Literature DB >> 30782192

Impact of acute renal failure on plasmatic levels of cleaved endocan.

Alexandre Gaudet1,2,3,4, Erika Parmentier5,6,7,8, Nathalie De Freitas Caires5,6,7,9, Lucie Portier5,6,7,9, Sylvain Dubucquoi10, Julien Poissy8, Thibault Duburcq8, Maxence Hureau5,6,7,8, Philippe Lassalle5,6,7,11, Daniel Mathieu5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30782192      PMCID: PMC6381621          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-019-2349-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Recent failures to improve the prognostic of sepsis have underlined the need for a better phenotypical description of septic subjects. In this view, endocan, an endothelial proteoglycan secreted under proinflammatory conditions, has been described as a useful biomarker to early identify patients at higher risk of poor outcomes during the time course of sepsis [1]. More recently, a major catabolite of endocan, p14, has been observed at high plasmatic levels in a series of septic subjects, paving the way for a more accurate prediction of poor outcomes in such patients. However, major variations of p14 were observed between patients in this series, with unknown clinical significance [2]. Furthermore, it is currently unknown whether p14 could undergo renal elimination. We performed a post hoc analysis based on the data from a previously published prospective cohort of severe septic patients [3]. Ninety-nine patients underwent measurement of p14 on EDTA plasma. Plasmatic endocan cleavage ratio (ECR) was calculated as plasma p14/(endocan + p14) ratio (endocan and p14 being expressed in pmol/mL) on baseline and 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h following ICU admission. Baseline characteristics of patients are exposed in Additional file 1. In this cohort, ECR on enrolment was correlated with baseline SAPS 2 (ρ = 0.36, 95% CI (0.17–0.53); p <  10− 3) and SOFA (ρ = 0.21 (0–0.39); p = 0.04). Renal SOFA was the only component of SOFA score associated with higher ECR, with median [IQR] baseline ECR observed at 0.38 [0.29–0.61] in patients with baseline renal SOFA > 2 vs 0.28 [0.19–0.36] in patients with baseline renal SOFA ≤ 2 (p <  10− 3) (Table 1). Over 72 h, patients with a baseline renal SOFA at 4 had higher median plasmatic ECR than those with baseline renal SOFA < 4 (p <  10− 3) (Fig. 1).
Table 1

Endocan cleavage ratio (ECR) according to patients’ characteristics

VariablesAbsentPresentSpearman ρ (95% CI) p
Age (years)0.18 (− 0.03–0.37)0.08
Chronic comorbidities
 COPD0.33 [0.21–0.42]0.23 [0.18–0.51]0.53
 Smoker0.33 [0.21–0.45]0.23 [0.18–0.35]0.15
 Cardiomyopathy0.3 [0.2–0.42]0.33 [0.2–0.45]0.61
 Chronic kidney failure0.31 [0.21–0.44]0.25 [0.05–0.56]0.7
 Cirrhosis0.31 [0.2–0.45]0.3 [0.21–0.37]0.63
Sepsis severity on enrolment
 Severe sepsis0.29 [0.2–0.41]
 Septic shock0.31 [0.2–0.45]0.74
Site of infection on enrolment
 Soft tissues0.3 [0.2–0.39]
 Respiratory0.33 [0.21–0.45]
 Urinary0.31 [0.22–0.53]0.82
 Digestive0.31 [0.24–0.38]
 Other0.21 [0.07–0.49]
Biomarkers on enrolment
 CRP (mg/L)0 (−0.21–0.2)0.96
 PCT (ng/mL)0.06 (− 0.15–0.26)0.58
Prognostic scores on enrolment
 SAPS 20.36 (0.17–0.53)< 10−3
 SOFA0.21 (0–0.39)0.04
 LIPS0.12 (−0.08–0.32)0.22
Organ SOFA > 2 on enrolment
 Pulmonary0.3 [0.2–0.37]0.35 [0.24–0.48]0.19
 Renal0.28 [0.19–0.36]0.38 [0.29–0.61]< 10− 3
 Hepatic0.32 [0.21–0.42]0.26 [0.14–0.53]0.75
 Circulatory0.23 [0–0.39]0.33 [0.23–0.45]0.12
 Neurological0.3 [0.2–0.38]0.33 [0.24–0.48]0.19
 Hematological0.31 [0.2–0.4]0.27 [0.12–0.54]0.99
Mortality
 Day 280.3 [0.19–0.38]0.33 [0.23–0.48]0.4
 ICU discharge0.3 [0.2–0.37]0.33 [0.23–0.54]0.24
ICU length of stay (days)0.16 (−0.04–0.35)0.11
Mechanical ventilation on enrolment0.3 [0.19–0.37]0.31 [0.23–0.47]0.33

