| Literature DB >> 30784184 |
Qiang Tian1, Fang Liu2, Zhou Xu2, Huan Liu2, Hao Yin2, Zhaolin Sun2, Mingcang Chen2, Zhixiong Li2, Lin Ma1, Chenggang Huang2.
Abstract
In this study, Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang prepared by two decoction methods, namely, combined decoction (modern decoction method) and separated decoction (traditional decoction method), was analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The acquired datasets containing sample codes, tR -m/z pairs and ion intensities were processed with multivariate statistical analyses, such as principal component analysis and an orthogonal partial least squared discriminant analysis model, to globally compare the chemical differences between the different decoction samples. Then, the chemical differences between the combined and separated decoctions were screened out by S-plots generated from the orthogonal partial least squared discriminant analysis model and compared with chemical information from an established in-house library. The six components that contributed the most to the chemical differences were identified as chlorogenic acid, caffeic acid, geniposide, genipin, scopoletin, and 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid. The concentrations of genipin and caffeic acid from the separated decoction were higher than those from the combined decoction, indicating that the separated decoction may present a stronger hepatoprotective effect. However, the results still require further investigation through pharmacological and clinical studies. Our findings not only establish a strategy to evaluate chemical consistency of Yin-Chen-Hao-Tang but also provide the scientific basis for using traditional separated decoction method.Entities:
Keywords: Traditional Chinese medicines; chemical consistency; metabolomics; quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30784184 DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201800961
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Sep Sci ISSN: 1615-9306 Impact factor: 3.645