Literature DB >> 30777219

Fast isotropic volumetric magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle: Acceleration of the three-dimensional fast spin echo sequence using compressed sensing combined with parallel imaging.

Jisook Yi1, Young Han Lee2, Seok Hahn1, Salman S Albakheet1, Ho-Taek Song1, Jin-Suck Suh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the feasibility of three-dimensional fast spin echo (3D-FSE) imaging with compressed sensing (CS) and parallel imaging (PI) compared to 3D-FSE imaging with only PI in evaluating ankle joint pathologies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent ankle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including acquisition of image sets of 2D-FSE sequences, and 3D-FSE sequences without and with CS, between June 2016 and November 2017. Three MR image sets were independently rated by two radiologists for the presence/absence of ankle pathology. Quantitative image similarity and subjective image quality were evaluated using 3D-FSE images without CS and those with CS-PI. Inter-sequence agreement between 3D-FSE sequences without CS and with CS-PI in both readers was evaluated.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreements were nearly perfect for sprain of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL, κ=0.77), osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT, κ=0.76-0.88), osteochondral lesion of the distal tibia (OLTi, κ=0.74) and os subfibulare (OSF, κ=0.62-0.64). The structural similarity index (mean, 0.996; range, 0.990-0.997) between the 3D-FSE sequences without CS and with CS-PI was acceptable. There was no significant difference in subjective image quality between the two imaging sequences (ATFL, p = 0.317; bone marrow, p = 0.083; cartilage, p = 1.000, tendon, p = 1.000). Intersequence agreement between the 3D-FSE sequences with and without CS was nearly perfect (ATFL and OLTi, κ=1.00; OLT, κ=0.87-0.96; OSF, κ=0.62-0.64) in both readers.
CONCLUSIONS: Isotropic 3D-FSE ankle MRI with CS provides acceptable diagnostic performance with reduced scan time. Compressed sensing-related artifacts could be minimized with CS reconstruction enhancement, allowing for better image quality for evaluating ankle joint pathologies.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Compressed sensing; MR

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30777219     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

1.  Compressed sensing MRI of different organs: ready for clinical daily practice?

Authors:  Bénédicte Marie Anne Delattre; Sana Boudabbous; Catrina Hansen; Angeliki Neroladaki; Anne-Lise Hachulla; Maria Isabel Vargas
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Using the Compressed Sensing Technique for Lumbar Vertebrae Imaging: Comparison with Conventional Parallel Imaging.

Authors:  Tianyang Gao; Zhao Lu; Fengzhe Wang; Heng Zhao; Jiazheng Wang; Shinong Pan
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging       Date:  2021

3.  Image quality and acquisition time assessments for phase oversampling in compressed sensing sensitivity encoding: Comparison with conventional SENSE.

Authors:  Ji Sung Jang; Ho Beom Lee; Chong Hyun Suh; Min Hee Lee
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.