Literature DB >> 30776770

Analysis of the environmental behavior of farmers for non-point source pollution control and management: An integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory.

Yandong Wang1, Jiping Liang1, Jun Yang1, Xingxia Ma1, Xiaoqing Li1, Jing Wu1, Gaihe Yang1, Guangxin Ren2, Yongzhong Feng3.   

Abstract

Agricultural non-point source (NPS) pollution in water source protection areas poses serious challenges for governments in developing countries. It is important to consider the environmental behavior of farmers when exploring the causes of NPS pollution as well as when establishing scientific controls and management measures. However, the poor understanding of factors influencing the environmental behavior of farmers and the lack of a suitable environmental socio-psychological model limit the application of the environmental behavior of farmers in NPS pollution management. In this study, we therefore integrated the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the protection motivation theory (PMT) to identify the main determinants of the NPS pollution-related environmental behavior and intention of farmers in the Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. Results indicated that the integrated model provided a better understanding of the environmental behavior and intention of farmers than that provided by each component when used individually, and revealed that farmers perceived that the susceptibility and severity of threats caused by water deterioration influenced environmental intention through the mediating effects of subjective norm and attitude toward adopting pro-environmental behavior. At the same time, the perceived vulnerability of farmers was relatively high and their perceived severity was relatively low. Furthermore, the subjective norm, attitude, self-efficacy (i.e., the perceived behavioral control), and response efficacy positively and significantly influenced intention. However, response cost had a significantly negative effect on intention. Among them, subjective norm had the largest effect on intention. Intention was the key determinant for the actual environmental behavior of farmers, while self-efficacy also had a significantly positive effect on behavior. Managing and controlling agricultural NPS pollution requires a multi-disciplinary and comprehensive approach. Therefore, an integrated theoretical framework was developed in this study by integrating TPB and PMT to gain insight into the environmental behaviors and intention of farmers. The results provided a theoretical basis for NPS pollution control.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Farmers' environmental behavior; Non-point source pollution; Protection motivation theory; Theory of planned behavior

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30776770     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  12 in total

1.  The Dynamics of Changes and Spatial Differences in the Synthetic Indicator for Evaluating Environmental Performance in Poland: Current State.

Authors:  Adam Senetra; Katarzyna Pawlewicz; Adam Pawlewicz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Influence of Government Information on Farmers' Participation in Rural Residential Environment Governance: Mediating Effect Analysis Based on Moderation.

Authors:  Bowen Wang; Desheng Hu; Diandian Hao; Meng Li; Yanan Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Determinants and Willingness to Pay for Purchasing Mask against COVID-19: A Protection Motivation Theory Perspective.

Authors:  Qiying Ding; Shoufu Lin; Shanyong Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The Effect of Religiosity on Pro-environmental Behavior Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Iranian Rural Female Facilitators.

Authors:  Saeid Karimi; Genovaitė Liobikienė; Fatemeh Alitavakoli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Grower decision-making factors in adoption of specialty cultivars: A case study of potatoes in the San Luis Valley.

Authors:  Sahar B Toulabi; Becca Jablonski; David G Holm; Michael S Carolan; Adam L Heuberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  Socio-psychological determinants of Iranian rural households' adoption of water consumption curtailment behaviors.

Authors:  Moslem Savari; Ameneh Savari Mombeni; Hamed Izadi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Environmental Science: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Hongyun Si; Jian-Gang Shi; Daizhong Tang; Shiping Wen; Wei Miao; Kaifeng Duan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-04       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  An Evolutionary Game Model for the Multi-agent Co-Governance of Agricultural Non-Point Source Pollution Control under Intensive Management Pattern in China.

Authors:  Lingyan Xu; Zhuoyun Zhou; Jianguo Du
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Temporal and Spatial Heterogeneity of Soil Erosion and a Quantitative Analysis of Its Determinants in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China.

Authors:  Lin Chu; Tiancheng Sun; Tianwei Wang; Zhaoxia Li; Chongfa Cai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Evolution of Select Epidemiological Modeling and the Rise of Population Sentiment Analysis: A Literature Review and COVID-19 Sentiment Illustration.

Authors:  Talal Daghriri; Michael Proctor; Sarah Matthews
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.