Literature DB >> 30777392

Prospective implementation of a nonopioid protocol for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion.

François Audenet1, Kyrollis Attalla1, Morgane Giordano2, John Pfail1, Marc A Lubin1, Nikhil Waingankar1, Daniel Gainsburg3, Ketan K Badani1, Alan Sim2, John P Sfakianos4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a nonopioid (NOP) perioperative pain management protocol for patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively included 52 consecutive patients undergoing RARC at our institution for bladder cancer. Patients received a multimodal pain management protocol, including a combination of nonopioid pain medications and regional anesthesia. For comparison, we retrospectively included 41 consecutive patients who received the same procedure before implementation of the NOP protocol.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in demographic and perioperative characteristics between the two groups. Patients included in the NOP protocol received a much lower dose of postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (2.5 [IQR: 0-23] vs. 44 [14.5-128], P < 0.001), with no difference in pain scores. In the NOP protocol, the median time to regular diet was significantly shorter (4days [IQR: 3-5] vs. 5days [IQR: 4-8], P = 0.002) and the length of stay was 2days shorter compared to the control group (5days [IQR: 4-7] vs. 7days [IQR: 6-11], P < 0.001). When evaluating the direct costs within 30days after initial surgery, the NOP protocol was associated with an 8.6% reduction as compared to the control group (P = 0.032). In multivariate analysis, the receipt of the NOP protocol was a significant predictor of a length of stay <7days after RARC (OR: 12.09; 95% CI: 1.70-140; P = 0.023).
CONCLUSIONS: The prospective implementation of a NOP protocol for patients undergoing RARC is feasible, allowing for minimal narcotic usage and provides benefits to patients, institutions, and population.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Length of stay; Opioid crisis; Pain management; Regional anesthesia; Robot-assisted radical cystectomy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30777392     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  6 in total

Review 1.  Reducing Opioid Use After Endourologic Procedures.

Authors:  Juan Serna; Ruchika Talwar; Daniel J Lee
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Opioids in Urology: How Well Are We Preventing Opioid Dependence and How Can We Do Better?

Authors:  Danyon J Anderson; David Y Cao; Jessica Zhou; Matthew McDonald; Abrahim N Razzak; Jamal Hasoon; Omar Viswanath; Alan D Kaye; Ivan Urits
Journal:  Health Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-15

3.  Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing Practices and Trends Among Urology Residents in the United States.

Authors:  James J Kelley; Sharon Hill; Samuel Deem; Nathan E Hale
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 4.  Enhanced recovery after surgery review and urology applications in 2020.

Authors:  Rodrigo Rodrigues Pessoa; Ahmet Urkmez; Naveen Kukreja; Janet Baack Kukreja
Journal:  BJUI Compass       Date:  2020-03-17

Review 5.  Updates on enhanced recovery after surgery for radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Grace Lee; Hiren V Patel; Arnav Srivastava; Saum Ghodoussipour
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 6.  Enhanced recovery strategies after penile implantation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ellis; Architha Sudhakar; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.