Literature DB >> 30776740

Caring for women making unconventional birth choices: A meta-ethnography exploring the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives.

Claire Feeley1, Gill Thomson2, Soo Downe3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Women can face opposition when exerting autonomous decision-making regarding their birth choices, particularly when the decisions involve going against medical advice and/or outside of national guidelines. Termed 'unconventional birth choices', some research has explored women's reasons and experiences of making such choices, but less is known about the midwives caring for them.
OBJECTIVES: To synthesize existing qualitative literature on the views, attitudes, and experiences of midwives caring for women who make unconventional birth choices.
METHODS: A systematic search and meta-ethnography informed by Noblit and Hare and Schutz was undertaken. Eight databases were searched using predetermined search terms, alongside author, reference, citation chasing, and hand searching. Searches were conducted in July 2016 and updated in October 2017. Qualitative studies published since 1993 in English were included. Included studies were subjected to quality appraisal, conducted independently by two reviewers. Analysis was informed by the interpretative meta-ethnography methods. MAIN
RESULTS: Five studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight subthemes emerged. These resulted in three higher level interpretative themes emerged: perceptions of women's decision making, conflicting tensions as caregivers, ways of working with-woman.
CONCLUSIONS: Midwives can play a pivotal role in ensuring that respectful maternity care includes supporting women in their birthing decisions. Whilst limited research has been undertaken in this area, available insights suggest that midwives' views in this area are situated along a spectrum from 'willingly facilitative' to 'reluctantly accepting'. Views were influenced by context, as well as prior philosophies and values. While further research is needed, this study offers insights into the challenges women can face in seeking unconventional birth choices if they require support from midwives to do so.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth; Choices; Guidelines; Human rights; Meta-ethnography; Midwifery care; Midwives; Qualitative research

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30776740     DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.02.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  4 in total

1.  Addressing a need. Holistic midwifery in the Netherlands: A qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Martine Hollander; Esteriek de Miranda; Frank Vandenbussche; Jeroen van Dillen; Lianne Holten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Healthcare professionals' experiences and perceptions regarding health care of indigenous pregnant women in Ecuador.

Authors:  Tannia Valeria Carpio-Arias; Nervo Verdezoto; Marta Guijarro-Garvi; Victoria Abril-Ulloa; Nicola Mackintosh; Parisa Eslambolchilar; María Teresa Ruíz-Cantero
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  "I wouldn't have hit you, but you would have killed your baby:" exploring midwives' perspectives on disrespect and abusive Care in Ghana.

Authors:  Veronica Millicent Dzomeku; Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah; Emmanuel Kweku Nakua; Pascal Agbadi; Jody R Lori; Peter Donkor
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Understanding how midwives employed by the National Health Service facilitate women's alternative birthing choices: Findings from a feminist pragmatist study.

Authors:  Claire Feeley; Gill Thomson; Soo Downe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.