| Literature DB >> 30783413 |
Hamid Sharif Nia1, Erika Sivarajan-Froelicher2, Ali Akbar Haghdoost3, Mahmood Moosazadeh4, Yiong Huak-Chan5, Ali Asghar Farsavian6, Roghieh Nazari1, Ameneh Yaghoobzadeh7, Amir Hossein Goudarzian8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Research indicates that the age of onset of first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an essential element in the life expectancy that has been decreasing in developing countries. There are various studies performed in Iran reporting a range of ages at time of AMI. Thus, this meta-analysis study is designed to determine the mean age at first AMI in the Iranian population.Entities:
Keywords: Iran; Meta-Analysis; Myocardial Infarction
Year: 2018 PMID: 30783413 PMCID: PMC6368197 DOI: 10.22122/arya.v14i5.1739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ARYA Atheroscler ISSN: 1735-3955
Figure 1Flow chart of the process and rationale used in selecting studies for inclusion
Characteristics of the studies selected for the meta-analysis
| Authors | Geographic regions | Sample size | Sampling methods | AMI age (year) (mean ± SD) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Men | Women | ||||
| Ahmadi et al.[ | Tehran | 20750 | Census | 61.20 ± 13.40 | 59.60 ± 11.80 | 65.40 ± 12.60 |
| Farshidi et al.[ | Bandar Abbas | 227 | Census | 57.93 ± 13.10 | Unknown | Unknown |
| Gholi et al.[ | Karaj | 140 | Convenient | 58.80 ± 11.50 | Unknown | Unknown |
| Hadjian and Jalali[ | Babol | 1233 | Census | 60.60 ± 11.20 | 60.10 ± 11.80 | 61.50 ± 11.00 |
| Hasan pour et al.[ | Shahr-e Kord | 150 | Convenient | 57.70 ± 10.50 | Unknown | Unknown |
| Hojat[ | Jahrom | 150 | Convenient | 55.92 ± 11.00 | Unknown | Unknown |
| Sezavar et al.[ | Tehran | 1829 | Census | 60.63 ± 13.50 | 56.90 ± 12.90 | 66.10 ± 11.60 |
| Kazemy and Sharifzadeh[ | Birjand | 918 | Census | 60.70 ± 12.10 | 58.90 ± 12.20 | 65.30 ± 10.70 |
| Kiani et al.[ | Zahedan | 213 | Convenient | 58.30 ± 12.60 | Unknown | Unknown |
| Taghipour et al.[ | Amol | 366 | Convenient | 58.70 ± 12.20 | 57.44 ± 13.30 | 65.40 ± 12.60 |
| Mohammadian et al.[ | Isfahan | 12815 | Census | 61.85 ± 12.60 | 60.00 ± 12.50 | 66.72 ± 11.30 |
| Beyranvand et al.[ | Tehran | 300 | Convenient | 56.60 ± 9.50 | 55.50 ± 9.50 | 58.20 ± 9.40 |
| Momeni et al.[ | Rasht | 162 | Convenient | 60.29 ± 12.40 | 59.71 ± 12.90 | 60.87 ± 11.90 |
| Sharif Nia et al.[ | Amol | 169 | Convenient | 59.49 ± 11.68 | 57.34 ± 13.60 | 61.64 ± 9.50 |
| Rajaei Behbahani et al.[ | Tehran | 33831 | Census | 62.91 ± 0.50 | 59.70 ± 0.80 | 66.13 ± 0.10 |
| Rostamzadeh et al.[ | Urmia | 81 | Census | 60.00 ± 7.80 | 57.40 ± 13.50 | 67.10 ± 9.00 |
AMI: Acute myocardial infarction; SD: Standard deviation
Figure 2The mean age of total patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in each of the first studies entered into meta-analysis and its overall estimate ES: Effect size; CI: Confidence interval
Figure 3The mean age of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in men in each of the first studies entered into meta-analysis and its overall estimate ES: Effect size; CI: Confidence interval
Figure 4The mean age of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in women in each of the first studies entered into meta-analysis and its overall estimate ES: Effect size; CI: Confidence interval