Literature DB >> 30775032

Programmed death ligand 1 immunohistochemistry in non-small cell lung carcinoma.

Sylvie Lantuejoul1,2,3,4, Diane Damotte4,5,6, Véronique Hofman4,7,8, Julien Adam4,9.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide with low response rates to conventional chemotherapy. New promising therapies have emerged based on programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunity checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), including anti-PD-1, such as nivolumab and pembrolizumab, or programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, such as atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. The prescription of pembrolizumab has been approved by FDA and EMA for advanced stages non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), restricted for first-line setting to patients whose tumor presents ≥50% of PD-L1 positive tumor cells (TC), and ≥1% for second-line and beyond, leading to consider PD-L1 assay as a companion diagnostic tool for pembrolizumab. Very recently, the EMA has approved durvalumab for the treatment of patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC not progressing after chemoradiotherapy and whose tumors express PD-L1 on ≥1% of TC. Four standardized PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assays have been used in clinical trials; 22C3 and 28-8 PharmDx assays on Dako/Agilent platforms, and SP142 and SP263 assays on Ventana platforms, each test having been developed initially for a specific ICI. They differ in terms of primary monoclonal antibody, platform, detection system and scoring methods with different thresholds of positivity validated in clinical trials. Several studies have shown a close analytical performance of the 22C3, 28-8 and SP263 assays regarding TC staining in NSCLC, with poor concordance with SP142 assay and for immune cells. However, as dedicated platforms are not available in all pathology laboratories and because of the high cost of these assays, laboratory developed tests are widely used in many countries. Their validation must guarantee the same sensitivities and specificities as compared to standardized assays. Overall, PD-L1 test is of great help to select patients who could benefit for ICI and most pathologists have included this test in their daily practice for advanced stages NSCLC, besides ALK and ROS1 IHC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1); diagnostic assays; immunohistochemistry; immunotherapy; laboratory developed tests; lung cancer

Year:  2019        PMID: 30775032      PMCID: PMC6353738          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  20 in total

1.  First-line immunotherapy for patients with advanced stage or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer…finally what threshold of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells?

Authors:  Paul Hofman
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-10

2.  The ubiquitin E3 ligase FBXO22 degrades PD-L1 and sensitizes cancer cells to DNA damage.

Authors:  Sarmishtha De; Elise G Holvey-Bates; Kala Mahen; Belinda Willard; George R Stark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  PD-1/PD-L1 pathway: current researches in cancer.

Authors:  Yanyan Han; Dandan Liu; Lianhong Li
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  Selected highlights of the 2019 Pulmonary Pathology Society Biennial Meeting: PD-L1 test harmonization studies.

Authors:  Sylvie Lantuejoul; Francesca Damiola; Julien Adam
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06

5.  Evaluation of an online training tool for scoring programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) diagnostic tests for lung cancer.

Authors:  Bharat Jasani; Gudrun Bänfer; Rebecca Fish; Wim Waelput; Yves Sucaet; Craig Barker; Jessica L Whiteley; Jill Walker; Rudy Hovelinck; Rolf Diezko
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 2.644

Review 6.  PD-L1 Testing in Cytological Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Specimens: A Comparison with Biopsies and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Mohammed S I Mansour; Kajsa Ericson Lindquist; Tomas Seidal; Ulrich Mager; Rikard Mohlin; Lena Tran; Kim Hejny; Benjamin Holmgren; Despoina Violidaki; Katalin Dobra; Annika Dejmek; Maria Planck; Hans Brunnström
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.319

7.  Automated tumor proportion scoring for PD-L1 expression based on multistage ensemble strategy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Boju Pan; Yuxin Kang; Yan Jin; Lin Yang; Yushuang Zheng; Lei Cui; Jian Sun; Jun Feng; Yuan Li; Lingchuan Guo; Zhiyong Liang
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.531

8.  Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of the PD-L1 Test with Image Analysis and Multiplex Hybridization.

Authors:  Matthew P Humphries; Victoria Bingham; Fatima Abdullahi Sidi; Stephanie G Craig; Stephen McQuaid; Jacqueline James; Manuel Salto-Tellez
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 6.575

9.  Expression and clinical significance of PD-L1 and BRAF expression in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Yabing Cao; Kin Iong Chan; Gungli Xiao; Yanqun Chen; Xibin Qiu; Hu Hao; Sao Chi Mak; Tongyu Lin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Tumour PD-L1 Expression in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Acheampong; Afaf Abed; Michael Morici; Samantha Bowyer; Benhur Amanuel; Weitao Lin; Michael Millward; Elin S Gray
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.