Literature DB >> 30781182

Resistance of Botrytis cinerea Isolates from Vegetable Crops to Anilinopyrimidine, Phenylpyrrole, Hydroxyanilide, Benzimidazole, and Dicarboximide Fungicides.

C K Myresiotis1, G S Karaoglanidis2, K Tzavella-Klonari1.   

Abstract

During February 2005, 55 single-spore isolates of Botrytis cinerea were collected at the end of the season from vegetable crops grown in 18 greenhouses on the island of Crete, Greece. They were tested for sensitivity to the anilinopyrimidine fungicides pyrimethanil and cyprodinil, the hydroxyanilide fungicide fenhexamid, the phenylpyrrole fungicide fludioxonil, the dicarboximide fungicide iprodione, and the benzimidazole fungicide carbendazim. Results of the study showed the existence of benzimidazole- and dicarboximide-resistant strains at frequencies of 61.8 and 18%, respectively. Moreover, for first time, the development of resistance to anilinopyrimidine fungicides by B. cinerea was detected in greenhouse vegetable crops on the island of Crete. High resistance frequencies of 49.1 and 57.4% were observed for pyrimethanil and cyprodinil, respectively. In addition, one isolate was found to be resistant to the hydroxyanilide fungicide fenhexamid, while no strains resistant to the phenylpyrrole fungicide were detected. Among the 55 isolates tested, 13 were resistant only to carbendazim, 6 were resistant only to anilinopyrimidines, 3 were resistant to both benzimidazoles and dicarboximides, 17 were resistant to both benzimidazoles and anilinopyrimidines, 6 were resistant to both dicarboximides and anilinopyrimidines, 1 was simultaneously resistant to benzimidazoles, dicarboximides, and anilinopyrimidines, 1 was resistant to both anilinopyrimidines and hydroxyanilides, and 8 were sensitive to all fungicides tested. A strong cross-resistance relationship was found between the two anilinopyrimidine fungicides tested when log transformed EC50 values of the isolates were subjected to a linear regression analysis (r = 0.71). Despite the detection of several phenotypes with simultaneous resistance to chemically unrelated active ingredients, in none of the remaining possible fungicide pairs was there observed any kind of cross-resistance relationship.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 30781182     DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Dis        ISSN: 0191-2917            Impact factor:   4.438


  5 in total

1.  Involvement of BcStr2 in methionine biosynthesis, vegetative differentiation, multiple stress tolerance and virulence in Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Wenyong Shao; Yalan Yang; Yu Zhang; Chiyuan Lv; Weichao Ren; Changjun Chen
Journal:  Mol Plant Pathol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 5.663

2.  Two Point Mutations on CYP51 Combined With Induced Expression of the Target Gene Appeared to Mediate Pyrisoxazole Resistance in Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Can Zhang; Muhammad Imran; Min Liu; Zhiwen Li; Huige Gao; Hongxia Duan; Shunli Zhou; Xili Liu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  A microbial ecosystem: agricultural Jiaosu achieves effective and lasting antifungal activity against Botrytis cinerea.

Authors:  Yue Zhang; Youhui Gao; Zehui Zheng; Xingyao Meng; Yafan Cai; Jianbin Liu; Yuegao Hu; Shuangdui Yan; Xiaofen Wang
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Preliminary Study of Resistance Mechanism of Botrytis cinerea to SYAUP-CN-26.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Huazhong Zhang; Wanying Zhu; Jingnan Peng; Xinghai Li; Yingzi Wang; Zhiqiu Qi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.411

5.  The Effect of (1S,2R-((3-bromophenethyl)amino)-N-(4-chloro-2-trifluoromethylphenyl) cyclohexane-1 -sulfonamide) on Botrytis cinerea through the Membrane Damage Mechanism.

Authors:  Jingnan Peng; Kai Wang; Tingyue Feng; Huazhong Zhang; Xinghai Li; Zhiqiu Qi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.