| Literature DB >> 30777728 |
Michal Grzybek1, Alessandra Palladini1, Vasileia I Alexaki2, Michal A Surma3, Kai Simons3, Triantafyllos Chavakis4, Christian Klose5, Ünal Coskun6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Shotgun lipidomics enables an extensive analysis of lipids from tissues and fluids. Each specimen requires appropriate extraction and processing procedures to ensure good coverage and reproducible quantification of the lipidome. Adipose tissue (AT) has become a research focus with regard to its involvement in obesity-related pathologies. However, the quantification of the AT lipidome is particularly challenging due to the predominance of triacylglycerides, which elicit high ion suppression of the remaining lipid classes.Entities:
Keywords: Adipose tissue; Chow and high-fat diet; Lipid extraction; Lipid remodeling; Lipidomics; Method validation; Mouse; Shotgun mass spectrometry
Year: 2019 PMID: 30777728 PMCID: PMC6437637 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.01.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 1A) Linearity and proportionality assessed for total lipid content extracted from various amounts of SAT represented as linear regression of log-transformed lipid amounts and their intensities. B) Relative standard deviation (RSD) calculated for 276 lipids present in at least 4 out of 6 replicates. Each lipid molecule RSD was calculated and plotted against its abundance (in pmol). The median technical variation is 6.8% (green solid line) and RSD <15% (green dotted line) was observed for 78.6% of the detected lipids.
Limit of detection (LOD), Limit of quantification (LOQ), and linearity for various lipid classes in AT.
| Class | min (pmol) | LOD (pmol) | LOQ (pmol) | Slope | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CL | 0,23 | 0,83 | 2,52 | 0,96 | 0,99 |
| Cer | 0,09 | 0,67 | 2,04 | 0,94 | 1 |
| ST | 1,83 | 1,71 | 5,17 | 1,05 | 0,9 |
| HexCer | 0,09 | 0,93 | 2,81 | 0,94 | 0,99 |
| LPA | 0,09 | 0,81 | 2,46 | 1,04 | 0,99 |
| LPC | 0,23 | 0,70 | 2,11 | 0,97 | 0,99 |
| LPE | 0,09 | 0,78 | 2,38 | 0,94 | 0,99 |
| LPG | 0,09 | 0,92 | 2,80 | 0,94 | 0,99 |
| LPI | 0,09 | 1,03 | 3,13 | 1,01 | 0,98 |
| LPS | 0,09 | 1,42 | 4,32 | 0,99 | 0,92 |
| SM | 0,23 | 0,95 | 2,87 | 0,96 | 0,99 |
| TAG | 1,37 | 0,66 | 1,99 | 0,94 | 0,99 |
| CE | 1,37 | 3,24 | 9,83 | 0,88 | 0,94 |
| DAG | 0,09 | 0,90 | 2,72 | 0,89 | 0,99 |
| PA | 0,27 | 0,89 | 2,70 | 1,23 | 0,98 |
| PC | 0,91 | 0,92 | 2,79 | 0,96 | 0,99 |
| PE | 0,23 | 1,05 | 3,18 | 0,94 | 0,98 |
| PG | 0,09 | 0,79 | 2,38 | 1,03 | 0,99 |
| PI | 0,23 | 1,17 | 3,55 | 0,93 | 0,98 |
| PS | 0,23 | 1,1 | 3,32 | 1,11 | 0,97 |
Figure 2A) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of AT lipidomes. BAT and WAT samples clearly and significantly separate, with GAT and SAT samples from CD-fed mice clustering separately from GAT and SAT samples from HFD-fed mice. PC1 significantly segregates samples according to tissue type, and PC2 significantly segregates samples according to diet. Adjusted p-values (Benjamini-Hochberg correction) for PC1 are: < 0.001 for BAT-CD vs. BAT-HFD; < 0.001 for BAT-CD and BAT-HFD vs. GAT and SAT on CD and HFD; < 0.05 for GAT-CD vs. GAT-HFD and vs. SAT-HFD, and for SAT-CD vs. SAT-HFD; nonsignificant for all other GAT vs. SAT comparisons. Comparisons along PC2 are significant except for GAT vs. SAT on the same diet. B) Centered Minimum Curvilinear Embedding (cMCE) on Spearman correlation. Dimensions 1 and 3 significantly differentiate almost all groups of samples. Adjusted p-values (Benjamini-Hochberg correction) for D1 are < 0.001 for all comparisons except for GAT-HFD vs. SAT-HFD where p-value < 0.01, and for GAT-CD vs. SAT-CD where p-value < 0.05. Along D3 all comparisons are significant except GAT-HFD vs. SAT-HFD.
Figure 3Lipid class composition of white and brown adipose tissues following chow and high-fat diet excluding TAGs. Class abbreviations: Cer – ceramide; CL – cardiolipin; DAG – diacylglyceride; LPC – lysophosphatidylcholine; LPE – lyso-phosphatidylethanolamine; LPI – lysophosphatidylinositol; LPS – lysophosphatidylserine; PC – phosphatidylcholine; PC O- – ether-linked phosphatidylcholine; PE – phosphatidylethanolamine; PE O- – ether-linked phosphatidylethanolamine; PG – phosphatidylglycerol; PI – phosphatidylinositol; PS – phosphatidylserine; SM – sphingomyelin; ST – cholesterol. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between CD and HFD (p-value <0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***). The different depot types are color coded as follows: BAT green, GAT dark red, SAT yellow. White bars with colored border indicate cohorts on CD, colored bars indicate cohorts on HFD.
Figure 4Total acyl chain length (left side) and unsaturation (right side) profiles of: A) TAGs; B) membrane lipids. Lipids were regrouped according to the number of carbon atoms and the number of double bonds present in their acyl chains. Mean and standard deviation were calculated for each cohort using mol% - transformed data. Only length groups >3 mol% are represented; complete acyl chain length profiles of A and B are shown in the Supplementary Figure S3. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between CD and HFD (p-value < 0.05*, <0.01**, <0.001***). The different types of AT are color-coded as follows: BAT green, GAT dark red, SAT yellow. White bars with colored border indicate cohorts on CD; colored bars indicate cohorts on HFD.
Figure 5Subspecies level analysis of membrane lipids in fat tissues. Upper panel bar plots represent the difference between the means of HFD and CD in the respective adipose tissues: A) BAT; B) GAT; C) SAT. Only species with Δ > |0.5| mol% are shown. Lower panel bar plots represent the mean amount and standard deviation of the subspecies in CD and HFD cohorts. Asterisks indicate the species that differ significantly between diets according to the pairwise Mann–Whitney test performed on the log-transformed dataset; p-values were adjusted according to the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple comparisons.