| Literature DB >> 30778338 |
Pacifica Sommers1, John L Darcy2, Dorota L Porazinska1,3, Eli M S Gendron1, Andrew G Fountain4, Felix Zamora4, Kim Vincent1, Kaelin M Cawley5,6, Adam J Solon1, Lara Vimercati1, Jenna Ryder1, Steven K Schmidt1.
Abstract
Although cryoconite holes, sediment-filled melt holes on glacier surfaces, appear small and homogenous, their microbial inhabitants may be spatially partitioned. This partitioning could be particularly important for maintaining biodiversity in holes that remain isolated for many years, such as in Antarctica. We hypothesized that cryoconite holes with greater species richness and biomass should exhibit greater partitioning between the sediments and water, promoting greater biodiversity through spatial niche partitioning. We tested this hypothesis by sampling frozen cryoconite holes along a gradient of biomass and biodiversity in the Taylor Valley, Antarctica, where ice-lidded cryoconite holes are a ubiquitous feature of glaciers. We extracted DNA and chlorophyll a from the sediments and water of these samples to describe biodiversity and quantify proxies for biomass. Contrary to our expectation, we found that cryoconite holes with greater richness and biomass showed less partitioning of phylotypes by the sediments versus the water, perhaps indicating that the probability of sediment microbes being mixed into the water is higher from richer sediments. Another explanation may be that organisms from the water were compressed by freezing down to the sediment layer, leaving primarily relic DNA of dead cells to be detected higher in the frozen water. Further evidence of this explanation is that the dominant sequences unique to water closely matched organisms that do not live in cryoconite holes or the Dry Valleys (e.g., vertebrates); so this cryptic biodiversity could represent unknown microbial animals or DNA from atmospheric deposition of dead biomass in the otherwise low-biomass water. Although we cannot rule out spatial niche partitioning occurring at finer scales or in melted cryoconite holes, we found no evidence of partitioning between the sediments and water in frozen holes. Future work should include more sampling of cryoconite holes at a finer spatial scale, and characterizing the communities of the sediments and water when cryoconite holes are melted and active.Entities:
Keywords: Antarctica; bacteria; ciliate; cryoconite; extremophile; niche partitioning
Year: 2019 PMID: 30778338 PMCID: PMC6369369 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00065
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1Richness of OTUs of bacteria and microbial eukaryotes in the sediment and water of cryoconite holes across three glaciers along a gradient of diversity. Tay: Taylor Glacier, Can: Canada Glacier, Com: Commonwealth Glacier. Richness in water (light bars) is scaled up to 1 l of water, and richness in sediments (dark bars) to 1 kg dry sediment. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals implemented in “ggplot2” (Wickham, 2009) in R.
FIGURE 2Principal coordinates analysis biplot of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity metric for bacterial and eukaryotic assemblages in cryoconite holes on three glaciers along a gradient of diversity. Solid circles: sediments; open circles: water. Red: Commonwealth Glacier; gold: Canada Glacier; navy: Taylor Glacier.
FIGURE 3Percent of OTUs found in the water of a given cryoconite hole also found in its sediment (light bars), and OTUs from the sediment also found in that hole’s water (dark bars) for both bacteria and microbial eukaryotes across three glaciers along a gradient of diversity. Tay: Taylor Glacier, Can: Canada Glacier, Com: Commonwealth Glacier. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals implemented in “ggplot2” (Wickham, 2009) in R.
FIGURE 4Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial OTUs in the water (left panels) and sediments (right panels) of cryoconite holes across three glaciers. Green: OTU is in the ten most abundant for both water and sediments on that glacier. Black: OTU is in ten most abundant of water or sediments on that glacier. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals implemented in “ggplot2” (Wickham, 2009) in R.
FIGURE 5Relative abundance of the dominant eukaryotic OTUs in the water (left panels) and sediments (right panels) of cryoconite holes across three glaciers. Green: OTU is in the ten most abundant for both water and sediments on that glacier. Black: OTU is in ten most abundant of water or sediments on that glacier. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals implemented in “ggplot2” (Wickham, 2009) in R.
FIGURE 6Measures of biomass proxies from the sediments and water in frozen cryoconite holes across three glaciers along a gradient of diversity. Measures include the concentrations of DNA in ng DNA/cm3 (top row), and chlorophyll a extracted per 1 l from the water and per 1 kg dry sediments (bottom row). Note the difference axis scale between water (left panels) and sediment (right panels). Tay: Taylor Glacier, Can: Canada Glacier, Com: Commonwealth Glacier. Error bars are bootstrapped 95% confidence limits, as implemented by ggplot2 (Wickham, 2009).