| Literature DB >> 30782166 |
Patience E Idoga1, Mehmet Toycan2, Halil Nadiri3, Erbuğ Çelebi4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cloud based health platforms (CBHP) have tremendous capacity to meet patient's health needs. The benefits inherent in CBHP position it to be relevant for efficient healthcare delivery. Nonetheless, studies have shown that the adoption of new technologies is sometimes a challenge especially in developing nations. This study, therefore, aim to examine, identify and evaluate the factors affecting healthcare professionals' intention to accept the cloud-based health center (CBHC) in developing countries. The research study focuses on hospitals in North-central of Nigeria.Entities:
Keywords: Cloud computing; Healthcare professionals; Nigeria; Technology acceptance; UTAUT2
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30782166 PMCID: PMC6381757 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0751-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak ISSN: 1472-6947 Impact factor: 2.796
Summary of cloud computing acceptance
| Author/year | Title | Subject | Model | Findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hsieh P.J (2016) [ | An empirical investigation of patients’ acceptance and resistance toward the health cloud: The dual factor perspective | Patients | UTAUT | Findings show that patients acceptance or otherwise of a health cloud shows a negative effect. |
| Hsieh P.J. (2015) [ | Healthcare professionals’ use of health clouds: Integrating technology acceptance and status quo bias perspectives | Health workers | Findings show a negative trend in the relationship that exist between health workers intention or otherwise to the usage of the health cloud. | |
| Su Chen-Ying et al. (2015) [ | Willingness of E-care Cloud System Using-Based on a Long-term Caring Institution in Southern Taiwan | Caregivers | TAM2 | Findings show that caregivers are willing to use the E-care cloud system. In addition, information literacy and working association were seen as being able to enhance caregivers’ willingness to use the system. |
| Chen M.S. et al. (2016) [ | The Intention to Use the Cloud Sphygmomanometer-Demonstrated by Taiwan Medical Center | Patients | TAM | Investigations identified specific important factors such as social influence, anchor and adjustment as major influence for using cloud sphygmomanometer and how this factors relates with TAM. |
| Sedem et al. (2015) [ | Cloud Computing Framework for E-Health in Ghana: Adoption Issues and Strategies: Case Study Of Ghana Health Service | Healthcare professionals | Diffusion of Innovation Theory (DOI) | Findings indicate that most healthcare professionals in Ghana, are well informed with modern health technologies. |
Fig. 1UTAUT2 theoretical framework (Source: authors)
Fig. 2CBHC system architecture (source: Figure created using the demo version of ConceptDraw Diagram software which adheres to the terms and conditions of ConceptDraw)
Fig. 3Hypothesized Research Model
Demographic data of respondent (n = 300)
| Variable | Category | Frequency (n) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 135 | 45.0 |
| Female | 165 | 55.0 | |
| Occupation of respondents | Doctors | 60 | 20.0 |
| Nurses | 65 | 21.7 | |
| Others | 175 | 58.3 | |
| Years of experience | 1–6 | 205 | 68.3 |
| 7–12 | 40 | 13.3 | |
| 13–18 | 19 | 6.3 | |
| 19–31 above | 36 | 12.0 |
Measures of key constructs used
| Constructs | Items | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Performance expectancy | PE1- The use of the Cloud based Health Center will enhance a better work efficiency for the professionals. | [ |
| PE2- The use of Cloud Health Center will save the time of both patients and healthcare professionals. | ||
| PE3- The use of Cloud Based Health Center allows professionals to monitor a patient from a remote location. | ||
| PE4- Cloud Based Health Center will increase my productivity. | ||
| Cloud based health knowledge | CBHK1- I am aware of worldwide e-health service implementations for health institutions. | [ |
| CBHK2- I have information of Cloud Based Health Center technologies. | ||
| CBHK3- I am familiar with the technical infrastructure /mobile applications which has to be used. | ||
| CBHK4- I have made myself familiar with model processes of Cloud Based Health Center, which are relevant to my practice. | ||
| CBHK5 - I am aware of the changes that comes with cloud based health technologies and how it will affect my daily work life. | ||
| Social influence | SI1 - Your friends, family and colleagues think that Cloud Based Health Center is a useful thing. | [ |
| SI2 - Your friends, family and colleagues thinks that Cloud Based Health Center would improve quality of service. | ||
| SI3 - Your friends, family and colleague would also use Cloud Based Health Center. | ||
| SI4 - Do you often discuss the advantages of E-health technologies with friends/family/colleagues? | ||
| SI5 - My friends, family and colleagues could assist me in the use of Cloud Based Health Center (when available). | ||
| Self-efficacy | SE1 - I feel confident in finding information on a Cloud Based Health center platform. | [ |
| SE2 - I have the necessary skills for using a Cloud Based Health Center application successfully. | ||
| SE3 - There are available IT experts to train the staff on Cloud Based Health Center. | ||
