| Literature DB >> 30781833 |
Kai Song1, Yejing Wang2, Yu Li3, Chaoxiang Ding4, Rui Cai5, Gang Tao6, Ping Zhao7, Qingyou Xia8, Huawei He9,10.
Abstract
Enzymatic activity assays are essential and critical for the study of enzyme kinetics. Adenylate kinase (Adk) plays a fundamental role in cellular energy and nucleotide homeostasis. To date, assays based on different principles have been used for the determination of Adk activity. Here, we show a spectrophotometric analysis technique to determine Adk activity with bromothymol blue as a pH indicator. We analyzed the effects of substrates and the pH indicator on the assay using orthogonal design and then established the most optimal assay for Adk activity. Subsequently, we evaluated the thermostability of Adk and the inhibitory effect of KCl on Adk activity with this assay. Our results show that this assay is simple, rapid, and precise. It shows great potential as an alternative to the conventional Adk activity assay. Our results also suggest that orthogonal design is an effective approach, which is very suitable for the optimization of complex enzyme reaction conditions.Entities:
Keywords: adenylate kinase; bromothymol blue; enzymatic activity assay; orthogonal experiment; spectrophotometry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30781833 PMCID: PMC6412689 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24040663
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1The principle of the spectrophotometric assay for adenylate kinase (Adk) activity.
Factors and levels affecting Adk activity assay.
| Level | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP (mM) | AMP (mM) | Bromothymol Blue (mM) | Glycine–NaOH (mM) | |
| 1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0930 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.1084 | 0.3 |
| 3 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.1238 | 0.5 |
Orthogonal array (9, 34) for the analysis of the effects of ATP, AMP, bromothymol blue, and glycine–NaOH buffer on the Adk activity assay.
| No. | Combination | Factor | ΔAbs a (0–30 s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |||
| 1 | A1B1C1D1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0930 | 0.1 | 0.0914 ± 0.0020 |
| 2 | A1B2C2D2 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 0.1084 | 0.3 | 0.0432 ± 0.0045 |
| 3 | A1B3C3D3 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 0.1238 | 0.5 | 0.0112 ± 0.0017 |
| 4 | A2B1C2D3 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 0.1084 | 0.5 | 0.0404 ± 0.0017 |
| 5 | A2B2C3D1 | 2.5 | 1.5 | 0.1238 | 0.1 | 0.0221 ± 0.0020 |
| 6 | A2B3C1D2 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 0.0930 | 0.3 | 0.0606 ± 0.0022 |
| 7 | A3B1C3D2 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 0.1238 | 0.3 | 0.0341 ± 0.0009 |
| 8 | A3B2C1D3 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 0.0930 | 0.5 | 0.0705 ± 0.0049 |
| 9 | A3B3C2D1 | 3.0 | 2.0 | 0.1084 | 0.1 | 0.0382 ± 0.0017 |
| T1 | 0.1458 | 0.1659 | 0.2225 | 0.1517 | ||
| T2 | 0.1231 | 0.1358 | 0.1218 | 0.1379 | ||
| T3 | 0.1428 | 0.1100 | 0.0674 | 0.1221 | ||
| t1 | 0.0486 | 0.0553 | 0.0742 | 0.0506 | ||
| t2 | 0.0410 | 0.0453 | 0.0406 | 0.0460 | ||
| t3 | 0.0476 | 0.0367 | 0.0225 | 0.0407 | ||
| Range (R) | 0.0076 | 0.0186 | 0.0517 | 0.0099 | ||
| Order | C ˃ B ˃ D ˃ A | |||||
| Optimal level | A1 | B1 | C1 | D1 | ||
| Optimal combination | A1B1C1D1 | |||||
a Arithmetic mean of the absorbance changes of bromothymol blue at 614 nm (0–30 s) of three independent tests at each level under the same factor. Ti (T1, T2, T3) is the sum of the recorded absorbance changes (ΔAbs) at the same level and under the same factor, and ti (t1, t2, t3) is the arithmetic mean of Ti. The mean of ti represents the influence of different levels under the same factor on the absorbance of bromothymol blue. Range (R) is the difference between the maximum and the minimum of ti, indicating the effect of each factor on the absorbance of bromothymol blue. The greater the R value, the greater is the influence of this factor on the absorbance of bromothymol blue at 614 nm.
Figure 2The maximum absorption wavelength of the reaction mixture and its relationship with the hydrogen ion concentration. (a) The absorption spectra of nine different combinations in the presence of 5 mM MgAC2; (b) effect of hydrogen ion concentration on the absorption of the reaction system; (c) the correlation of the absorbance change of bromothymol blue at 614 nm with hydrogen ion concentration.
Factors and levels affecting Adk activity assay with the constants of A and D.
| Level | A | B | C | D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATP (mM) | AMP (mM) | Bomothymol Blue (mM) | Glycine–NaOH (mM) | |
| 1 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0930 | 0.1 |
| 2 | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0775 | 0.1 |
| 3 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.0620 | 0.1 |
A full factorial design for the analysis of the effects of AMP, bromothymol blue on the Adk activity assay with the constants of A and D.
| Run | Combination | Factor | ΔAbs b (0–30 s) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | |||
| 1 | AB1C1D | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0930 | 0.1 | 0.0914 ± 0.0020 |
| 2 | AB1C2D | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0775 | 0.1 | 0.0926 ± 0.0030 |
| 3 | AB1C3D | 2.0 | 1.0 | 0.0620 | 0.1 | 0.0764 ± 0.0030 |
| 4 | AB2C1D | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0930 | 0.1 | 0.0914 ± 0.0020 |
| 5 | AB2C2D | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0775 | 0.1 | 0.0930 ± 0.0018 |
| 6 | AB2C3D | 2.0 | 0.8 | 0.0620 | 0.1 | 0.0680 ± 0.0041 |
| 7 | AB3C1D | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.0930 | 0.1 | 0.0983 ± 0.0028 |
| 8 | AB3C2D | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.0775 | 0.1 | 0.0850 ± 0.0054 |
| 9 | AB3C3D | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.0620 | 0.1 | 0.0604 ± 0.0001 |
b Arithmetic mean of the absorbance changes of bromothymol blue at 614 nm (0–30 s) of three independent tests at each level under the same factor.
Figure 3The effect of Adk contents on the assay. (a) Effect of different Adk contents on the assay; (b) the correlation of the absorbance change of bromothymol blue at 614 nm with different Adk contents.
Figure 4The thermostability of Adk and the inhibition of KCl on Adk activity. (a) Effect of temperature on Adk activity; (b) effect of KCl concentration on Adk activity.
Correspondence between pH and the absorbance of bromothymol blue at 614 nm.
| pH | 6.47 | 6.54 | 6.73 | 6.79 | 6.85 | 7.07 | 7.21 | 7.28 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abs | 0.8145 | 0.9197 | 0.9438 | 1.0375 | 1.0847 | 1.2385 | 1.3850 | 1.4188 |