Literature DB >> 30783646

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Breast Implant Surgery: A Pilot Study.

Sze Ng1, Andrea Pusic2, Emily Parker1, Swarna Vishwanath1, Rodney D Cooter3, Elisabeth Elder4, Colin Moore5, John McNeil1, Ingrid Hopper1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Breast-Q Implant Surveillance module (BREAST-Q IS) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) that asks 5 questions on satisfaction (shape, feel, and rippling) and symptoms (pain and tightness) derived from the BREAST-Q.
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to pilot BREAST-Q IS on patients within the Australian Breast Device Registry (ABDR), an opt-out clinical quality device registry, and explored Short Message Service (SMS) communication as a follow-up method.
METHODS: Patients with a breast device surgery in the previous 10 to 15 months, age ≥18 years, with a mobile phone number, were invited to complete the 5-question PROM via SMS initially, followed by 3 phone call attempts if no response, an e-mail, and then a letter by post as a final engagement strategy.
RESULTS: The study included 197 participants [breast augmentation (BA) = 118; breast reconstruction (BR) = 79]. Mean ± SD age was 40 ± 12 years (BA) and 44 ± 11 years (BR). Mean ± SD time since surgery was 414 ± 36 days (BA) and 413 ± 51 days (BR). The total response rate, including opt-outs, was 76%. Responses indicated that >90% of BA and >79% of BR were very or somewhat satisfied with shape, feel, and wrinkling; >70% of BA and >46% of BR reported no pain or tightness. Completion of survey via SMS was 51% (BA) and 55% (BR). Further responses were received by phone (25%, 26%), post (21%, 16%), and e-mail (3%, 3%).
CONCLUSIONS: This pilot demonstrated high levels of satisfaction and low levels of pain and tightness in patients with breast augmentation and breast reconstruction 1 year postoperatively. It also showed the effectiveness of our engagement strategy, which achieved a 76% response rate. Over 50% of respondents used SMS to reply to a 5-question PROM assessing long-term surgical outcomes. This engagement strategy will be used as BREAST-Q IS is rolled out nationally.
© 2019 The American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, Inc. Reprints and permission: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30783646     DOI: 10.1093/asj/sjz023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthet Surg J        ISSN: 1090-820X            Impact factor:   4.283


  5 in total

1.  Association Between Pain and Patient Satisfaction After Rhinoplasty.

Authors:  Shekhar K Gadkaree; David A Shaye; Jessica Occhiogrosso; Linda N Lee
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Establishing the acceptability of a brief patient reported outcome measure and feasibility of implementing it in a breast device registry - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Sze Ng; Maggie Kirkman; Jane Fisher; Andrea Pusic; Emily Parker; Rodney D Cooter; Elisabeth Elder; Colin Moore; John McNeil; Ingrid Hopper
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-22

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of the National Breast Implant Registry for Application in Korea: Can We Predict "Unpredictable" Complications?

Authors:  Woo Jin Song; Sang Gue Kang; Bommie Florence Seo; Nam-Kyong Choi; Jung Ho Lee
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.430

4.  Safety and Performance of POLYTECH Mesmo Breast Implants: A 5-Year Post-market Surveillance Study on 919 Patients.

Authors:  Paolo Montemurro; Giacomo Siri; Luana Clerico
Journal:  Aesthet Surg J Open Forum       Date:  2022-02-07

5.  Fat Grafting and Breast Augmentation: A Systematic Review of Primary Composite Augmentation.

Authors:  Ara A Salibian; Jordan D Frey; Jonathan M Bekisz; Mihye Choi; Nolan S Karp
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2019-07-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.