| SE4 - I feel confident to work through all interventions that the platform provides me | ||
| Data security | DS1 - I feel apprehensive about using a Cloud Based Health Center in terms of privacy issues. | [ |
| DS2 - There are available, security measures to protect both internal and external communication from unauthorized users. | ||
| DS3 - There are security measures to communicate accurate information among health institutions. | ||
| DS4 - There are security measures to communicate accurate information within health institutions. | ||
| IT infrastructure | II1 - Appropriate IT infrastructure are available for Cloud Based Health Center implementations. | [ |
| II2 - Management of healthcare organization creates a favorable environment to support and encourage the usage of information system. | ||
| II3 - The budget for the planning and funding of infrastructural investment in health institutions is adequate. | ||
| II4 - There is a service maintenance in place to maintain health institutions’ existing infrastructure. | ||
| II5 - The existing infrastructure is adequate to support the use of Cloud Based Health Center | ||
| Information sharing | IS1 - It is acceptable if my personal health information is uploaded on the Cloud Based Health Center. | [ |
| IS2 - I am not bothered if my information is shared with other health institution connected to the platform. | ||
| IS3 - Overemphasis on patient’s privacy protection hinders the necessary flow of information sharing amongst health institutions. | ||
| IS4 - Information sharing among the units and departments is effective | ||
| Behavioral intention | BI1- I am excited at learning cloud based health system | [ |
| BI2 – I am willing to use cloud health system |
Characteristics of surveyed health institutions
| Name of health institution | Number of respondents | Gender | Profession of respondents | Hospital specialty | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Doctors | Nurses | Others | |||
| Hospital A | 100 | 41 | 59 | 20 | 20 | 60 | Teaching hospital |
| Hospital B | 100 | 41 | 59 | 28 | 18 | 54 | Federal |
| Hospital C | 20 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 13 | Private |
| Hospital D | 30 | 16 | 14 | 5 | 7 | 18 | General |
| Hospital E | 15 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 | Private |
| Hospital F | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 6 | Private |
| Hospital G | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | Private |
| Hospital H | 5 | 2 | 3 | – | 3 | 2 | Primary Healthcare |
| Hospital I | 15 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 10 | Private |
| Total | 300 | 135 | 165 | 60 | 65 | 175 | |
Alphabets A to I represent health institutions visited
Fig. 4Level of cloud based health knowledge of respondents
Composite reliability of dependent and independent variables
| Construct | Item | Factor loading | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Expectancy | PE1 | 0.824 | 0.841 | 0.6198 |
| PE2 | 0.877 | |||
| PE3 | 0.650 | |||
| PE4 | 0.780 | |||
| Cloud Based Health Knowledge | CBHK1 | 0.769 | 0.893 | 0.628 |
| CBHK2 | 0.818 | |||
| CBHK3 | 0.848 | |||
| CBHK4 | 0.836 | |||
| CBHK5 | 0.681 | |||
| Self -Efficacy | SE1 | 0.860 | 0.810 | 0.5267 |
| SE2 | 0.814 | |||
| SE3 | 0.481 | |||
| SE4 | 0.688 | |||
| Data Security | DS1 | 0.673 | 0.826 | 0.545 |
| DS2 | 0.804 | |||
| DS3 | 0.784 | |||
| DS4 | 0.683 | |||
| IT Infrastructure | IT1 | 0.861 | 0.9265 | 0.7163 |
| IT2 | 0.777 | |||
| IT3 | 0.873 | |||
| IT4 | 0.893 | |||
| IT5 | 0.823 | |||
| Social Influence | SI1 | 0.750 | 0.786 | (0.4296) |
| SI2 | 0.707 | |||
| SI3 | 0.670 | |||
| SI4 | 0.459 | |||
| SI5 | 0.653 | |||
| Information Sharing | IS1 | 0.739 | 0.797 | 0.5035 |
| IS2 | 0.841 | |||
| IS3 | 0.716 | |||
| IS4 | 0.498 | |||
| Behavioral Intention towards CBHS | BI1 | 0.823 | 0.821 | 0.697 |
| BI2 | 0.847 |
CR Composite reliability and the AVE Average variance extracted values in bracket are not used in the analysis
Discriminant characteristics of constructs
| Construct | PE | CBHK | SE | DS | IT | SI | IS | BI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PE |
| |||||||
| CBHK | 0.224 |
| ||||||
| SE | 0.280 | 0.484 |
| |||||
| DS | 0.240 | 0.494 | 0.453 |
| ||||
| IT | 0.019 | 0.343 | 0.397 | 0.355 |
| |||
| SI | 0.248 | 0.453 | 0.572 | 0.452 | 0.462 |
| ||
| IS | 0.082 | 0.259 | 0.260 | 0.215 | 0.170 | 0.436 |
| |
| BI | 0.005 | 0.058 | 0.014 | 0.037 | 0.027 | 0.036 | 0.044 |
|
Note: Square root of AVE in the diagonal (Bold)
Results of ICC evaluation showing Single-Rating and Absolute-Agreement using 2-Way-Mixed effects Model
| Intraclass Correlation | 95% Confidence Interval | F Test with Value 0 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | Value |
|
| Sig | ||
| Single Measures | .195 | .152 | .243 | 3.261 | 299 | 2093 | .001 |
| Average Measures | .659 | .589 | .719 | 3.261 | 299 | 2093 | .001 |
Fig. 5Structural Model
Summarized results for hypothesis examination
| Hypothesis | Path coefficient (β) | T – value | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| PE | 0.68 | 8.08 | Accepted |
| PE | 0.23 | 2.25 | Accepted |
| CBHK | 0.27 | 5.53 | Accepted |
| SE | 0.07 | 1.52 | Rejected |
| DS | 0.00 | 0.07 | Rejected |
| IT | 0.11 | 2.72 | Accepted |
| SI | 0.11 | 2.10 | Accepted |
| IS | 0.02 | 0.46 | Rejected |