Literature DB >> 30779239

Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks.

A Ciobanu1, C Formuso1, A Syngelaki1, R Akolekar2,3, K H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of ultrasonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation in the prediction of delivery of a small-for-gestational-age (SGA) neonate and assess the additive value of, first, maternal risk factors and, second, fetal growth velocity between 20 and 36 weeks' gestation in improving such prediction.
METHODS: This was a prospective study of 44 043 singleton pregnancies undergoing routine ultrasound examination at 19 + 0 to 23 + 6 and at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine whether addition of maternal risk factors and growth velocity, the latter defined as the difference in EFW Z-score or fetal abdominal circumference (AC) Z-score between the third- and second-trimester scans divided by the time interval between the scans, improved the performance of EFW Z-score at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks in the prediction of delivery of a SGA neonate with birth weight < 10th and < 3rd percentiles within 2 weeks and at any stage after assessment.
RESULTS: Screening by EFW Z-score at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation predicted 63.4% (95% CI, 62.0-64.7%) of neonates with birth weight < 10th percentile and 74.2% (95% CI, 72.2-76.1%) of neonates with birth weight < 3rd percentile born at any stage after assessment, at a screen-positive rate of 10%. The respective values for SGA neonates born within 2 weeks after assessment were 76.8% (95% CI, 74.4-79.0%) and 81.3% (95% CI, 78.2-84.0%). For a desired 90% detection rate of SGA neonate delivered at any stage after assessment, the necessary screen-positive rate would be 33.7% for SGA < 10th percentile and 24.4% for SGA < 3rd percentile. Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that, in the prediction of a SGA neonate with birth weight < 10th and < 3rd percentiles, there was a significant contribution from EFW Z-score at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, maternal risk factors and AC growth velocity, but not EFW growth velocity. However, the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve for prediction of delivery of a SGA neonate by screening with maternal risk factors and EFW Z-score was not improved by addition of AC growth velocity.
CONCLUSION: Screening for SGA neonates by EFW at 35 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation and use of the 10th percentile as the cut-off predicts 63% of affected neonates. Prediction of 90% of SGA neonates necessitates classification of about 35% of the population as being screen positive. The predictive performance of EFW is not improved by addition of estimated growth velocity between the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  estimated fetal weight; growth velocity; pyramid of pregnancy care; small-for-gestational age; third-trimester screening

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30779239     DOI: 10.1002/uog.20243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  4 in total

1.  Personalized Model to Predict Small for Gestational Age at Delivery Using Fetal Biometrics, Maternal Characteristics, and Pregnancy Biomarkers: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Births Assisted at a Spanish Hospital.

Authors:  Peña Dieste-Pérez; Ricardo Savirón-Cornudella; Mauricio Tajada-Duaso; Faustino R Pérez-López; Sergio Castán-Mateo; Gerardo Sanz; Luis Mariano Esteban
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-05-08

2.  Use of a Feed-Forward Back Propagation Network for the Prediction of Small for Gestational Age Newborns in a Cohort of Pregnant Patients with Thrombophilia.

Authors:  Petronela Vicoveanu; Ingrid Andrada Vasilache; Ioana Sadiye Scripcariu; Dragos Nemescu; Alexandru Carauleanu; Dragos Vicoveanu; Ana Roxana Covali; Catalina Filip; Demetra Socolov
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-16

3.  Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 33-39 weeks' gestation in China: logistic regression modeling of the contributions of second- and third-trimester ultrasound data and maternal factors.

Authors:  Danping Xu; Xiuzhen Shen; Heqin Guan; Yiyang Zhu; Minchan Yan; Xiafang Wu
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 3.105

4.  Association of mid-trimester maternal angiogenic biomarkers with small-for-gestational-age infants in an urban Zambian cohort: a nested case-control study.

Authors:  Chileshe M Mabula-Bwalya; Megan E Smithmyer; Humphrey Mwape; Gabriel Chipili; Madelyn Conner; Bellington Vwalika; Kristina De Paris; Jeffrey S A Stringer; Joan T Price
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 4.447

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.