Literature DB >> 30784698

The Real-World Utility of the LINQ Implantable Loop Recorder in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Patients.

Vassilios J Bezzerides1, Amy Walsh1, Maria Martuscello1, Carolina A Escudero2, Kimberlee Gauvreau1, Geralyn Lam1, Dominic J Abrams1, John K Triedman1, Mark E Alexander1, Laura Bevilacqua1, Douglas Y Mah3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the practical use of the recently introduced LINQ implantable loop recorder (LINQ-ILR) in a cohort of pediatric and adult congenital arrhythmia patients.
BACKGROUND: Correlating symptoms to a causative arrhythmia is a key aspect of diagnosis and management in clinical electrophysiology.
METHODS: Retrospective review of clinical data, implantation indications, findings, and therapeutic decisions in patients who underwent LINQ-ILR implantation from April 1st, 2014 to January 30th, 2017 at Boston Children's Hospital.
RESULTS: A total of 133 patients were included, of which 76 (57%) were male. The mean age at implantation was 15.7 ± 9.1 years with a duration of follow-up of 11.8 months. Congenital heart disease was present in 34 patients (26%), a confirmed genetic diagnosis in 50 (38%), and cardiomyopathy in 22 (26%), and the remainder were without a previous diagnosis. Syncope was the most common indication for LINQ-ILR implantation, occurring in 59 patients (44%). The median time to diagnosis was 4.5 months, occurring in 78 patients (59%). Cardiac device placement occurred in 17 patients (22%), a medication change in 9 (12%), electrophysiology study/ablation in 5 (6%), or LINQ-ILR explantation in 42 (54%). Infection or erosion occurred in 5 patients. Syncope was correlated with a diagnostic transmission (54% vs. 31%, p = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The LINQ-ILR is an important diagnostic tool, providing useful data in more than one-half of patients in <6 months. Adverse events are low. Patient selection is critical and undiagnosed syncope represents an important presenting indication for which a LINQ-ILR implant should be considered.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult congenital; arrhythmias; loop recorder; pediatric

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30784698     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 2405-500X


  8 in total

1.  Implantable loop recorder for monitoring patients with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Michael Huntgeburth; Christopher Hohmann; Harald Kaemmerer; Christof Kolb; Peter Ewert; Sebastian Freilinger; Nicole Nagdyman; Rhoia Neidenbach; Lars Pieper; Felix Pieringer; Carsten Lennerz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-12

Review 2.  Subcutaneouscardiac Rhythm Monitors: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Gaurav Aggarwal; Saurabh Aggarwal; Venkata Alla; Bharat Narasimhan; Kyungmoo Ryu; Courtney Jeffery; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2021-02-28

3.  A Single-center Experience Comparing First- Versus Second-generation Insertable Cardiac Monitors in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Nathan Miller; Lisa Roelle; Dean Lorimer; Aarti S Dalal; William B Orr; George F Van Hare; Jennifer N Avari Silva
Journal:  J Innov Card Rhythm Manag       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Novel Technique for Cardiac Monitor Implantation in Pediatrics.

Authors:  Peter Woolman; Justin Yoon; Christopher Snyder
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 1.838

5.  Impact of Device Miniaturization on Insertable Cardiac Monitor Use in the Pediatric Population: An Analysis of the MarketScan Commercial and Medicaid Databases.

Authors:  Dustin Nash; Hannah Katcoff; Jennifer Faerber; V Ramesh Iyer; Maully J Shah; Michael L O'Byrne; Christopher Janson
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 6.106

6.  Implantable loop recorders in patients with heart disease: comparison between patients with and without syncope.

Authors:  Amira Assaf; Rafi Sakhi; Michelle Michels; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Judith M A Verhagen; Rohit E Bhagwandien; Tamas Szili-Torok; Dominic Theuns; Sing-Chien Yap
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-08

Review 7.  Pediatric Cardio-Oncology Medicine: A New Approach in Cardiovascular Care.

Authors:  Hugo R Martinez; Gary S Beasley; Jason F Goldberg; Mohammed Absi; Kaitlin A Ryan; Karine Guerrier; Vijaya M Joshi; Jason N Johnson; Cara E Morin; Caitlin Hurley; Ronald Ray Morrison; Parul Rai; Jane S Hankins; Michael W Bishop; Brandon M Triplett; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Ching-Hon Pui; Hiroto Inaba; Jeffrey A Towbin
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-18

8.  2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Maully J Shah; Michael J Silka; Jennifer N Avari Silva; Seshadri Balaji; Cheyenne M Beach; Monica N Benjamin; Charles I Berul; Bryan Cannon; Frank Cecchin; Mitchell I Cohen; Aarti S Dalal; Brynn E Dechert; Anne Foster; Roman Gebauer; M Cecilia Gonzalez Corcia; Prince J Kannankeril; Peter P Karpawich; Jeffery J Kim; Mani Ram Krishna; Peter Kubuš; Martin J LaPage; Douglas Y Mah; Lindsey Malloy-Walton; Aya Miyazaki; Kara S Motonaga; Mary C Niu; Melissa Olen; Thomas Paul; Eric Rosenthal; Elizabeth V Saarel; Massimo Stefano Silvetti; Elizabeth A Stephenson; Reina B Tan; John Triedman; Nicholas H Von Bergen; Philip L Wackel
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2021-07-29
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.