| Literature DB >> 30776170 |
Melissa Martyn1,2,3, Anaita Kanga-Parabia1,2,3, Elly Lynch1,3,4, Paul A James5,6, Ivan Macciocca3,4, Alison H Trainer5,6, Jane Halliday2,3, Louise Keogh2, Janney Wale1, Ingrid Winship6, Michael Bogwitz6, Giulia Valente7, Maie Walsh5,6, Lilian Downie2,3,4, David Amor2,8, Mathew Wallis7, Fiona Cunningham3,9, Matthew Burgess7, Natasha J Brown2,3,4,7,8, Anna Jarmolowicz3,4, Sebastian Lunke3,4, Ilias Goranitis2,3, Clara L Gaff1,2,3.
Abstract
Internationally, the practice of offering additional findings (AFs) when undertaking a clinically indicated genomic test differs. In the USA, the recommendation is to include analysis for AFs alongside diagnostic analysis, unless a patient opts-out, whereas European and Canadian guidelines recommend opt-in models. These guidelines all consider the offer of AFs as an activity concurrent with the offer of diagnostic testing. This paper describes a novel two-step model for managing AFs within the healthcare system in Victoria, Australia and presents the study protocol for its evaluation. Adults who have received results of diagnostic whole exome sequencing undertaken within the healthcare system are invited to attend a genetic counseling appointment to consider reanalysis of their stored genomic data for AFs. The evaluation protocol addresses uptake, decision-making, understanding, counseling challenges, and explores preferences for future models of care. Recruitment commenced in November 2017 and will cease when 200 participants have been approached. When the study is concluded, the evaluation results will contribute to the evidence base guiding approaches to counseling and models of care for AFs.Entities:
Keywords: additional findings; decision-making; evaluation; genomics; reanalysis; secondary findings; service delivery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30776170 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Genet Couns ISSN: 1059-7700 Impact factor: 2.537