| Literature DB >> 30781420 |
Dana Morantes1,2, Efrén Muñoz3, Doron Kam4, Oded Shoseyov5.
Abstract
Various cellulosic materials have replaced petroleum-derived polymers, offering natural and sustainable alternatives. Among them,Entities:
Keywords: flocculation; nanocellulose; quaternary agent; surface modification
Year: 2019 PMID: 30781420 PMCID: PMC6409560 DOI: 10.3390/nano9020272
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1CNC-EPTMAC etherification reaction.
Conditions and results of the etherification reaction of CNC with CHPTAC.
| Time (h) | Molar Ratio 1 | Zeta Potential (mV) | Nitrogen (%) | DS 2 | Size (d.nm) | PdI 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6 | 33 ± 1.1 | 1.10 | 0.16 | 242.5 | 0.2 |
| 4 | 9 | 36.6 ± 0.2 | 1.33 | 0.21 | 235.7 | 0.2 |
| 4 | 12 | 40.4 ± 0.7 | 1.43 | 0.23 | 305.8 | 0.3 |
| 8 | 6 | 33.1 ± 0.1 | 1.11 | 0.17 | 247.2 | 0.2 |
| 8 | 9 | 37.6 ± 0.5 | 1.50 | 0.25 | 221.7 | 0.2 |
| 8 | 12 | 40.1 ± 1.3 | 1.45 | 0.24 | 234.7 | 0.2 |
| 24 | 6 | 33.8 ± 1.2 | 1.14 | 0.17 | 221.1 | 0.2 |
| 24 | 9 | 36.0 ± 1.0 | 1.90 | 0.36 | 203.5 | 0.2 |
| 24 | 12 | 38.8 ± 1.0 | 1.78 | 0.32 | 300.7 | 0.2 |
| CNCs | 0 | −33 ± 2.1 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 113.7 | 0.4 |
1 Mol of CHPTAC per AGU, 2 Degree of substitution (DS) and 3 Polydispersity index (PdI)
Figure 2Zeta potential measurements of CNC-EPTMAC.
Figure 3FT-IR absorbance spectra of CNC and CNC-EPTMAC.
Figure 4Crystallinity properties, XRD analysis.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric analysis (dotted line) and differential thermal analysis (unbroken line) of: (a) CNC and (b) CNC-EPTMAC.
Decomposition temperature and residual mass of modified and unmodified CNC.
| Sample | * 1 Tdi (°C) | 2 Tdm (°C) | 3 Tdf (°C) | Residual Mass (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNCs | 150 | 250 | 450 | 38.37 |
| CNC-EPTMAC | 178 | 320 | 450 | 30.03 |
* Decomposition temperature, 1 Tdi: initial, 2 Tdm: maximum and 3 Tdf: final.
Figure 6Differential scanning calorimetry analysis of CNCs (dotted line) and CNC-EPTMAC (unbroken line).
Figure 7Flocculation test of modified versus unmodified CNC (a) turbidity and (b) Zeta potential change.
Figure 8Effect of pH (acid pH 4, neutral pH 7 and alkaline pH 10) on flocculation. (a) Turbidity and (b) Zeta potential change.
Figure 9Effect of molar ratio on flocculation of SiO2 in the present of CNC-EPTMAC. (a) Turbidity and (b) Zeta potential change.
Figure 10CNC-EPTMAC flocculation efficacy as compared to commercial flocculants.