Noa Mevorach Zussman1, Noa Gonen2, Michal Kovo2, Hadas Miremberg2, Jacob Bar2, Alexander Condrea2, Shimon Ginath2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel. noamev@gmail.com. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Ha'Lochamim 62, PO Box 5, 58100, Holon, Israel.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Protracted postpartum urinary retention (P-PUR) is a rare puerperal complication of overt urinary retention that proceeds beyond the 3rd postpartum day. Long-term consequences of P-PUR are poorly reported. The objective of the study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with P-PUR with a matched control group, using a validated pelvic floor distress questionnaire. METHODS: All medical files of women diagnosed with P-PUR between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed. The control group was comprised of women who had a consecutive birth, matched in a 1:2 ratio, by maternal age, parity, neonatal birth weight, analgesia, and route of delivery. All women were evaluated for long-term symptoms of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic-organ-prolapse-related complaints by a telephone interview, at least 1 year following their delivery, using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form (PFDI-20) questionnaire. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 27 cases of P-PUR out of 52,662 deliveries (0.051%). There were no differences between the study group (n = 27) and controls (n = 54) in age, BMI (kg/m2), parity, birth weight, route of delivery, and rate of episiotomy. The majority of patients in both groups opted for epidural analgesia. Second stage of labor was longer in the study group than in controls, 134.1 ± 74.6 min vs. 73.4 ± 71.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001. The scores of the PFDI-20, UDI-6, and POPDI-6 did not differ between the groups. However, the study group had minimally elevated scores on the CARDI-8 scale (1.0 ± 2.6 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: P-PUR is a rare postpartum complication, yet this disturbing condition has negligible if any clinical impact on long-term urogynecologic disorders. These findings carry a reassuring message to both patients and their health care providers.
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Protracted postpartum urinary retention (P-PUR) is a rare puerperal complication of overt urinary retention that proceeds beyond the 3rd postpartum day. Long-term consequences of P-PUR are poorly reported. The objective of the study was to compare the long-term outcome of patients with P-PUR with a matched control group, using a validated pelvic floor distress questionnaire. METHODS: All medical files of women diagnosed with P-PUR between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed. The control group was comprised of women who had a consecutive birth, matched in a 1:2 ratio, by maternal age, parity, neonatal birth weight, analgesia, and route of delivery. All women were evaluated for long-term symptoms of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic-organ-prolapse-related complaints by a telephone interview, at least 1 year following their delivery, using the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-Short Form (PFDI-20) questionnaire. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 27 cases of P-PUR out of 52,662 deliveries (0.051%). There were no differences between the study group (n = 27) and controls (n = 54) in age, BMI (kg/m2), parity, birth weight, route of delivery, and rate of episiotomy. The majority of patients in both groups opted for epidural analgesia. Second stage of labor was longer in the study group than in controls, 134.1 ± 74.6 min vs. 73.4 ± 71.6 min, respectively, p < 0.001. The scores of the PFDI-20, UDI-6, and POPDI-6 did not differ between the groups. However, the study group had minimally elevated scores on the CARDI-8 scale (1.0 ± 2.6 vs. 0.0 ± 0.0, p = 0.012). CONCLUSIONS: P-PUR is a rare postpartum complication, yet this disturbing condition has negligible if any clinical impact on long-term urogynecologic disorders. These findings carry a reassuring message to both patients and their health care providers.
Authors: Roderick Teo; Jeanette Punter; Keith Abrams; Christopher Mayne; Douglas Tincello Journal: Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct Date: 2006-08-23
Authors: Pradeep Tyagi; Phillip P Smith; George A Kuchel; William C de Groat; Lori A Birder; Christopher J Chermansky; Rosalyn M Adam; Vincent Tse; Michael B Chancellor; Naoki Yoshimura Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Asnat Groutz; Ishai Levin; Ronen Gold; David Pauzner; Joseph B Lessing; David Gordon Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2010-09-21 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Michael E Carley; Janine M Carley; Gary Vasdev; Timothy G Lesnick; Maurice J Webb; Kirk D Ramin; Raymond A Lee Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Stefan Mohr; Luigi Raio; Ursula Gobrecht-Keller; Sara Imboden; Michael D Mueller; Annette Kuhn Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 1.932