ECR are presented as median [IQR] values according to presence or absence of categorical variables. A Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison between two groups. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between three or more groups. Correlations between ECR and continuous variables are described through Spearman ρ (95% CI)

COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS 2 Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2, LIPS Lung Injury Prediction Score

Fig. 1

a Box plots of plasmatic endocan cleavage ratio (ECR) on enrolment according to baseline renal SOFA. Box plot shows the median (horizontal line) and IQR (25th–75th percentile) (box). The whiskers show the lowest data within 1.5 IQR of the lower quartile and highest data within 1.5 IQR of the upper quartile; data outside 1.5 IQR of the upper or lower quartiles are depicted with a dot. Comparison between subjects with renal SOFA > 2 vs renal SOFA ≤ 2 was performed with the Mann-Whitney test. *: p <  10− 3. b Kinetics of plasmatic ECR median values over 72 h following enrolment according to baseline renal SOFA

Endocan cleavage ratio (ECR) according to patients’ characteristics ECR are presented as median [IQR] values according to presence or absence of categorical variables. A Mann-Whitney test was used for comparison between two groups. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparison between three or more groups. Correlations between ECR and continuous variables are described through Spearman ρ (95% CI) COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ICU intensive care unit, SAPS 2 Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2, LIPS Lung Injury Prediction Score a Box plots of plasmatic endocan cleavage ratio (ECR) on enrolment according to baseline renal SOFA. Box plot shows the median (horizontal line) and IQR (25th–75th percentile) (box). The whiskers show the lowest data within 1.5 IQR of the lower quartile and highest data within 1.5 IQR of the upper quartile; data outside 1.5 IQR of the upper or lower quartiles are depicted with a dot. Comparison between subjects with renal SOFA > 2 vs renal SOFA ≤ 2 was performed with the Mann-Whitney test. *: p <  10− 3. b Kinetics of plasmatic ECR median values over 72 h following enrolment according to baseline renal SOFA Our results suggest that circulating concentrations of p14 might be influenced by the severity of acute renal failure. Therefore, it could be proposed that, by contrast with endocan, p14 could be eliminated through glomerular filtration, thus suggesting that it should be measured in urine rather that in blood. This discrepancy might be explained by the smaller molecular weight of p14, as well as the absence of polyanionic glycanic chain on its protein core. Further explorations are needed to confirm these hypotheses. Cohort baseline characteristics. Continuous and categorical variables are described as median [interquartile range] and number (percentage), respectively. COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, SOFA Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, ICU Intensive Care Unit SAPS 2 Simplified Acute Physiology Score 2, LIPS Lung Injury Prediction Score (DOC 45 kb)
  3 in total

1.  Endocan is a reliable biomarker during continuous renal replacement therapy.

Authors:  Maxence Hureau; Alexandre Gaudet; Nathalie De Freitas Caires; Erika Parmentier; Julien Poissy; Thibault Duburcq; Philippe Lassalle; Daniel Mathieu
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 2.  The Role of Endocan in Selected Kidney Diseases.

Authors:  Magdalena Nalewajska; Klaudia Gurazda; Małgorzata Marchelek-Myśliwiec; Andrzej Pawlik; Violetta Dziedziejko
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of Endocan in Kidney Diseases.

Authors:  Elisabeth Samouilidou; Virginia Athanasiadou; Eirini Grapsa
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.