Literature DB >> 30777901

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and benzodiazepine for intraoperative sedation in elderly patients: a randomized clinical trial.

João Manoel Silva-Jr1,2, Henrique T Katayama3,2, Fernando A M Nogueira3, Tatiane B Moura3, Thiago L Alves3, Barbara W de Oliveira3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Elderly individuals have a greater sensitivity to sedation, and the most commonly used drugs for sedation are benzodiazepines, which exhibit some complication. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the use of dexmedetomidine and midazolam regarding proper sedation and postoperative complications in elderly individuals who require intraoperative sedation.
METHODS: This study was a parallel-randomized clinical trial, which included 120 patients aged >70 years undergoing regional anesthesia and sedation. The exclusion criteria consisted of bradycardia, heart failure, respiratory failure, a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14, liver failure and refusal to participate. Patients were divided into two groups: the first group received midazolam (MDZ), while the second group received dexmedetomidine (DEX). The doses were titrated to achieve an intraoperative Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score between -3 and -1. Incidences of complications were recorded.
RESULTS: During a 120 min follow-up, the depth of sedation (RASS score) revealed variations less often in the DEX group (p=0.002). Patients in the DEX group (n=67) had lower rates of intraoperative complications (19.4% vs 73.6%, p<0.001). Intraoperatively, the incidence rates of psychomotor agitation (15.1% vs 1.5%, p=0.005), arterial hypotension (28.3% vs 3.0%, p<0.001) and respiratory depression (73.6% vs 0%, p<0.001) were higher in the MDZ group (n=53). During postanesthesia care, the incidence rates of shivering (p<0.001), residual sedation (p=0.04) and use of supplemental oxygen (p<0.001) were significantly lower in the DEX group.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of DEX for sedation during surgery provides better control over the depth of sedation and produces fewer complications in elderly individuals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02878837. © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical trial; conscious sedation; dexmedetomidine; geriatric assessment; regional anesthesia

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30777901     DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  5 in total

1.  Sedation with dexmedetomidine in elderly patients during dental surgery: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Mika Seto; Ryosuke Kita; Seiji Kondo
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-06-28

2.  Effect of age on dexmedetomidine treatment for ventilated patients with sepsis: a post-hoc analysis of the DESIRE trial.

Authors:  Tetsuya Sato; Yu Kawazoe; Noriko Miyagawa; Yuta Yokokawa; Shigeki Kushimoto; Kyohei Miyamoto; Yoshinori Ohta; Takeshi Morimoto; Hitoshi Yamamura
Journal:  Acute Med Surg       Date:  2021-04-09

3.  Midazolam versus Dexmedetomidine in Patients at Risk of Obstructive Sleep Apnea during Urology Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ivan Vuković; Božidar Duplančić; Benjamin Benzon; Zoran Đogaš; Ruben Kovač; Renata Pecotić
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Intraoperative Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Surgery With Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Jing Peng; Fujuan He; Chenguang Qin; Yuanyuan Que; Rui Fan; Bin Qin
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.658

5.  A Loading Dose of Dexmedetomidine With Constant Infusion Inhibits Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During Thoracic Spinal Decompression Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Study.

Authors:  Tun Liu; Yue Qin; Huaguang Qi; Zhenguo Luo; Liang Yan; Pengfei Yu; Buhuai Dong; Songchuan Zhao; Xucai Wu; Zhen Chang; Zhian Liu; Xuemei Liu; Tao Yuan; Houkun Li; Li Xiao; Gang Wang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 5.810

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.