| Literature DB >> 30781773 |
Anna Popczyk1,2, Aouatif Aamoum3,4, Anna Migalska-Zalas5, Przemyslaw Płóciennik6, Anna Zawadzka7, Jaroslaw Mysliwiec8, Bouchta Sahraoui9.
Abstract
In this paper, we present the third harmonic generation response of Znq₂ (Bis-(8-hydroxyquinolinato)zinc), Cuq₂ (8-Hydroxyquinoline copper(II)), and Alq₃ (Tris-(8-hydroxyquinoline)aluminum) organometallic compounds. An experiment was conducted for s and p polarizations of incident beam, using the Maker fringes technique. The third order nonlinear susceptibility χ(3) was estimated using the Kubodera and Kobayashi comparative model, on the grounds that presented compounds exhibit high linear absorption of the generated third harmonic wavelength (355 nm). These complexes were deposited as thin films using the physical vapor deposition (PVD) method. Investigated complexes vary in terms of the coordination center and number of quinoline ligands, which visibly influence their nonlinear response. The global hybrid B3LYP functional with the basis set 6-31G(d) was used in computing the linear and non-linear optical properties. The computed γtot value (8765.36 × 10-36 esu for Cuq₂) is superior to that of methylene blue (γ = 32.00 × 10-36 esu). The calculated theoretical values were found to be in good agreement with the experimental results.Entities:
Keywords: DFT/B3LYP/6-31G(d) calculations; coordination complexes; nonlinear optic (NLO); organometallic compounds; physical vapor deposition (PVD); third harmonic generation (THG)
Year: 2019 PMID: 30781773 PMCID: PMC6409707 DOI: 10.3390/nano9020254
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1Chemical structures of investigated molecules: (a) 8-Hydroxyquinoline zinc [Znq2], (b) 8-Hydroxyquinoline copper II [Cuq2], (c) Tris(8-Hydroxyquinoline) aluminium [Alq3].
Figure 2Topography Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) images of investigated metalorganic complexes thin films: Znq2 (a) 2D and (b) 3D, Cuq2 (c) 2D and (d) 3D, and Alq3 (e) 2D and (f) 3D.
Figure 3AFM profiles of investigated metalorganic complexes thin films.
Figure 4UV-Vis absorption spectra of studied molecules (Znq2, Cuq2, and Alq3).
Figure 5Third harmonic intensity of Znq2 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Figure 6Third harmonic intensity of Cuq2 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
Figure 7Third harmonic intensity of Alq3 film and silica as a function of the incident angle for polarization s and p.
The values of the third order nonlinear optical susceptibility of thin films obtained from the third harmonic generation (THG) technique for polarization s and p.
| Polarisation S | Polarisation P | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d | α | χ(3) | χ(3) | χ(3) | χ(3) | χ(3)/α | |
|
| 173 | 4.19 | 1.62 | 1.16 | 1.76 | 1.27 | 3.03 |
|
| 166 | 3.65 | 1.85 | 1.32 | 1.78 | 1.27 | 3.62 |
|
| 223 | 3.81 | 1.32 | 0.96 | 1.33 | 0.96 | 2.51 |
|
| - | - | 0.02 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.16 | |
d—thickness, α—absorption coefficient, χ(3)—third order susceptibility.
Figure 8Optimized structures of investigated molecules: (a) Znq2, (b) Cuq2, (c) Alq3.
Figure 9Theoretically simulated UV-Vis spectra of Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2.
HOMO and LUMO energy levels and theoretical bandgap (Eg)HOMO–LUMO (B3LYP/6-31G(d)).
| Sample | HOMO [eV] | LUMO [eV] | (Eg)HOMO–LUMO [eV] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alq3 | −5.25 | −2.19 | 3.06 |
| Znq2 | −5.42 | −2.06 | 3.36 |
| Cuq2 | −5.13 | −2.16 | 2.97 |
Some selected components of the frequency-dependent γ (−2ω; ω, ω, 0) values at ω = 0.042827 a.u. = 1064 nm.
| Sample | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 626 | 623 | 14 | 211 | 28 | 28 | 359 |
|
| 213 | 13 | 6 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 57 |
|
| 1751 | 406 | 25653 | 222 | 6369 | 1417 | 8765 |
The frontier molecular orbitals: HOMO and LUMO for Alq3, Znq2, and Cuq2.
| Sample | HOMO | LUMO |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|