| Literature DB >> 30778181 |
Jordan G Kueneman1, Molly C Bletz2, Valerie J McKenzie3, C Guilherme Becker4, Maxwell B Joseph5, Juan G Abarca6, Holly Archer3, Ana Lisette Arellano3, Arnaud Bataille7, Matthew Becker8, Lisa K Belden9, Angelica Crottini10, Robert Geffers11, Célio F B Haddad12, Reid N Harris13, Whitney M Holden14, Myra Hughey15, Michael Jarek11, Patrick J Kearns16, Jacob L Kerby17, Jos Kielgast18, Atsushi Kurabayashi19,20,21, Ana V Longo22, Andrew Loudon23,24, Daniel Medina9, José J Nuñez25, R G Bina Perl26, Adrián Pinto-Tomás6,27, Falitiana C E Rabemananjara28, Eria A Rebollar29, Ariel Rodríguez30, Louise Rollins-Smith14, Robert Stevenson2, Christoph C Tebbe31, Gabriel Vargas Asensio6, Bruce Waldman7,32, Jenifer B Walke33, Steven M Whitfield34, Kelly R Zamudio35, Ibrahim Zúñiga Chaves6, Douglas C Woodhams36,37, Miguel Vences38.
Abstract
Animal-associated microbiomes are integral to host health, yet key biotic and abiotic factors that shape host-associated microbial communities at the global scale remain poorly understood. We investigated global patterns in amphibian skin bacterial communities, incorporating samples from 2,349 individuals representing 205 amphibian species across a broad biogeographic range. We analysed how biotic and abiotic factors correlate with skin microbial communities using multiple statistical approaches. Global amphibian skin bacterial richness was consistently correlated with temperature-associated factors. We found more diverse skin microbiomes in environments with colder winters and less stable thermal conditions compared with environments with warm winters and less annual temperature variation. We used bioinformatically predicted bacterial growth rates, dormancy genes and antibiotic synthesis genes, as well as inferred bacterial thermal growth optima to propose mechanistic hypotheses that may explain the observed patterns. We conclude that temporal and spatial characteristics of the host's macro-environment mediate microbial diversity.Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30778181 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-019-0798-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Ecol Evol ISSN: 2397-334X Impact factor: 15.460