Literature DB >> 30783909

Spatial perspective taking: Effects of social, directional, and interactive cues.

Peri Gunalp1, Tara Moossaian2, Mary Hegarty2.   

Abstract

Including an avatar in the array in a spatial perspective-taking test improves performance, but it is not clear why. Different aspects of an avatar, including its directional nature, its agency (perceived ability for action), and its interactivity, may all influence perspective-taking performance. Experiment 1 examined how performance was influenced by a social directional cue (an avatar) and an abstract directional cue (an arrow). Participants performed best in the avatar condition and no better in the arrow condition than in a control condition. These results suggest that directionality of the cue alone is not sufficient to facilitate performance on this task. Experiment 2 compared an avatar to a concrete directional cue that was grounded in everyday experience interacting with objects, but was non-agentive (a chair). There was no significant difference between the avatar and the chair conditions, which both outperformed the control condition. Participants in both experiments and all conditions primarily reported utilizing mental simulation strategies that involved imagining themselves in the array of objects. The results suggest that grounding the task in everyday interactions with people or objects facilitates this mental simulation process and more generally enhances performance on perspective-taking tasks.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agency; Mental simulation; Perspective taking; Sex differences; Spatial ability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30783909     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-019-00910-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems.

Authors:  M Hegarty
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 2.  Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation.

Authors:  Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 3.  Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion.

Authors:  Paula M Niedenthal; Lawrence W Barsalou; Piotr Winkielman; Silvia Krauth-Gruber; François Ric
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Grounded cognition.

Authors:  Lawrence W Barsalou
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 24.137

5.  The embodied nature of spatial perspective taking: embodied transformation versus sensorimotor interference.

Authors:  Klaus Kessler; Lindsey Anne Thomson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-26

6.  How your hand drives my eyes.

Authors:  Marcello Costantini; Ettore Ambrosini; Pasquale Cardellicchio; Corrado Sinigaglia
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  The coding and transformation of spatial information.

Authors:  J Huttenlocher; C C Presson
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see.

Authors:  Dana Samson; Ian A Apperly; Jason J Braithwaite; Benjamin J Andrews; Sarah E Bodley Scott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Updating after rotational and translational body movements: coordinate structure of perspective space.

Authors:  C C Presson; D R Montello
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.490

10.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own?

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich; Wolfgang Prinz
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07
View more
  3 in total

1.  Impact of Spatial Orientation Ability on Air Traffic Conflict Detection in a Simulated Free Route Airspace Environment.

Authors:  Jimmy Y Zhong; Sim Kuan Goh; Chuan Jie Woo; Sameer Alam
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Directionality eclipses agency: How both directional and social cues improve spatial perspective taking.

Authors:  Peri Gunalp; Elizabeth R Chrastil; Mary Hegarty
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-25

3.  Is implicit Level-2 visual perspective-taking embodied? Spontaneous perceptual simulation of others' perspectives is not impaired by motor restriction.

Authors:  Eleanor Ward; Giorgio Ganis; Katrina L McDonough; Patric Bach
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 2.138

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.