Literature DB >> 30777394

Combining urinary DNA methylation and cell-free microRNA biomarkers for improved monitoring of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance.

Fang Zhao1, Danny Vesprini2, Richard S C Liu1, Ekaterina Olkhov-Mitsel1, Laurence H Klotz2, Andrew Loblaw2, Stanley K Liu2, Bharati Bapat3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer (CaP) patients with low-grade tumors are enrolled in active surveillance (AS) programs and monitored with digital rectal exams (DREs), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, and periodic invasive biopsies. Patients are "reclassified" with higher-risk disease if they show signs of disease progression. However, AS patients who will reclassify cannot be easily identified upfront and suffer morbidities associated with biopsy. Biomarkers derived from noninvasively obtained specimens such as serum or urine samples are promising alternatives to monitor patients with clinically insignificant cancer. Previously, we have characterized and validated a urinary DNA methylation panel and a serum miRNA panel for the prediction of patient reclassification in 2 independent AS cohorts. In this exploratory study, we have investigated cell-free miRNAs in the urinary supernatant combined with urinary DNA methylation markers to form an integrative panel for prediction of AS patient reclassification.
METHODS: Post-DRE urine was collected from 103 CaP patients on active surveillance. Urinary sediment DNA methylation levels of selected genes were previously analyzed using qPCR-based MethyLight assay. Using qRT-PCR, we analyzed the urinary supernatants for relative quantities of 10 miRNAs previously shown to be associated with AS reclassification. Logistic regression and Receiver Operating Characteristics curve analyses were performed to assess the predictive ability of miRNAs and DNA methylation biomarkers.
RESULTS: We identified a 3-marker panel, consisting of miR-24, miR-30c and CRIP3 methylation, that was significant for prediction of patient reclassification (Odds ratio = 2.166, 95% confidence interval = 1.22-3.847) with a negative predictive value of 90.9%. Our 3-marker panel also demonstrated additive value to PSA for prediction of patient reclassification (c-statistic = 0.717, ROC bootstrapped 1000 iteration P = 0.041).
CONCLUSION: A urinary integrated panel of methylation and miRNA markers is a promising approach to identify AS patients at risk for reclassification. Our 3-marker panel, with its high negative predictive value, would be beneficial to identify and preclude AS patients with truly indolent cancer and to personalize monitoring strategies for AS patients.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active surveillance; Biomarkers; DNA methylation; Prostate cancer; Urinary biomarkers; miRNA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30777394     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  9 in total

1.  Multiparametric MRI Versus SelectMDx Accuracy in the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant PCa in Men Enrolled in Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Pietro Pepe; Giuseppe Dibenedetto; Ludovica Pepe; Michele Pennisi
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Measurements Methods for the Development of MicroRNA-Based Tests for Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Francesca Precazzini; Simone Detassis; Andrea Selenito Imperatori; Michela Alessandra Denti; Paola Campomenosi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Prognostic value of miR-21 for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Y Cynthia Stafford; Colin E Willoughby; Colum P Walsh; Declan J McKenna
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Serine and one-carbon metabolisms bring new therapeutic venues in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Carlo Ganini; Ivano Amelio; Riccardo Bertolo; Eleonora Candi; Angela Cappello; Chiara Cipriani; Alessandro Mauriello; Carla Marani; Gerry Melino; Manuela Montanaro; Maria Emanuela Natale; Giuseppe Tisone; Yufang Shi; Ying Wang; Pierluigi Bove
Journal:  Discov Oncol       Date:  2021-10-27

5.  Investigating Urinary Circular RNA Biomarkers for Improved Detection of Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Madonna R Peter; Fang Zhao; Renu Jeyapala; Shivani Kamdar; Wei Xu; Cynthia Hawkins; Andrew J Evans; Neil E Fleshner; Antonio Finelli; Bharati Bapat
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  The miR-200 Family of microRNAs: Fine Tuners of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Circulating Cancer Biomarkers.

Authors:  Ilaria Cavallari; Francesco Ciccarese; Evgeniya Sharova; Loredana Urso; Vittoria Raimondi; Micol Silic-Benussi; Donna M D'Agostino; Vincenzo Ciminale
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Liquid Biopsy to Detect DNA/RNA Based Markers of Small DNA Oncogenic Viruses for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Prediction.

Authors:  Maurizio Provenzano; Abdou Kamal Allayeh
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 8.  miRNAs as Therapeutic Tools and Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Noemi Arrighetti; Giovanni Luca Beretta
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 6.321

9.  Prediction of Grade Reclassification of Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance through the Combination of a Three-miRNA Signature and Selected Clinical Variables.

Authors:  Paolo Gandellini; Chiara Maura Ciniselli; Tiziana Rancati; Cristina Marenghi; Valentina Doldi; Rihan El Bezawy; Mara Lecchi; Melanie Claps; Mario Catanzaro; Barbara Avuzzi; Elisa Campi; Maurizio Colecchia; Fabio Badenchini; Paolo Verderio; Riccardo Valdagni; Nadia Zaffaroni
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.