Literature DB >> 30776750

Relationship between perfluorooctanoate and perfluorooctane sulfonate blood concentrations in the general population and routine drinking water exposure.

Shiyi Zhang1, Qiyue Kang1, Hui Peng2, Mengyu Ding1, Fanrong Zhao1, Yuyin Zhou1, Zhaomin Dong3, Haifeng Zhang4, Min Yang4, Shu Tao1, Jianying Hu5.   

Abstract

In regions with heavily contaminated drinking water, a significant contribution of drinking water to overall human perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoate (PFOA) exposure has been well documented. However, the relationship of PFOA/PFOS blood concentrations in the general population to routine drinking water exposure is not well characterized. This study determined the PFOA and PFOS concentrations in 166 drinking water samples across 28 cities in China. For 13 of the studied cities, PFOA and PFOS concentrations were analyzed in 847 human blood samples which were collected in parallel with the drinking water samples. The geometric mean PFOA and PFOS concentrations in drinking water were 2.5 ± 6.2 ng/L and 0.7 ± 11.7 ng/L, and population-weighted geometric mean blood concentrations were 2.1 ± 1.2 ng/mL and 2.6 ± 1.3 ng/mL, respectively. We found a significant correlation between the PFOA concentration in drinking water and blood (r = 0.87, n = 13, p < 0.001). The total daily intake of PFOA (0.24-2.13 ng/kg/day) and PFOS (0.19-1.87 ng/kg/day) were back-calculated from the blood concentrations with a one-compartment toxicokinetic model. We estimated relative source contributions (RSCs) of drinking water to total daily intake in China of 23 ± 3% for PFOA and 12.7 ± 5.8% for PFOS. Using the mean RSCs, we derived the health advisory values of 85 ng/L for PFOA and 47 ng/L for PFOS in China.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Criteria; Human exposure; Perfluorinated compounds; Relative source contribution

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30776750     DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Int        ISSN: 0160-4120            Impact factor:   9.621


  5 in total

1.  Serum Half-Lives for Short- and Long-Chain Perfluoroalkyl Acids after Ceasing Exposure from Drinking Water Contaminated by Firefighting Foam.

Authors:  Yiyi Xu; Tony Fletcher; Daniela Pineda; Christian H Lindh; Carina Nilsson; Anders Glynn; Carolina Vogs; Karin Norström; Karl Lilja; Kristina Jakobsson; Ying Li
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Contamination Profiles of Perfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in Groundwater in the Alluvial-Pluvial Plain of Hutuo River, China.

Authors:  Yan Liu; Xue Li; Xing Wang; Xiaocui Qiao; Shuran Hao; Jingrang Lu; Xiaodi Duan; Dionysios D Dionysiou; Binghui Zheng
Journal:  Water (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.103

3.  Risk-Based Chemical Ranking and Generating a Prioritized Human Exposome Database.

Authors:  Fanrong Zhao; Li Li; Yue Chen; Yichao Huang; Tharushi Prabha Keerthisinghe; Agnes Chow; Ting Dong; Shenglan Jia; Shipei Xing; Benedikt Warth; Tao Huan; Mingliang Fang
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Human exposure pathways to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) from indoor media: A systematic review protocol.

Authors:  Nicole M DeLuca; Michelle Angrish; Amina Wilkins; Kris Thayer; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Toxicokinetics of perfluorobutane sulfonate (PFBS), perfluorohexane-1-sulphonic acid (PFHxS), and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (PFOS) in male and female Hsd:Sprague Dawley SD rats after intravenous and gavage administration.

Authors:  M C Huang; A L Dzierlenga; V G Robinson; S Waidyanatha; M J DeVito; M A Eifrid; C A Granville; S T Gibbs; C R Blystone
Journal:  Toxicol Rep       Date:  2019-06-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.