitation of at least 30 mL/kg was not associated with decreased mortality in patients with infection, signs of hypoperfusion, and a do-not-intubate order.

Authors:  Wataru Matsuda; Yumi Funato; Momoyo Miyazaki; Koichiro Tomiyama
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2022-09-30

9.  Design and Implementation of a Real-time Monitoring Platform for Optimal Sepsis Care in an Emergency Department: Observational Cohort Study.

Authors:  Andy Hung-Yi Lee; Emily Aaronson; Kathryn A Hibbert; Micah H Flynn; Hayley Rutkey; Elizabeth Mort; Jonathan D Sonis; Kyan C Safavi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Cecilia Loudet; Vanina S Kanoore Edul; Javier Osatnik; Fernando Ríos; Daniela Vásquez; Mario Pozo; Bernardo Lattanzio; Fernando Pálizas; Francisco Klein; Damián Piezny; Paolo N Rubatto Birri; Graciela Tuhay; Analía García; Analía Santamaría; Graciela Zakalik; Cecilia González; Elisa Estenssoro
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.925

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.