| Literature DB >> 30783372 |
Yi-Fan Miao1, Hong-Xin Kang1, Juan Li1, Yu-Mei Zhang1, Hong-Yu Ren1, Lv Zhu1, Huan Chen1, Ling Yuan1, Hang Su1, Mei-Hua Wan1, Wen-Fu Tang2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Obesity worsens inflammatory organ injury in acute pancreatitis (AP), but there is no effective preventive strategy. Sheng-jiang powder (SJP) has been shown to alleviate multiple-organ inflammatory injury in rats with high-fat diet-induced obesity. Hence, SJP is supposed to have an effect on multiple-organ inflammatory injury in AP in rats fed a high-fat diet. AIM: To explore how obesity may contribute to aggravating inflammatory organ injury in AP in rats and observe the effect of SJP on multiple-organ inflammatory injury in AP in rats fed a high-fat diet.Entities:
Keywords: Acute pancreatitis; Multiple-organ inflammatory injury; Obesity; Oxidative stress; Sheng-jiang powder
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30783372 PMCID: PMC6378539 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i6.683
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Gastroenterol ISSN: 1007-9327 Impact factor: 5.742
Feeding schedules used in the present study
| CG | 8 | Control diet | Equal volumes of normal saline. |
| OG | 8 | High-fat diet | Equal volumes of normal saline. |
| SG | 8 | High-fat diet | Sheng-jiang powder (5 g/kg of body weight) |
CG: Control group; OG: Obese group; SG: Sheng-jiang powder treatment group.
Compositions of the experimental diet
| Casein | 200 | 753.20 | 267 | 1335 |
| Corn starch | 397 | 1495.10 | 0 | 0 |
| Maltodextrin | 132 | 497.11 | 157 | 785 |
| Sucrose | 100 | 376.60 | 89 | 445 |
| Soybean oil | 70 | 263.62 | 33 | 165 |
| Lard | 0 | 0.00 | 301 | 1505 |
| Cellulose | 50 | 188.30 | 67 | 335 |
| Mineral mixture | 35 | 131.81 | 66 | 330 |
| Vitamin mixture | 10 | 37.66 | 13 | 65 |
| L-cystine | 3 | 11.30 | 4 | 20 |
| Choline bitartrate | 0 | 0.00 | 3 | 15 |
| Choline chloride | 3 | 11.30 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 1000 | 3766 | 1000 | 5000 |
Body weight, Lee's index, and serum biochemistry parameter levels of rats
| Body weight (g) | 480.10 ± 43.62 | 608.10 ± 36.96 | 536.60 ± 46.77 |
| Lee’s index | 301.40 ± 23.36 | 332.90 ± 19.52 | 307.30 ± 19.40 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.35 ± 0.51 | 2.69 ± 0.86 | 1.60 ± 0.60 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 1.46 ± 0.32 | 1.97 ± 0.21 | 1.68 ± 0.19 |
| HDL-c (mmol/L) | 0.68 ± 0.11 | 0.46 ± 0.07 | 0.59 ± 0.12 |
| LDL-c (mmol/L) | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.49 ± 0.11 | 0.48 ± 0.11 |
The results are presented as the mean ± SD.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01 vs the control group.
cP < 0.05.
P < 0.01 vs the obese group.
CG: Control group; OG: Obese group; SG: Sheng-jiang powder treatment group; TG: Triglyceride; TC: Total cholesterol; HDL-c: High-density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-c: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Figure 1Serum amylase levels in rats. The results are presented as the mean ± SD. eP < 0.01 vs the control group before acute pancreatitis induction. CG’: Control group before acute pancreatitis induction; CG: Control group; OG: Obese group; SG: Sheng-jiang powder treatment group.
Figure 2Serum inflammatory cytokine levels in rats. The results are presented as the mean ± SD. bP < 0.01 vs the control group, dP < 0.01 vs the obese group. CG: Control group; OG: Obese group; SG: Sheng-jiang powder treatment group; IL: Interleukin.
Oxidative stress conditions of multiple organs
| Pancreas | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1048 ± 116 | 1584 ± 278 | 1066 ± 156 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 338 ± 31 | 244±21 | 285 ± 18 |
| Heart | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1358 ± 199 | 1685 ± 87 | 1297 ± 83 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 313 ± 24 | 321 ± 42 | 351 ± 14 |
| Spleen | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1247 ± 205 | 1748 ± 96 | 1569 ± 185 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 288 ± 17 | 214 ± 15 | 322 ± 44 |
| Lung | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1359 ± 283 | 1745 ± 86 | 1282 ± 140d |
| SOD (U/mL) | 153 ± 31 | 268 ± 21 | 241 ± 23 |
| MPO (ng/mL) | 77 ± 5 | 79 ± 12 | 56 ± 6 |
| Intestine | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1266 ± 141 | 1412 ± 325 | 1414 ± 235 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 347 ± 12 | 240 ± 19 | 341 ± 29 |
| MPO (ng/mL) | 46 ± 3 | 75 ± 9 | 64 ± 3 |
| Liver | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1285 ± 146 | 1549 ± 92 | 1235 ± 160 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 308 ± 47 | 229 ± 11 | 231 ± 12 |
| ROS (IU/mL) | 718 ± 146 | 819 ± 96 | 730 ± 85 |
| GSH-Px (mIU/mL) | 86 ± 11 | 71 ± 20 | 80 ± 6 |
| Kidney | |||
| MDA (pmol/mL) | 1077 ± 236 | 1519 ± 217 | 1513 ± 223 |
| SOD (U/mL) | 240 ± 22 | 350 ± 22 | 316 ± 55 |
| ROS (IU/mL) | 598 ± 85 | 677 ± 142 | 666 ± 49 |
| GSH-Px (mIU/mL) | 53 ± 7 | 66 ± 17 | 82 ± 13 |
The results are presented as the mean ± SD.
P < 0.05.
P < 0.01 vs the control group; cP < 0.05.
P < 0.01 vs the obese group.
CG: Control group; OG: Obese group; SG: Sheng-jiang powder treatment group; MDA: Malondialdehyde; SOD: Superoxide dismutase; MPO: Myeloperoxidase; ROS: Reactive oxygen species; GSH-Px: Glutathione peroxidase.
Figure 3Histological scores and pathological images of multiple organs in rats. A: Histological scores of the pancreas, heart, spleen, lung, intestine, liver, and kidney. B: Pathological images of the pancreas, heart, spleen, lung, intestine, liver, and kidney (× 200). The results are presented as the mean ± SD. bP < 0.01 vs the control group, cP < 0.05 vs the obese group. CG: Control group; OG: Obese group; SG: Sheng-jiang powder treatment group.