Literature DB >> 30784152

Patients admitted to more research-active hospitals have more confidence in staff and are better informed about their condition and medication: Results from a retrospective cross-sectional study.

Leon Jonker1, Stacey Jayne Fisher1, Dave Dagnan1.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: Clinical research activity in hospitals is associated with reduced mortality and improved overall care quality. In England, the latter is a compound score of several elements and both staff and inpatient feedback form part of the Care Quality Commission (CQC) ratings. The objective of this study was to determine if NHS Trusts' National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) study activity data correlates with specific outcomes from national NHS staff and patient surveys.
METHOD: Retrospective cohort design involving data for 129 English NHS hospital Trusts, including scores from recent national NHS staff and inpatient surveys and NIHR data. Statistical approach involved Spearman correlation analyses, with cut-off P value ≤ 0.01 for qualification for subsequent principal component analysis (correlation coefficient cut-off value 0.20).
RESULTS: Outcomes of one staff survey question (staff recommendation of the organization as a place to work or receive treatment) and multiple outcomes of inpatient survey questions were positively associated with increased NIHR-adopted clinical research activity. Better quality of information provision to patients was the dominant theme, though a higher degree of observed staff teamwork, more confidence in the treating doctors, and a better overall inpatient experience also correlated significantly. The number of different studies contributed more to positive associations with survey outcomes compared with the number of recruited participants into research.
CONCLUSIONS: Survey elements of the CQC appraisal of English NHS Hospital Trusts are significantly associated with increased clinical research activity levels; it appears to drive better information provision to inpatients-particularly around medicine management-and contribute to a better inpatient experience overall, whilst staff are more likely to recommend their own organization. Despite clinical research activity forming a very small fraction of overall NHS activity, it has an indirect positive effect on staff and Trust performance that is measurable at patient level.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Care Quality Commission (CQC); NHS survey; National Health Service (NHS); National Institute for Health Research (NIHR); Summary Hospital-level Mortality Indicator (SHMI)

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30784152     DOI: 10.1111/jep.13118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  11 in total

1.  Research education and training for nurses and allied health professionals: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Olivia King; Emma West; Sarah Lee; Kristen Glenister; Claire Quilliam; Anna Wong Shee; Hannah Beks
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.263

2.  Relationship Between Research Culture and Research Activity of Medical Doctors: A Survey and Audit.

Authors:  Caitlin Brandenburg; Christy Noble; Rachel Wenke; Ian Hughes; Anthony Barrett; Jeremy Wellwood; Sharon Mickan
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2021-08-10

3.  The Status of Respiratory Care Education in Saudi Arabia: A National Survey of Program Directors.

Authors:  Mohammed A Almeshari; Ziyad Alshehri; Jaber S Alqahtani; Ali M Alasmari; Ahmed A Alzahrani; Fahad H Alahmadi; Abdullah S Alsulayyim; Faraj K Alenezi; Khalid S Alwadeai
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-06-10

4.  Informing National Health Service patients about participation in clinical research: A comparison of opt-in and opt-out approaches across the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Catherine Henshall; Jennifer Potts; Sophie Walker; Mark Hancock; Mark Underwood; Nick Broughton; Roger Ede; Catherine Kernot; Lorcan O'Neill; John R Geddes; Andrea Cipriani
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 5.744

5.  A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Mary Wells; Adine Adonis; Lee Bolton; Layla Bolton Saghdaoui; Margaret Coffey; Jennifer Crow; Olga Fadeeva Costa; Catherine Hughes; Matthew Savage; Lillie Shahabi; Caroline M Alexander
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Training and Retaining Physician-Scientists in Dermatology: A United Kingdom Perspective.

Authors:  Amaani B Hussain; Eugene Healy; Nick J Reynolds
Journal:  JID Innov       Date:  2021-12-14

7.  Exploring research capacity and culture of allied health professionals: a mixed methods evaluation.

Authors:  Terry Cordrey; Elizabeth King; Emma Pilkington; Katie Gore; Owen Gustafson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  "There hasn't been a career structure to step into": a qualitative study on perceptions of allied health clinician researcher careers.

Authors:  Caitlin Brandenburg; Elizabeth C Ward
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-01-09

9.  Implementing a novel programme for nurses and allied health professionals to develop capacity for evidence-informed clinical practice.

Authors:  Silvie Cooper; Julie Sanders; Nora Pashayan
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2021-08-05

10.  Using knowledge brokering activities to promote allied health clinicians' engagement in research: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  S Mickan; Rachel Wenke; Kelly Weir; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Christy Noble
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.